Board Structure and Stock Liquidity: An Empirical Study on Nairobi Securities Exchange

David Magaki Bichanga^1, , Florence Memba¹ and Agnes Njeru¹

¹School of Business and entrepreneurship, Department of Economics, Accounting and Finance, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, P.O. BOX 62, 000, 00200, Nairobi, Kenya

Cite this paper:
David Magaki Bichanga, Florence Memba and Agnes Njeru. Board Structure and Stock Liquidity: An Empirical Study on Nairobi Securities Exchange. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2021; 9(2):77-82. doi: 10.12691/jfe-9-2-5

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to assess the influence of board structure on the stock liquidity of firms listed at the Nairobi securities exchange. Stock market plays a crucial role in the country’s economy in that it serves as a financial market avenue to enhance openness, create trust and ensure increased firm competitiveness. The success of stock market however highly depends on its ability to trade large size quickly at low cost. This is the ease of buying and selling large quantities of shares in a stock market while not bringing any effect on the prices. The board structure has been found to play a key role as an aspect of corporate governance on firms’ financial performance but its role still remains unclear on stock liquidity of listed firms at the NSE. The study was anchored on the agency theory. It is on this merit that this paper sought to investigate the influence of board structure on stock liquidity of firms listed at the NSE. A census was carried out where all the target population comprised of the 68 firms listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. The study used secondary data obtained from the Nairobi securities exchange and the respective firms’ publications annual financial statements using a data collection sheet. Data analysis was done by the use of Eviews 7. The findings indicated that board structure had negative and significant influence on stock liquidity when measured by turnover but no significant influence when measured by quoted spread, illiquidity and liquidity ratio.

Keywords:
board structure stock liquidity Nairobi Securities Exchange

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Ferreira, D., & Kirchmaier, T. Corporate Board in Europe: Size, independence and gender diversity. In Boards and Shareholders in European Listed Companies: Facts, Context and Post – Crisis Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[2]	Akisik, O., & Gal, “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and Internal Control on Stakeholder view of the Firm and Financial Performance”. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 246-280, 2017.
[3]	Linck, J., Wetter, J., & Yang, T., “The determinants of board structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 308-328, 2008.
[4]	Jensen, M., “The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems”. Journal of Finance, 48, pp. 831-880, 1993.
[5]	Russell Reynolds Associates. What makes an effective UK board? Views from FTSE Chairmen. Retrieved from http://www.non – execs.com/associates/features/russellReynolds.asp
[6]	Heidrick, G., & Struggles, J., Towards Dynamic Governance 2014: European Corporate Governance Report. London: International Corporate Governance Network.
[7]	Mitnick, B., Origin of theory of agency: an account by one of theory’s originators. SSRN 1020378 2019 papers.ssrn.com, 1973.
[8]	Ross, S., “The Economic Theory of Agency: The principal’s problem”. The American Economic Review JSTOR, 1973.
[9]	Jensen, M, & Meckling, W., “Theory of the firm: Management behavior, agency costs and ownership structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), pp. 305-360, 1976.
[10]	Fame, E., & Jensen, M., “Separation of ownership and control”. The Journal of Law and Economics, 8 (1), 301-326, 1983.
[11]	Okumu, F., Corporate governance and firm value for firms listed at the Nairobi securities exchange. Nairobi: MBA project, University of Nairobi, 2015.
[12]	Wepukhulu, J., Relationship between corporate governance and performance of commercial banks in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: PhD Thesis, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), 2016.
[13]	CBK, Prudential guidelines 2017, Nairobi: Central Bank of Kenya. Retrieved from https:// www.centralbank.go.ke, 2017.
[14]	Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thorn hill, A., Research methods for business students, (4th Edition), London, England: Prentice, 2007.
[15]	Mugenda, M., & Mugenda, G., Research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Nairobi: ACT Press, 2009.
[16]	Goyenko, Y., Holden, W., & Trzcinka, A., “Do liquidity measures measure liquidity?” Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 82-112, 2009.
[17]	Hasbrouck, J., “Trading costs and returns for us equities: Estimating effective costs from daily data”. The Journal of Finance, 64, 1445-1477, 2009.
[18]	Karolyi, G., Lee, K., & Van Dijk, M., “Understanding commonality in liquidity around the World”. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 82-112, 2012.
[19]	Uyaebo, S., & Usman, F., “Application of Asymmetric GRACH Models”. Journal of Applied Statistics, 134-160, 2015.
[20]	Kahuthu, W., The effect of stock market liquidity on stock returns of companies listed on Nairobi securities exchange (Thesis). Nairobi: Strathmore University. Retrieved from http://suplus. Strathmore.edu/handle/11071/5594, 2017.
[21]	Nadia, B., Abdelfatteh, B., & Jean, P., “Corporate governance and market microstructure: Evidence on institutional investors in the Tunisian stock exchange”, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 62-75, April, 2014.
[22]	Searat, A., Benjamin, L., & Jen, S., Corporate governance and stock liquidity. Griffith University Australia, 2015.