Complexities in Performance Measurement and the Reaction of Actors: The Case of Tanzania

Mkasiwa T.A^1, and Gasper A.F¹

¹The Institute of Finance Management, Tanzania

Cite this paper:
Mkasiwa T.A and Gasper A.F. Complexities in Performance Measurement and the Reaction of Actors: The Case of Tanzania. Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2014; 2(3):41-50. doi: 10.12691/jfa-2-3-1

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to explore the challenges and complexities of performance measures which caused less than desired behavior in the Tanzanian Local Government Authorities (LGAs). Specifically, the paper focuses on performance measures under the Local Government Development Grant (LGDG) system. The LGDG was the performance based grant system established to link LGAs’ performances and their financing. The methodology of the research incorporates review of LGDG documents, field-based interviews and observation. The results are interpreted using the law of decreasing effectiveness (de Bruijn and Van Helden, 2007) and Oliver (1991)’s strategic responses to institutional pressure. The study provides a more detailed analysis of the law of decreasing effectiveness and contributes by adding a component of complexity, to contribute to the causes of pervasive effect. The paper also explains how acquiescence and manipulation strategies (Oliver, 1991) can occur concurrently.

Keywords:
performance measures NPM tanzania local governments law of decreasing effectiveness

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Adcroft, A. and Willis, R. (2005). "The (Un)Intended Outcome of Public Sector Performance Measurement." International Journal of Public Sector Management 18 (5): 386-400.
[2]	Allen, R., Schiavo-Campo, S. and Garrity, T.C. (2004). Assessing and Reforming of Public Financial Management: A New Approach, World Bank Publications.
[3]	Amernic, J.H. (1996). "The Rhetoric Versus the Reality, or Is the Reality “Mere” Rhetoric? A Case Study of Public Accounting Firms' Responses to a Company's Invitation for Alternative Opinions on an Accounting Matter." Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7 (1): 57-75.
[4]	Behn, R.D. (2003). "Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures." Public Administration Review 63 (5): 586-606.
[5]	Brignall, S. and Modell, S. (2000). "An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the ‘New Public Sector’." Management Accounting Research 11 (3): 281-306.
[6]	Caiden, N. (1998). A New Generation of Budget Reform. Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms. B. G. Peters and D. J. Savoie. Canada, Canadian Centre for Management Development and McGill-Queen’s University Press: 252-284.
[7]	Chang, L. (2006). "Managerial Responses to Externally Imposed Performance Measurement in the Nhs: An Institutional Theory Perspective." Financial Accountability & Management 22 (1): 63-85.
[8]	de Bruijn, H. (2002). "Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Strategies to Cope with the Risks of Performance Measurement." International Journal of Public Sector Management 15 (7): 578-594.
[9]	De Bruijn, H. (2007). Managing Performance in the Public Sector. London, Routledge.
[10]	de Bruijn, H. and Van Helden, G.J. (2007). "A Plea for Dialogue Driven Performance Based Management Systems: Evidence from the Dutch Public Sector." Financial Accountability & Management 22 (4): 405-423.
[11]	DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields." American sociological review 48 (2): 147-160.
[12]	DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983). "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields." American Sociological Review: 147-160.
[13]	Dye, R.A. (2002). "Classifications Manipulation and Nash Accounting Standards." Journal of Accounting Research 40 (4): 1125-1162.
[14]	Eden, R. and Hyndman, N. (1999). "Performance Measurement in the Uk Public Sector: Poisoned Chalice or Holy Grail?" Optimum, The Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (1): 9-15.
[15]	Frølich, N. (2008). The Politics of Steering by Numbers: Debating Performance-Based Funding in Europe. RAPPORT 3/2008.
[16]	Gasper, F. and Mkasiwa, T. (2013). "Managing Performance or Legitimacy? The Case of Tanzanian Local Government Authorities." Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 6 (2).
[17]	Groot, T. (1999). "Budgetary Reforms in the Non-Profit Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Experiences in Health Care and Higher Education in the Netherlands." Financial Accountability & Management 15 (3&4): 353-376.
[18]	Halachmi, A. (2012). "Mandated Performance Measurement: A Help or a Hindrance?" National Productivity Review 18 (2): 59-67.
[19]	Hatry, H.P. (2013). "Sorting the Relationships among Performance Measurement, Program Evaluation, and Performance Management." New Directions for Evaluation 2013 (137): 19-32.
[20]	Hood, C. (1995). "The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme." Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2): 93-109.
