Analyzing the Performance of Ten Socially Responsible Mutual Funds

Mary H. Lesser^1,

¹Charles M. Snipes College of Business and Economics, Lenoir-Rhyne University, Hickory, NC 28601, USA

Cite this paper:
Mary H. Lesser. Analyzing the Performance of Ten Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2022; 10(3):68-74. doi: 10.12691/jfe-10-3-3

Abstract

Studies have considered fund family effects on fund performance. This study examines fund family effects by building on the work of Kathman [1] comparing the performance of five funds with a broad SRI (or ESG) mandate that belong to a family of funds that specialize in this area to five funds that have focused mandates but do not belong to such families and are stand-alone products. The objective is to see if being part of a larger family or not affects the performance of the funds. The of the two groups of funds are analyzed using the CAPM, Fama-French, and four-factor models, as well as the tests required on the entire sample. Building on the work of Gil-Bazo et al. [3] and on that of Phillips et al. [3], this study further investigates whether there are differences between SRI funds based on the “family” to which they belong. The most interesting contribution of this study is the comparison between the two groups of funds. One might expect the funds from specialty firms to have some advantage due to economies of scale or returns on accumulated expertise. However, the Chow test indicates that there are significant differences between the two groups and analysis shows that the five funds from the non-specialty firms is the better performer.

Keywords:
social conscience investing mutual funds

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Kathman, D. (2013). Find the right socially responsible fund. Morningstar.
[2]	Gil-Bazo, J., Ruiz-Verdú, P., & Santos, A. A. P. (2008). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: The role of fees and management companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 243-263.
[3]	Phillips, B., Pukthuanthong, K., & Rau, P. R. (2013, August). Size doesn’t matter: Diseconomies of scale in the mutual fund industry revisited. http://www.aidea2013.it/docs/79_aidea2013_banking-and-finance.pdf.
[4]	McGee, S. (2013, December 16). Amy dominie: Investing with a social conscience. The Guardian.com. http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/dec/16/amy-domini-investing-with-a-social-conscience.
[5]	Faw, L. (2012, October 23). Are millennials lazy or avant-garde social activists? ForbesWoman. http://www.forbes.com/sites/larissafaw/2012/10/23/are-millennials-lazy-or-avant-garde-social-activists/.
[6]	Edwards, E., & Samant, A. (2003). Investing with a conscience: An evaluation of the risk-adjusted performance of socially responsible mutual funds. American Journal of Business, 18(1), 51-60.
[7]	Statman, M. (2005, January). Socially responsible indexes: Composition and performance. http://ssrn.com/abstract=705344.
[8]	Geczy, C. C., Stambaugh, R. F., & Levin, D. (2005, October). Investing in socially responsible mutual funds. Working paper March 2003. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=416380.
[9]	Ter Horst, J., Zhang, C., & Renneboog, L. (2007, June). Socially responsible investments: Methodology, risk exposure and performance. TILEC discussion paper no. 2007-013; ECGI - Finance working paper no. 175/2007. http://ssrn.com/abstract=985267.
[10]	Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
[11]	Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
[12]	Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.