World Journal of Preventive Medicine
ISSN (Print): 2379-8823 ISSN (Online): 2379-8866 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jpm Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
World Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020, 8(1), 1-6
DOI: 10.12691/jpm-8-1-1
Open AccessCommunication

Presenting Meaningful Lifestyle Physical Activity Images to People for a More Realistic, Doable, and Enjoyable Way to Meet Our Physical Activity Guidelines

M. Felicia Cavallini1, and David J. Dyck2

1Limestone University, Gaffney, South Carolina, USA

2University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Pub. Date: August 04, 2020

Cite this paper:
M. Felicia Cavallini and David J. Dyck. Presenting Meaningful Lifestyle Physical Activity Images to People for a More Realistic, Doable, and Enjoyable Way to Meet Our Physical Activity Guidelines. World Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020; 8(1):1-6. doi: 10.12691/jpm-8-1-1

Abstract

Most Americans and Canadians do not meet their respective country’s physical activity (PA) guidelines of 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous activity and 2 or more strengthening activities per week. More recent studies have indicated a preference for lifestyle PA rather than traditional exercise, suggesting a need for a change of strategy in how we motivate, educate and connect people to their meaningful PA. The purpose of this study was to examine peoples’ beliefs, outlooks, and attitudes towards PA and exercise in Southern Ontario, Canada and South Carolina, United States with the overarching goal of adding a new paradigm to the already established standard of exercise. The study was conducted in two phases: first, a qualitative focus-group based phase in which feedback towards attitudes towards exercise and PA was used to generate a quantitative questionnaire which was used in phase two. Our results indicate that the majority of participants from Southern Ontario and South Carolina, ages 18-64, perceive a difference between lifestyle PA and exercise (Southern Ontario, 84% of males, 80% of females; South Carolina, 82% males, 74% females), and that engaging in lifestyle PA is a more natural, realistic and enjoyable part of their day than exercise (Southern Ontario, 83% of males, 78% of females; South Carolina, 81% males, 74% females). Additionally, participants indicated a preference towards lifestyle PA as opposed to within a gym environment. Overall, Southern Ontarians and South Carolinians were consistent in their message for a more unstructured, unregimented, natural way of being physically active throughout the day. Physical activity needs to be customized, tailored and meaningful for everyone.

Keywords:
physical activity individual natural lifestyle promotion graphics

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines. 2012.
 
[2]  Colley, R.C., et al., Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Reports, 2011. 22(1): p. 7-14.
 
[3]  Shields, M., et al., Fitness of Canadian adults: Results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Reports, 2010. 21(1).
 
[4]  United States Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity. 2018.
 
[5]  Akil, L. and H.A. Ahmad, Relationships between obesity and cardiovascular diseases in four southern states and Colorado. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 2011. 22(4 Suppl): p. 61-72.
 
[6]  Gonzalez, K., J. Fuentes, and J.L. Marquez, Physical Inactivity, Sedentary Behavior and Chronic Diseases. Korean J Fam Med, 2017. 38(3): p. 111-115.
 
[7]  Burton, N.W., A. Khan, and W.J. Brown, How, where and with whom? Physical activity context preferences of three adult groups at risk of inactivity. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012. 46(16): p. 1125-1131.
 
[8]  Cavallini, M.F., et al., Introducing MyHouse Activity and MyWork Activity: A Paradigm Shift towards Lifestyle Physical Activity Supported by Evidence from a Focus Group Study. Journal of Physical Activity Research, 2017. 2(1): p. 61-67.
 
[9]  Salmon, J., et al., Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Health Psychology, 2003. 22(2): p. 178-188.
 
[10]  Burton, N.W., A. Khan, and W.J. Brown, How, where and with whom? Physical activity context preferences of three adult groups at risk of inactivity. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2012. 46(16): p. 1125-31.
 
[11]  Salmon, J., et al., Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Health Psychology, 2003. 22(2): p. 178-88.
 
[12]  Booth, M.L., et al., Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Preventive Medicine, 1997. 26(1): p. 131-7.
 
[13]  Ainsworth, B.E., et al., 2011 compendium of physical activities: A second update of codes and MET values. 2011.
 
[14]  Huerta, J.M., et al., Work, household, and leisure-time physical activity and risk of mortality in the EPIC-Spain cohort. Preventive Medicine, 2016. 85: p. 106-112.
 
[15]  Samitz, G., M. Egger, and M. Zwahlen, Domains of physical activity and all-cause mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2011. 40(5): p. 1382-1400.
 
[16]  Calfas, K.J., et al., A controlled trial of physician counseling to promote the adoption of physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 1996. 25(3): p. 225-233.
 
[17]  Cardinal, B.J. and M.L. Sachs, Effects of mail-mediated, stage-matched exercise behavior change strategies on female adults' leisure-time exercise behavior. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 1996. 36(2): p. 100-107.
 
[18]  Jarvis, K.L., et al., Older women and physical activity: Using the telephone to walk. Womens Health Issues, 1997. 7(1): p. 24-29.
 
[19]  Marcus, B.H., et al., Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 1998. 20(3): p. 174-180.
 
[20]  Marcus, B.H., et al., Physical activity interventions using mass media, print media, and information technology. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998. 15(4): p. 362-378.
 
[21]  Marcus, B.H., et al., Using the stages of change model to increase the adoption of physical activity among community participants. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1992. 6(6): p. 424-429.
 
[22]  King, A.C., Community Intervention for Promotion of Physical Activity and Fitness. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 1991. 19(1): p. 211-260.