Sustainable Energy
ISSN (Print): 2372-2134 ISSN (Online): 2372-2142 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/rse Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Sustainable Energy. 2022, 10(1), 21-28
DOI: 10.12691/rse-10-1-2
Open AccessArticle

Feasibility of Biogas Production from Cowpea Hull Anaerobic Digestion: Effect of Co-digestion with Waste-activated Sludge and Rice Straw

Christian Toochukwu Ogbonna1, , Ondiba Hesborn Andole1 and Zhenya Zhang2

1Graduate School of Life and Earth Sciences, Ph.D. Env. Studies, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan

2Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan

Pub. Date: October 13, 2022

Cite this paper:
Christian Toochukwu Ogbonna, Ondiba Hesborn Andole and Zhenya Zhang. Feasibility of Biogas Production from Cowpea Hull Anaerobic Digestion: Effect of Co-digestion with Waste-activated Sludge and Rice Straw. Sustainable Energy. 2022; 10(1):21-28. doi: 10.12691/rse-10-1-2

Abstract

Methane production from cowpea hull via anaerobic digestion is an environmentally friendly technique for renewable energy generation and organic waste management in Nigeria, where over half of its global production came from. However, the laboratory study on the anaerobic digestion of cowpea hull has not been sufficiently established. This study investigated the feasibility of methane production from Cowpea hull mono digestion compared to the performance of the conventional anaerobic digestion feedstock. Mono digestion of waste-activated sludge or rice straw under the same anaerobic digestion condition was set up for this purpose. Furthermore, we investigated the effectiveness of cowpea hull co-digestion with waste-activated sludge or rice straw on biogas optimization. Lastly, the optimum mixing ratio of cowpea hull to waste-activated was also quantified. Seven batch setup was subjected to 16 days of fermentation under mesophilic anaerobic conditions. Cowpea hull under mono digestion produced the highest total cumulative biogas of 203.19 mL/g-VSadded, followed by Rice straw (177.24 mL/g-VSadded). Waste-activated sludge had the least biogas 148.71 mL/g-VSadded). Compared to mono digestion, we realized a 27.05 % or 18.95 % optimization of biogas production from cowpea hull co-digested with rice straw or waste-activated sludge. An optimum mixing ratio of cowpea hull to waste-activated sludge was established at 3:1 (75:25) in this study. Our study is the second to investigate the bio-gasification of cowpea hull and the first to test its co-digestion and solid content characterization necessary for future investigation on cowpea hull anaerobic digestion.

Keywords:
anaerobic digestion methane cowpea hull co-digestion mixing ratio

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Ugwoke, B., O. Gershon, C. Becchio, S.P. Corgnati, P. Leone, (2020). A review of Nigerian energy access studies: the story told so far, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 120, 109646, 2019.
 
[2]  The federal government of Nigeria. (2018). Nigeria's First Biennial Update Report (BUR1): under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
 
[3]  Nigeria Power Baseline Report. (2015). The federal government of Nigeria's annual report.
 
[4]  Giwa, A., Alab, A., Yusuf, T. O. (2017). A comprehensive review on biomass and solar energy for sustainable energy generation in Nigeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 620-641.
 
[5]  The Federal Ministry of power. National Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Policy; 2015.
 
[6]  Ngumah CC, Ogbulie JN, Orji JC, Amadi ES. (2013) Biogas potential of organic waste in Nigeria. J Urban Environ Eng 7: 110-6.
 
[7]  Ayodele, T. R., Alao, M. A., & Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O. (2018). Recyclable resources from municipal solid waste: Assessment of its energy, economic and environmental benefits in Nigeria. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134, 165-173.
 
[8]  Abbasi, T., Tauseef, S. M., & Abbasi, S. A. (2012). A brief history of anaerobic digestion and “biogas.” Biogas Energy, pp. 11-23.
 
[9]  Mokuolu, O. A., Coker, A. O., & Sridhar, M. K. C. (2016). Contributions of solid wastes disposal practice to malaria prevalence in Ilorin, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technological Development, 13(1), 1-5.
 
[10]  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2018). Guidelines on the measurement of harvest and post-harvest losses Recommendations on the design of a harvest and post-harvest loss statistics system for food grains (cereals and pulses). Retrieved January 10, 2020, from http://www.fao.org/3/ca6396en/ca6396en.pdf.
 
[11]  Mohammed Y Mustafa M Bashir N Ogundola M Umar U (2014) Sustainable potential of bioenergy resources for distributed power generation development in Nigeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 361-370.
 
[12]  Anyanwu, C. N., Ibeto, C. N., Eze, I. S., & Ezeoha, S. L. (2013). Present and prospective energy use potentials of selected agricultural wastes in Nigeria. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 5(3), 032703.
 
[13]  Palmqvist, E., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (2000). Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresource Technology, 74(1), 17-24.
 
[14]  Palmqvist, E., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (2000). Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresource Technology, 74(1), 25-33.
 
[15]  The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) (2018) Crops in Nigeria; Cowpea Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.iita.org/cropsnew/cowpea/.
 
[16]  Martin, S. (2015). Biogasausbeuten verschiedener Substrate - Programm Berechnung. Retrieved January 10, 2020, from https://www.lfl.bayern.de/iba/energie /049711/?sel_list=21%2Cb&anker0=substratanker#substratanker.
 
