Hongchun Catchment (Southwest, China) Debrisflow Analysis and Reconstruction: Geomorphological and Coupled Modeling Approaches

Mamodu Adegbe^1, , Ako Thomas Agbor¹, Chukwu. N. Jacinta¹, Waziri. H. Salome¹, Ofor. N. P² and Alhassan Defyan Usman²

¹Department of Geology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger state, Nigeria

²Department of Physics, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger state, Nigeria

Cite this paper:
Mamodu Adegbe, Ako Thomas Agbor, Chukwu. N. Jacinta, Waziri. H. Salome, Ofor. N. P and Alhassan Defyan Usman. Hongchun Catchment (Southwest, China) Debrisflow Analysis and Reconstruction: Geomorphological and Coupled Modeling Approaches. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2015; 3(1):17-23. doi: 10.12691/jgg-3-1-3

Abstract

The Wenchuan earthquake of May, 2008 led to an abundance of loose landslide debris being present on the slopes and in the gullies of Hongchun catchment, South West, China. The debris later served as source material for the July 21^st, 2011 rainfall-induced debris flows in the Hongchun catchment. The main objectives of this research are: to understand the catchment hydrological processes, to inventorize and characterize the landslides bodies as potential sources of debris flow and to reconstruct the debris flow events. Geomorphological mapping of the landslides revealed 38 of them. However, these landslides were characterized according to scarp and body. The geomorphological mapping was supported by field observations and historical knowledge gathered through interviews revealed that the co-seismic landslides were the potential source of debris flows in the catchment. Putting the hydrological processes into perspective, the Limburg soil erosion model (LISEM) shows hydrograph with three peaks corresponding to discharge from rainfall water but produce little runoff. Thus, antecedent rainfall may have saturated the debris/soil on the slope that triggered the debris flow. The LISEM hydrograph from LISEM and Flo-2D models were coupled and reconstructed the debris flow. The debris flow results shows a maximum flow velocity of 2.9m/s, area extent of 975000 km², average flow depth of 11.2 m and impact force of 4,559 N/m². Finally, the debris flow volume of 171,350 m³ representing 80.7% of the total debris flow volume was reconstructed.

Keywords:
debris flow LISEM FLO-2D catchment reconstruction geomorphological landslides

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Cesca, M., &D'Agostino, V. (2006). Comparison between FLO-2D and RAMMS in debris flow Modeling: a case study in the Dolomites. International Conference on Monitoring simulation, prevention and remediation of Dense and Debris flow II, 60, 161-168.
[2]	Huang, R. Q., & Li, W. L. (2008). Analysis of the Geo-hazards Triggered by the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, China. Bull EngGeol Environ, 68(363-371).
[3]	Kowalski, J. (2008). Two-phase Modeling of debris flows. PhD Thesis.Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
[4]	Mamodu. A, Dinand.A, Jetten,V,Ako.T.A, Idris, N.A, Onoduku U.S and Abraham. S.U (2013). Post seismic debris flow modeling using Flo-2D: case study of Yingxiu, Sichuan Pronvince, China: Journal of geography and geology, Canada, 5(3), August, p (101-115).
[5]	Ellen, S. D. (1988). Description and Mechanics of soil slip/Debris flow storms. In: S.D Ellen and G.F.Wieczorek (Editors). Landslides, Floods and Marine Effects of the Storm of January 3-5, 1982, in the San Franscisco Bay Region, Califronia, USGS, Washington.
[6]	CCI and AD. (2003). Debris flow Origin. http://adaptation.nrcan.gc.ca/posters/images/bc_05_02_e.gif. Accessed on: 2012, 05, September.
[7]	Van Beek, L. P. H. (2002). Assessment of the influence of changes in landuse and Climate on Landslide Activity in Mediterranean.PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 363.
[8]	Varnes, D. J. (1978). Slope movement types and processes. In Special Report 176: Landslides: Analysis and control (Eds: Schuster, R.L and Krizek, R.J), Transportation and Road research board, National Academy of Science, Washington D.C. 11-33.
[9]	Crosta, G. B., &Frattini, P. (2003). Distributed Modeling of Shallow Landslides Triggered by Intense Rainfall. Nat Hazards and Earth System Science, 3, 81-93.
[10]	Van Asch, T. W. J., Buma, J., & Van Beek, L. P. H. (1999).A Review on Some hydrological triggering systems in Landslides. Geomorphology, 30(25-32).
[11]	Inverion, R. M. (1997). The Physics of Debris Flow.Reviews of Geophysics.35(3), 245-296
[12]	Aleotti, P. (2004). A Warning System for Rainfall-induced Shallow failures. Engineering Geology, 73. (3-4), 247-265
[13]	Glade, T., Michael, C., & peters, S. (2000). Applying Probability Determination to Refine Landslide-Triggering Rainfall Thresholds Using an Empirical Antecedent Rainfall Model.Pure and Applied Geophysics, 157, 1059-1079.
[14]	Christen, M., Kowalski, J., &Bartelt, P. (2010). RAMMS: Numerical Simulation of Dense snow-avalanches in three dimensional terrains.Cold Regions Science and Technology, 63(1-2)(1-14).
[15]	Quan Luna, B. (2007). Assessment and Modeling of two Lahars caused by 'Hurricane Stan' at Atitlan, Guatemala, October, 2005. MSc. Thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo.
[16]	Tang, C., Zhu, J., Qi, X., & Ding, J. (2011). Landslides Induced by the Wenchuan earthquake and the subsequent rainfall event. A case study of in the Beichuan area of China Engineering Geology, 12.
[17]	Jetten, V. (2002). LISEM user manual. The Netherlands, Utrecht Centre for Environmental and Landscape Dynamics, Utrecht University.
[18]	O'Brien, J. S., Julien, P. Y., & Fullerton, W. T. (1993). Two-dimensional water flood and Mudflow simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 119(2), 244-261.
[19]	Nilson, T. H., Taylor, F. A., and Dean, R. M. (1976). Natural conditions that control landsliding in the San Francisco Bay Region. U. S. Geological Survey, Bulletin 1424.