Gravity Modelling and Structural Characterization of the Korosi–Chepchuk Geothermal Fields in Baringo, Kenya

Chelangat Hellen¹, Namaswa Solomon^1, and Munyithya James²

¹Multimedia University of Kenya, Department of Physics, Nairobi, Kenya

²Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Department of Physics, Nairobi, Kenya

Cite this paper:
Chelangat Hellen, Namaswa Solomon and Munyithya James. Gravity Modelling and Structural Characterization of the Korosi–Chepchuk Geothermal Fields in Baringo, Kenya. Journal of Geosciences and Geomatics. 2025; 13(3):52-56. doi: 10.12691/jgg-13-3-1

Abstract

Exploration and exploitation of geothermal resources is a very high-risk venture with high upfront costs. Hence, a clear understanding of the subsurface structural controls is more important in the development of a geothermal system. In this study, gravity data was processed to remove all the variations which do not result from the effects of underlying masses. Using the Golden Surfer Software, a grid and bouguer anomaly map was generated. To separate regional and residual anomalies and also remove effects of noise, the gridded data in Geosoft Oasis Montaj Software was subjected to band pass filter, high pass filter, upward continuation and both first order vertical and horizontal derivatives. The respective anomaly maps were plotted and analyzed. Finally, a gravity profile was obtained across the anomaly and 2D forward modelling performed. From the analysis, it was observed that there were two peaks, one at the Korosi and other at Chepchuk which are interpreted as the magma intrusions appearing at the depth of approximately 3km. Linear gravity gradients were also detected trending NE-SW direction which are possibly the Nakaporon and Nagoreti faults. Two target wells expected to be more productive in the area could be decided.

Keywords:
gravity structural controls faults gradient bouguer anomaly Korosi-Chepchuk geothermal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Riedl, M., Strecker, M. R., Olaka, L. A., Mtelela, K., &Wamalwa, A. (2022). Mid‐Pleistocene to recent crustal extension in the inner graben of the northern Kenya Rift. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 23(3), e2021GC010123.
[2]	Warega, J. A., Githiri, J. G., &Ambusso, W. J. (2020). Geothermal prospecting of Olkaria Dome areas in Naivasha, Nakuru County, Kenya, using gravity method. Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 4, 190.
[3]	Hinze, W. J., Von Frese, R. R., and Saad, A. H. (2013). Gravity and magnetic exploration: Principles, practices, and applications. Cambridge University Press.
[4]	Renaut, R. A., Hogue, J. D., &Vatankhah, S. (2020). A fast methodology for large-scale focusing inversion of gravity and magnetic data using the structured model matrix and the 2D fast Fourier transform. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13904.
[5]	Aydın, N. G., &İşseven, T. (2024). Gravity modelling by using vertical prismatic polyhedra and application to a sedimentary basin in Eastern Anatolia. Near Surface Geophysics, 22(3), 383–401.
[6]	Sippel, J., Meeßen, C., Cacace, M., Mechie, J., Fishwick, S., Heine, C., ... and Strecker, M. R. (2017). The Kenya rift revisited: insights into lithospheric strength through data-driven 3-D gravity and thermal modeling. Solid Earth, 8(1), 45-46.
[7]	Namaswa, S.W., Ambusso, W.J. and Migwi, C.M., (2014). Gravity variation across Nakaporon fault in Korosi geothermal prospecting field. The International Journal of Science and Technology, 2(8), 121-124.
[8]	JICA. (2010). Project for reviewing GDC's geothermal development strategy: Final report (Vol. 1). Japan International Cooperation Agency.
[9]	Lichoro, C.M, Árnason, K. and Cumming, K., (2019). Joint interpretation of gravity and resistivity data from the Northern Kenya volcanic rift zone: structural and geothermal significance. Geothermics (2019)