[17]  Ukpai, P., Nnabuchi, M. (2012) Comparative study of biogas production from cow dung, cow pea and cassava peeling using 45 litres biogas digester. Prime Research on Medicine (PROM), 2 (3), 1864-1869.
 
[18]  Kim, M., Yang, Y., Morikawa-Sakura, M. S., Wang, Q., Lee, M. V., Lee, D. Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Hydrogen production by anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and sewage sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 3142-3149.
 
[19]  Zhang et al., (1999). R.H. Zhang, Z.Q. Zhang Biogasification of rice straw with an anaerobic-phased solids digester system Bioresour. Technol., 68 (3), pp. 235-245.
 
[20]  Tognetti, C., Mazzarino, M. J., & Laos, F. (2007). Improving the quality of municipal organic waste compost. Bioresource Technology, 98(5), 1067-1076.
 
[21]  Bernadette Assamoi, Yuri Lawryshyn, The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion, Waste Management, Volume 32, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1019-1030.
 
[22]  Lastella, G., Testa, C., Cornacchia, G., Notornicola, M., Voltasio, F., & Sharma, V. K. (2002). Anaerobic digestion of semi-solid organic waste: biogas production and its purification. Energy Conversion and Management, 43(1), 63-75.
 
[23]  Amha, Y. M., Anwar, M. Z., Brower, A., Jacobsen, C. S., Stadler, L. B., Webster, T. M., & Smith, A. L. (2018). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion processes: applications of molecular tools. Bioresource Technology, 247, 999-1014.
 
[24]  Buysman, E. (2009). Biogas for developing countries with cold climates: addressing the challenges of biogas production in cold regions. Wageningen University, Wageningen.
 
[25]  Zhang, J., Mao, L., Nithya, K., Loh, K. C., Dai, Y., He, Y., Wah Tong, Y. (2019). Optimizing mixing strategy to improve the performance of an anaerobic digestion waste-to-energy system for energy recovery from food waste. Applied Energy, 249, 28-36.
 
[26]  Yufang Wei, Xiujin Li, Liang Yu, Dexun Zou, Hairong Yuan, (2015). Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and corn stover with biological and chemical pretreatment, Bioresource Technology, Volume 198, Pages 431-436.
 
[27]  Ondiba Hesborn Andole, Zhongfang Lei, Zhenya Zhang, James Raude and Christopher Kanali. Optimization of Biogas Production in Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure by the Use of Alkalinity Index to Monitor a Prototype Cylindrical Digester. Sustainable Energy. 2017; 5(1):32-37.
 
[28]  Lima, D. R. S., Adarme, O. F. H., Baêta, B. E. L., Gurgel, L. V. A., & de Aquino, S. F. (2018). Influence of different thermal pretreatments and inoculum selection on the biomethanation of sugarcane bagasse by solid-state anaerobic digestion: A kinetic analysis. Industrial Crops and Products, 111, 684-693.
 
[29]  M. Kim et al., “Hydrogen and methane production from untreated rice straw and raw sewage sludge under thermophilic anaerobic conditions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 21, pp. 8648-8656, Jul. 2013.
 
[30]  Kim, S. H., Han, S. K., & Shin, H. S. (2004). Feasibility of biohydrogen production by anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29(15), 1607-1616.
 
[31]  Siddique, M. N. I., & Wahid, Z. A. (2018). Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 359-371.
 
[32]  Wang, M., Li, W., Li, P., Yan, S., & Zhang, Y. (2017). An alternative parameter to characterize biogas materials: Available carbon-nitrogen ratio. Waste Management, 62, 76-83.
 
[33]  Haider, M. R., Zeshan, Yousaf, S., Malik, R. N., & Visvanathan, C. (2015). Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Bioresource Technology, 190, 451-457.
 
[34]  APHA, (2012). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, twenty-second ed. American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
 
[35]  Fan, Y., Lei, Z., Guo, Z., Huang, W., Wang, D., Wang, X., Zhang, Z., & Shimizu, K. (2020). Enhanced solubilization of solid organics and methane production by anaerobic digestion of swine manure under nano-bubble water addition. Bioresource Technology, 299, 122512.
 
[36]  Mulat, D. G., & Horn, S. J. (2018). Biogas production from lignin via anaerobic digestion. In Lignin Valorization (pp. 391-412).
 
[37]  Barua, V. B. Rathore, V., and A. S. Kalamdhad, “Anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth and banana peels with and without thermal pretreatment,” Renewable Energy, vol. 134, pp. 103-112, Apr. 2019.
 
[38]  Syaichurrozi, I., (2018). Biogas production from co-digestion Salviniamolesta and rice straw and kinetics, Renew. Energy 115, 76e86.
 
[39]  Selvam, A., Ilamathi, P. M. K., Udayakumar, M., Murugesan, K., Banu, J. R., Khanna, Y., & Wong, J. (2021). Food Waste Properties. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering (pp. 11-41). Elsevier.
 
[40]  Rodriguez-Chiang, L., J. Llorca, and O. Dahl, Anaerobic co-digestion of acetate-rich with lignin-rich wastewater and the effect of hydrotalcite addition. Bioresource Technology, 2016. 218: p. 84-91.
 
[41]  Hidalgo, D., and J. M. Martín-Marroquín, “Effects of inoculum source and co-digestion strategies on anaerobic digestion of residues generated in the treatment of waste vegetable oils,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 142, pp. 17-22, Sep. 2014.
 
[42]  FAOSTAT. (2022). Crops. Retrieved October 8, 2022, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.