Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Default Risk in State-Owned Enterprises: A Comparative Analysis of Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Sectors

Chih-Hsing Hung¹, Chien-Ho Lin^2, , Ching-Hong Wang³ and Chin-Ming Chen⁴

¹Chih-Hsing Hung, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

²Chien-Ho Lin, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

³Ching-Hong Wang, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

⁴Chin-Ming Chen, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Cite this paper:
Chih-Hsing Hung, Chien-Ho Lin, Ching-Hong Wang and Chin-Ming Chen. Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Default Risk in State-Owned Enterprises: A Comparative Analysis of Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Sectors. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2026; 14(1):32-38. doi: 10.12691/jfe-14-1-3

Abstract

This study examines the association between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and a default-risk proxy for Taiwanese state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Using Bloomberg financial data, Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) ESG ratings, and 147 firm-year observations from 2015 to 2021, we estimate ordinary least squares models separately for manufacturing and non-manufacturing SOEs. Higher total ESG scores (TESG) are positively associated with Altman Z-scores in both sectors in the controlled specifications, implying lower default risk, although the manufacturing coefficient changes sign across model specifications. At the dimensional level, higher environmental (E) scores are associated with lower Z-scores in manufacturing SOEs, whereas the corresponding association for non-manufacturing SOEs becomes statistically insignificant after additional covariates are included. The pooled full-sample analysis likewise yields an insignificant E-score coefficient in the controlled model. Social (S) and governance (G) scores are generally insignificant. Overall, the evidence indicates that the ESG-default-risk relationship is sector- and specification-dependent, and that the negative environmental association is concentrated in manufacturing SOEs. The findings inform the design of sector-sensitive sustainability policies while underscoring the need for cautious causal interpretation.

Keywords:
ESG default risk TESG score state-owned enterprises Altman Z-score

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world.
[2]	United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). Available: https:// sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
[3]	Mănescu, C. (2011). Stock returns in relation to environmental, social and governance performance: Mispricing or compensation for risk? Sustainable Development, 19(2), 95-118.
[4]	Bekaert, G., Rothenberg, R., & Noguer, M. (2023). Sustainable investment: Exploring the linkage between alpha, ESG, and SDGs. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3831-3842.
[5]	National Council for Sustainable Development. (2021). 2021 annual report on national sustainable development.Available: https:// ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/_ofu/ Download/en/home/ 2021Annual% 20Report%20on% 20National% 20Sustainable% 20Development%20% 28PDF%29.pdf.
[6]	Financial Supervisory Commission. (2022, April 11). FSC issues 'Sustainable Development Guidemap for TWSE and TPEx Listed Companies'. Available: https:// www.fsc.gov.tw/ en/home.jsp? dataserno =202204110001& dtable=Bulletin& id=74& mcustomize= multimessage_view. jsp&parentpath=0,2.
[7]	Di Tommaso, C., & Thornton, J. (2020). Do ESG scores effect bank risk taking and value? Evidence from European banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2286-2298.
[8]	Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56-64.
[9]	Altman, E. I., Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M., Laitinen, E. K., & Suvas, A. (2017). Financial distress prediction in an international context: A review and empirical analysis of Altman's Z-score model. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 28(2), 131-171.
[10]	Shi, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Bankruptcy prediction for the European aviation industry: An application of the Altman model. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(1), 477-491.
[11]	OECD. (2015). OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises, 2015 edition. OECD Publishing.
[12]	Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A theory of privatisation. The Economic Journal, 106(435), 309-319.
[13]	La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265-301
[14]	Sun, Q., Tong, W. H., & Tong, J. (2002). How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China's privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1-2), 1-27.
[15]	Lin, J. Y., & Li, Z. (2008). Policy burden, privatization and soft budget constraint. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(1), 90-102.
[16]	Wei, C. (2021). State ownership and target setting: Evidence from publicly listed companies in China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1925-1960.
[17]	Saidane, D., & Abdallah, S. B. (2021). African firm default risk and CSR. Finance Research Letters, 43, 101964.
[18]	Musacchio, A., Lazzarini, S. G., & Aguilera, R. V. (2015). New varieties of state capitalism: Strategic and governance implications. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 115-131.
[19]	Fang, M., & Ruan, R. (2023). State-owned enterprises in China as macroeconomic stabilizers: Their special function in times of economic policy uncertainty. China & World Economy, 31(5), 87-115.
[20]	Millward, R. (2005). Private and public enterprise in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
[21]	Millward, R. (2011). Public enterprise in the modern western world: An historical analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(4), 375-398.
[22]	Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
[23]	Meng, T., Yahya, M. H. D. H., Ashhari, Z. M., & Yu, D. (2023). ESG performance, investor attention, and company reputation: Threshold model analysis based on panel data from listed companies in China. Heliyon, 9(10), e20974.
[24]	Kong, W. (2023). The impact of ESG performance on debt financing costs: Evidence from Chinese family business. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103949.
[25]	Amoa-Gyarteng, K. (2019). Financial characteristics of distressed firms: An application of the Altman algorithm model. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 30(1), 63-76.
[26]	Tung, D. T., & Phung, V. T. H. (2019). An application of Altman Z-score model to analyze the bankruptcy risk: Cases of multidisciplinary enterprises in Vietnam. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 16(4), 181-191.