Quantifying the Effects of Agricultural Autarky Policy: Resilience to Yield Volatility and Export Restrictions

Tetsuji Tanaka^1, and Jin Guo¹

¹Department of Economics, Setsunan University, 17-8 Ikedanaka, Neyagawa, Osaka, 572-0074, Japan

Cite this paper:
Tetsuji Tanaka and Jin Guo. Quantifying the Effects of Agricultural Autarky Policy: Resilience to Yield Volatility and Export Restrictions. Journal of Food Security. 2019; 7(2):47-57. doi: 10.12691/jfs-7-2-4

Abstract

In the wake of the 2007–2008 global food crisis, various national governmental bodies aimed at increasing their food self-sufficiency to stabilize their domestic markets. Despite the fact that food self-sufficiency is a long-standing policy discussion issue, its effectiveness has not been fully scrutinized with a quantitative modeling approach. Japan’s government rigorously protects domestic agricultural producers on the grounds of national food security and, hence, has grappled with enhancing the country’s food self-sufficiency, even though economists have strongly argue against this, in terms of the inefficiency of resource allocation. This study developed a stochastic world trade computable general equilibrium model to quantify the benefit/loss of wheat autarky policies for Japan against wheat yield shocks and export bans. It was found that the comprehensive economic burden to materialize full self-sufficiency in wheat is approximately $8700 million, regardless of which of the two methods of market intervention––increasing the import tariff or subsidizing production--is used. Greater self-sufficiency causes higher volatility in the domestic wheat price due to the yield variability in exporting nations being more destabilized than that in exporting countries. Also, the autarky strategies almost halve the welfare deterioration induced by export restrictions, although it does not pay for the implementation cost.

Keywords:
food self-sufficiency food policy agricultural yield export restrictions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Bellemare, M., 2014. Rising food prices, food price volatility, and social unrest. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 97(1), 1-21.
[2]	Clapp, J., 2017. Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy 66, 83-96.
[3]	Tanaka, T., 2018. Agricultural Self-sufficiency and Market Stability: A Revenue-neutral Approach to Wheat Sector in Egypt. Journal of Food Security 6.
[4]	Tanaka, T., Hosoe, N., 2011. Does agricultural trade liberalization increase risks of supply-side uncertainty?: Effects of productivity shocks and export restrictions on welfare and food supply in Japan. Food Policy 36, 368-377.
[5]	Devarajan, S., Lewis, J.D., Robinson, S., 1990. Policy lessons from trade-focused, two sector models. Journal of Policy Modelling 12(4), 625-657.
[6]	Erhan, G.Ü., Karapinar, B., Tanaka, T., 2018. Welfare-at-Risk and Extreme Dependency of Regional Wheat Yields: Implications of a Stochastic CGE Model. Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(1), 18-34.
[7]	Valenzuela, E., Hertel, T.W., Keeney, R., Remimer, J., 2007. Assessing Global Computable General Equilibrium Model Validity Using Agricultural Price Volatility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(2), 383-397.
[8]	Fayaad, B.S., Johnson, S.R., El-Khishin, M., 1995. Consumer Demand for Major Foods in Egypt. CARD Working Papers 214. Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/card_workingpapers/214 (Accessed 10 Jan 2018).
[9]	Armington, P.S., 1969. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Paper 16(1), 159-178.
[10]	Hertel, T. W. (Ed.), 1997. Global Trade Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge