| [1] | N. H. V. Hung, The cohomology of the Steenrod algebra and representations of the generalinear groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357(2005), 4065-4089. |
| |
| [2] | M. Kameko, Products of projective spaces as Steenrod modules, Thesis Johns Hopkins University, 1990. |
| |
| [3] | T. N. Nam, A-générateurs génériquess pour l’algèbre polynomiale, Adv. Math. 186(2004), 334-362. |
| |
| [4] | F. P. Peterson, Generators of H*(RP∞ × RP∞) as a module over the Steenrod algebra, Abstracts Amer. Math. Soc. No.833 April 1987. |
| |
| [5] | S. Priddy, On characterizing summands in the classifying space of a group, I,Amer. Jour. Math. 112(1990), 737-748. |
| |
| [6] | J. H. Silverman, Hit polynomials and the canonical antimonomorphism of the Steenrod algebra, Proc.Amer.Math.Soc. 123(1995), 627-637. The transfer in homological algebra, Math.Zeit, 202 (1989), 493-523. |
| |
| [7] | W. M. Singer, On the action of the Steenrod squares on polynomial algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 111(1991), 577-583. |
| |
| [8] | N. E. Steenrod, Cohomology operations, Lectures by N. E. Steenrod written and revised by D. B. A. Epstein, Annals of Mathematics, No.50, Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J(1962). |
| |
| [9] | N. Sum, The negative answer to Kameko’s conjecture on the hit problem, Advances in Mathematics,(2010) 225:5, 2365-2390. |
| |
| [10] | N. Sum, On the Peterson hit problem, preprint, 2013, 59pages (submitted). |
| |
| [11] | N. Sum, On the hit problem for the polynomial algebra, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Pari, Ser. I, 351 ( 2013), 565-568. |
| |
| [12] | G. Walker and R. M. W. Wood, Young tableaux and the Steenrod algebra, Proceedings of the International School and Conferenca in Algebraic Topology, Ha Noi 2004, Geom.Topol. Monogr., Geom.Topol. Publ.,Coventry 11(2007), 379-397. |
| |