[21]	Johnsen, Å. (2005). "What Does 25 Years of Experience Tell Us About the State of Performance Measurement in Public Policy and Management?" Public Money and Management 25 (1): 9-17.
[22]	Joyce, P.G. (1993). "Using Performance Measures for Federal Budgeting: Proposals and Prospects." Public Budgeting & Finance 13 (4): 3-17.
[23]	Joyce, P.G. (1993). "Using Performance Measures for Federal Budgeting: Proposals and Prospects." Public Budgeting and Finance 13 (4): 3-17.
[24]	Kloot, L. and Martin, J. (2000). "Strategic Performance Management: A Balanced Approach to Performance Management Issues in Local Government." Management Accounting Research 11 (2): 231-251.
[25]	Kravchuk, R.S. and Schack, R.W. (1996). "Designing Effective Performance-Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993." Public Administration Review: 348-358.
[26]	Lapsley, I. (1999). "Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Efficiency or a Rationalising Modernity?" Financial accountability and Management 15 (3 & 4): 201-207.
[27]	Lapsley, I. (2008). "The Npm Agenda: Back to the Future." Financial Accountability & Management 24 (1): 77-96.
[28]	Lapsley, I. (2008). "The Npm Agenda: Back to the Future." Financial Accountability and Management 24 (1): 77-96.
[29]	Lawton, A., McKevitt, D. and Millar, M. (2000). "Developments: Coping with Ambiguity: Reconciling External Legitimacy and Organizational Implementation in Performance Measurement." Public Money and Management 20 (3): 13-20.
[30]	Lee Jr, R.D. and Burns, R.C. (2002). "Performance Measurement in State Budgeting: Advancement and Backsliding from 1990 to 1995." Public Budgeting & Finance 20 (1): 38-54.
[31]	Leeuw, F.L. (1996). "Performance Auditing, New Public Management and Performance Improvement: Questions and Answers." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 9 (2): 92-102.
[32]	Melkers, J. and Willoughby, K. (2005). "Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects." Public Administration Review 65 (2): 180-190.
[33]	Melkers, J. and Willoughby, K. (2005). "Models of Performance‐Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects." Public Administration Review 65 (2): 180-190.
[34]	Mkasiwa, T. (2011). Accounting Changes and Budgeting Practices in the Tanzanian Central Government: A Theory of Struggling for Conformance, University of Southampton.
[35]	Modell, S. and Wiesel, F. (2008). "Marketization and Performance Measurement in Swedish Central Government: A Comparative Institutionalist Study." Abacus 44 (3): 251-283.
[36]	Mserembo, P.K. and Hopper, T. (2004). Public Sector Financial Reform in Malawi: Ppbs in a Poor Country. Research on Accounting in Emerging Economies: Supplement 2, Accounting and Accountability in Emerging and Transition Economies. T. Hopper and Z. Hoque, Elsevier, Oxford: 559-583.
[37]	Norreklit, H. (2000). "The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard a Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions." Management Accounting Research 11 (1): 65-88.
[38]	Nyhan, R.C. and Marlowe Jr, H.A. (1995). "Performance Measurement in the Public Sector: Challenges and Opportunities." Public Productivity & Management Review: 333-348.
[39]	Oliver, C. (1991). "Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes." Academy of management review: 145-179.
[40]	Olson, O., Humphrey, C. and Guthrie, J. (2001). "Caught in an Evaluatory Trap: A Dilemma for Public Services under Npfm." European accounting review 10 (3): 505-522.
[41]	Poister, T.H. and Streib, G. (1999). "Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice." Public Administration Review: 325-335.
[42]	Powell, A.A., White, K.M., Partin, M.R., Halek, K., Christianson, J.B., Neil, B., Hysong, S.J., Zarling, E.J. and Bloomfield, H.E. (2012). "Unintended Consequences of Implementing a National Performance Measurement System into Local Practice." Journal of general internal medicine: 1-8.
[43]	Propper, C. and Wilson, D. (2003). "The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector." Oxford review of economic policy 19 (2): 250-267.
[44]	Schroeder, L. (2001). "Social Funds and Local Government: The Case of Malawi." Public Administration and Development 20 (5): 423-438.
[45]	Suchman, M.C. (1995). "Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches." Academy of management review: 571-610.
[46]	Therkildsen, O. (2000). "Public Sector Reform in a Poor, Aid-Dependent Country, Tanzania." Public Administration and Development 20 (1): 61-71.
[47]	Trussel, J. (2003). "Assessing Potential Accounting Manipulation: The Financial Characteristics of Charitable Organizations with Higher Than Expected Program-Spending Ratios." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32 (4): 616-634.
[48]	UNCDF (2010). Performance-Based Grant Systems: Concept and International Experience UNCDF.
[49]	Vakkuri, J. and Meklin, P. (2006). "Ambiguity in Performance Measurement: A Theoretical Approach to Organisational Uses of Performance Measurement." Financial Accountability & Management 22 (3): 235-250.
[50]	Van Thiel, S. and Leeuw, F.L. (2002). "The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector." Public Performance & Management Review: 267-281.