Journal of Finance and Economics
ISSN (Print): 2328-7284 ISSN (Online): 2328-7276 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jfe Editor-in-chief: Suman Banerjee
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Finance and Economics. 2024, 12(1), 1-14
DOI: 10.12691/jfe-12-1-1
Open AccessArticle

Univariate and Multivariate Volatility Models for Portfolio Value at Risk

Jingyi Xiao1, Siqi Mao1, , Xufeng Niu1 and Yixin Kang1

1Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA

Pub. Date: February 02, 2024

Cite this paper:
Jingyi Xiao, Siqi Mao, Xufeng Niu and Yixin Kang. Univariate and Multivariate Volatility Models for Portfolio Value at Risk. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2024; 12(1):1-14. doi: 10.12691/jfe-12-1-1

Abstract

In modern day financial risk management, modeling and forecasting stock return movements via their conditional volatilities, particularly predicting the Value at Risk (VaR), became increasingly more important for a healthy economical environment. In this paper, we evaluate and compare two main families of models for the conditional volatilities - GARCH - in terms of their VaR prediction performance of 5 major US stock indices. We calculate GARCH-type model parameters via Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation (QMLE). Since financial volatilities are moving together across assets and markets, it becomes apparent that modeling the volatilities in a multivariate framework of modeling is more appropriate. However, existing studies in the literature do not present compelling evidence for a strong preference between univariate and multivariate models. In this paper we also address the problem of forecasting portfolio VaR via multivariate GARCH models versus univariate GARCH models. We construct 3 portfolios with stock returns of 3 major US stock indices, 6 major banks and 6 major technical companies respectively. For each portfolio, we model the portfolio conditional covariances with GARCH, EGARCH and MGARCH-BEKK, MGARCH-DCC, and GO-GARCH models. For each estimated model, the forecast portfolio volatilities are further used to calculate (portfolio) VaR. The ability to capture the portfolio volatilities is evaluated by MAE and RMSE; the VaR prediction performance is tested through a two-stage backtesting procedure and compared in terms of the loss function. The results of our study indicate that even though MGARCH models are better in predicting the volatilities of some portfolios, GARCH models could perform as well as their multivariate (and computationally more demanding) counterparts.

Keywords:
Value at Risk (VaR) GARCH-type Model Multivariate GARCH models

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Cappiello, Lorenzo, Robert F. Engle, and Kevin Sheppard. "Asymmetric dynamics in the correlations of global equity and bond returns." Journal of Financial econometrics 4.4 (2006): 537-572.
 
[2]  Alexander, Gordon. (2009). From Markowitz to modern risk management. European Journal of Finance. 15. 451-461. 10.1080/13518470902853566.
 
[3]  Philippe Jorion (2006), Value at Risk: The New benchmark to manage financial risk, second edition.
 
[4]  Gallon and Gomez (2007). Conditional Distribution of the Colombian Exchange Rate Returns: An Empirical Exercise Using Multivariate GARCH Models. Revista de Economia del Rosario, Vol. 10, No. 2, December 2007.
 
[5]  Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 987-1007.
 
[6]  Tim Bollerslev (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics. Journal of Econometrics Volume 31, Issue 3, April 1986.
 
[7]  Daniel B. Nelson (1991). Conditional Heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach, Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 2 (Mar., 1991), pp. 347-370.
 
[8]  Bollerslev, T., Engle, R. F., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1988). A capital asset pricing model with time-varying covariances. Journal of political Economy, 96(1), 116-131.
 
[9]  Engle, R. F., & Kroner, K. F. (1995). Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized Arch. Econometric Theory, 11(1), 122–150.
 
[10]  Caporin, M., & McAleer, M. (2014). Robust ranking of multivariate GARCH models by problem dimension. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 76, 172-185.
 
[11]  Luc Bauwens, Bastien Laurent, Jeroen V. K. Rombouts (2006). Multivariate GARCH models: A Survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Volume21, Issue1, January/February 2006, Pages79-109.
 
[12]  Roy Van Der Weide (2002). GO-GARCH: A Multivariate Generalized Orthogonal GARCH Model. Econ. 17: 549564 (2002).
 
[13]  Tim Bollerslev (1990). Modelling the Coherence in Short-Run Nominal Exchange Rates: A Multivariate Generalized Arch Model. The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 72(3), pages 498-505, August.
 
[14]  Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. Journal of business & economic statistics, 339-350.
 
[15]  Tse, Y. K., & Tsui, A. K. C. (2002). A multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model with time-varying correlations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 351-362.
 
[16]  French, Kenneth R., G. William Schwert, and Robert F. Stambaugh. "Expected stock returns and volatility." Journal of financial Economics 19.1 (1987): 3-29.
 
[17]  Robert F. Engle and Victor K. Ng (1993). Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 5 (Dec., 1993).
 
[18]  Gouriéroux, C. (1997). ARCH models and financial applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
 
[19]  Jose A. Lopez (1998) Methods for Evaluating Value-at-Risk Estimates. Economic Policy Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, October 1998.
 
[20]  Christoffersen, P. (2008). Evaluating Interval Forecasts. International Economic Review. Vol. 39, No. 4.
 
[21]  Perry Sadorsky (2006). Modeling and Forecasting Petroleum Futures Volatility. Energy Economics, 2006, vol. 28, issue 4, 467-488.
 
[22]  Kupiec P. (1995). Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Management Models. The Journal of DerivativesWinter 1995,3(2)73-84.
 
[23]  Tsay, R. S. (2014). An introduction to analysis of financial data with R. John Wiley & Sons.
 
[24]  Yuliya Plyakha et al. (2012). Why Does an Equal-Weighted Portfolio Outperform Value- and Price-Weighted Portfolios? SSRN Electronic Journal. October 2012.
 
[25]  Manuela Braione, Nicolas K. Scholtes (2016). Forecasting Value-at-Risk under Different Distributional Assumptions. Econometrics 2016.
 
[26]  Alain-Philippe Fortin, Jean-Guy Simonato and Georges Dionne (2018). Forecasting Expected Shortfall: Should we use a Multivariate Model for Stock Market Factors? Working Papers18-4, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
 
[27]  Rui Luo et al. (2018). A Neural Stochastic Volatility Model. arXiv:1712.00504v2 [cs.LG].
 
[28]  Chen, D. Q., Mao, S. Q., & Niu, X. F. (2023). Tests and classification methods in adaptive designs with applications. Journal of Applied Statistics, 50(6), 1334-1357.
 
[29]  Li, Y., Mao, S., Yuan, Y., Wang, Z., Kang, Y., & Yao, Y. (2023). Beyond Tides and Time: Machine Learning’s Triumph in Water Quality Forecasting. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 11(3), 89-97.
 
[30]  Mao, S., Yuan, Y., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Yao, Y., & Kang, Y. (2023). Room Occupancy Prediction: Exploring the Power of Machine Learning and Temporal Insights. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14426.
 
[31]  Mao, S. (2022). Time Series and Machine Learning Models for Financial Markets Forecast. The Florida State University.