Socio-economic Constraints to Community Participation in Rural Water Management: A case of Ndarugu-Thiririka Sub-catchment, Kiambu County

Ann Waithaka^1,

¹Department of Geography, Mount Kenya University, Thika, Kenya

Cite this paper:
Ann Waithaka. Socio-economic Constraints to Community Participation in Rural Water Management: A case of Ndarugu-Thiririka Sub-catchment, Kiambu County. Social and Economic Geography. 2024; 7(1):1-6. doi: 10.12691/seg-7-1-1

Abstract

The provision of sustainable water supply has been a central issue in Kenya with priority on low-income rural communities and underdeveloped areas with poor water resources. This has forced many rural communities to embrace community management model in rural water systems. Community participation in rural water management is purportedly a key element for community water projects to be sustainable. This paper aims to establish socio-economic constraints to community participation in rural water management in Ndarugu-Thiririka sub-catchment in Kiambu County, Kenya. The study was carried out in four community managed rural water supply projects. Namely; Kinyathena, Juja Farm, Munyu and Kamunyaka. Different types of data were collected using household questionnaires, in-depth interviews and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the data while inferential statistics such as chi-square (χ²⁾ and ANOVA were used to reach conclusions and make generalizations of the population. ANOVA test results (F= 1.67, p= 0.018, p <0.05) reveal that there is a significant difference in the level of community participation on the basis of monthly income while ANOVA test results (F= 1.02, p= 0.45, p >0.05) and (F= 1.22, p= 0.21, p >0.05) reveal that there is no significant difference in the level of community participation on the basis of the level of education and economic activity respectively. In addition, chi-square test value (χ²=23.88,df=8, p= 0.002, p<0.05) reveals a significant relationship between age and the level of community participation while Chi-square test value (χ²=1.72,df=2, p= 0.42, p>0.05) reveals no significant relationship between gender and the level of community participation. The study recommends the government, Non-Governmental Organizations and donors to provide programmes for intensifying agricultural production, credit and rural financial support to the communities involved in rural water management. This will form the basis for ensuring water availability for rural development.

Keywords:
socio-economic constraints community participation rural water management Ndarugu-Thirika sub-catchment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Government of Kenya. Report on sessional paper no.1 of 2021 on national water policy, Government printers, Nairobi, 2021.
[2]	United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, The United Nation World Water Development Report 2: Case study: Kenya –Kenya National Water Development Report. World Water Assessment Program (WWAP), UNESCO, Paris, 2018.
[3]	Government of Kenya, Constitution of Kenya 2010.Government printers, Nairobi, Kenya, 2010.
[4]	Government of Kenya, The project on the development The National Water Master Plan 2030, Ministry of Water and Natural Resources, Government printers, Nairobi, 2013, Volume 1.
[5]	Chepyegon, C. and Kamiya, D., “Challenges faced by the Kenya water sector management in improving water supply coverage”, Journal of water resources protection, 2018, 10, 85-105.
[6]	Government of Kenya, The National Water Services Strategy (NWSS) (2007-2015), Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Government Printers, Kenya, 2007.
[7]	Rampa, F., Analysing government in the water sector, Discussion paper no. 124, European Centre for Developmet Policy Management, Maastricht, 2011.
[8]	United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, “Kenya, water, sanitation and hygiene. Global thematic report”, 2018.
[9]	GTZ Water Resource Sector Reform Programme, Best practices in Bwathonaro Sub-catchment within Tana River Catchment, April 1st, 2007, 2007 56-87.
[10]	Ong’or, D.O., Community participation in integrated water resource management; The Case of Lake Victoria Basin, Summer School, DAAD 2005, 2005.
[11]	The Water Act 2016, Gazette notice on 21st April, 2017.
[12]	World Bank, Sustainability assessment of rural water service delivery models. Findings of a multi-country review, 2017.
[13]	United Nations, Water for people, water for life; World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP); World Water Development Report, Paris, UNESCO and New York, Berghahn Books, 2003, 89-123.
[14]	World Bank, Community-Driven Development: A Study Methodology, 2003, 16-56.
[15]	Amerasinghe, N.M., A Study of the Factors Affecting the Sustainability of Community Managed Rural Water Supply Schemes in Sri Lanka. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009, 2-84.
[16]	Business Daily, “Economic growth builds the rank of Kenya’s newly rich”, 2012 (http://www.businessdailyafrica.com.
[17]	IRC, Community Water Supply Management: History of a Concept; Delft, the Netherlands, 2003, 53-116.
[18]	Nisha, K.R., Community participation in rural water supply: An analysis using household data from North Kerara; PhD Thesis; Institute for Social and Economic Change, 2006, 13-118.
[19]	Prokopy, L.S. Women’s participation in rural water supply in India: Is moving beyond tokenism and does it matter? Water Policy, 2004, 6: 103-116.
[20]	IRC and WHO, Operation and maintenance of rural water supply and sanitation system, 2000, 45-72.
[21]	World Bank, Empowerment and poverty reduction: A Sourcebook for World Bank Staff; Washington D.C.; World Bank, 2002, 56-117.
[22]	McCommon, C., Warner, D. and Yohalem, D.,Community management of rural water supply and sanitation services, UNDP-World Bank Water and Sanitation Programme, Washington DC, USA, 1990, 57-82.
[23]	Lockwood, H., Institutional Support Mechanisms for community-managed rural water supply and sanitation systems in Latin America; Environmental Health Project (EHP); Strategic Report 6; US Agency for International Development, Washington DC 20523, 2002.
[24]	Garande, T. and Dagg, S., Public participation and effective water governance at the local level. A case study from small under-developed area in Chile, 2005, 87-134.
[25]	The United Nations-World Water Assessment Programme, Water: A shared responsibility; United Nations-World Water Development Report 2; UNESCO, New York, 2006.
[26]	Moningka, L.,Community participation in solid waste management; Factors favouring sustainability of community participation; A Literature Review, WASTE, 2000.
[27]	Haddad, F., Alzoubi, R., Alaween, M., and Shraide, F., Local community participation for sustainable water resource management, 2007, 6-36.
[28]	Blagbrough, V. (Ed), Looking back-The long-term impacts of water and sanitation projects, WaterAid, London, UK, 2001, 43.