Towards a Practical Accounting Approach for Heritage Assets: An Alternative Reporting Model for the NPM Practices

Hassan A. G. Ouda^1,

¹German University in Cairo (GUC)

Cite this paper:
Hassan A. G. Ouda. Towards a Practical Accounting Approach for Heritage Assets: An Alternative Reporting Model for the NPM Practices. Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2014; 2(2):19-33. doi: 10.12691/jfa-2-2-1

Abstract

In the last 25 years, financial reporting of Heritage Assets has become a highly problematic issue for the public sector entities holding those assets. Based on the New Public Management (NPM) practices, these entities are required to report to stakeholders on a model disclosing the economic values for all assets under their control. Whilst there exists an extensive prior literature focused on how heritage assets might be accounted for and whether the heritage assets are sufficiently different to merit different treatment, there is little that addresses the reporting of Heritage Assets from an alternative, financial and non-financial perspective. The methodology used in the paper is critical analysis of relevant literature, including the promulgations of accounting standard-setting agencies and related organizations. The paper critically analyzes the doctrines and ideologies of the NPM model, challenging its assumptions that private sector financial reporting requirements based on GAAP are appropriate to account for heritage assets. Instead, the paper proposes APractical Reporting Model based on an alternative metric for the recognition and measurement of the heritage assets, centered on a framework that suggests a set of broad stakeholder-driven social, legal and cultural, rather than only economic values for reporting the Heritage Assets. The proposed practical accounting approach for heritage assets has been based on two sub-approaches: 1- Assets-Liabilities Matching Approach: Capitalize if the information on cost or value of heritage assets is available and heritage assets can be disposed, and hence they can be used to match the liabilities (Unrestricted Heritage Assets). According to this approach, heritage assets should be included in the statement of financial position and their revenues and costs should be included in the statement of financial performance. 2- Non- Assets-Liabilities Matching Approach: Not-Capitalize if the information on cost or value is not available or available but heritage assets cannot be disposed, and hence they cannot be used to match the liabilities (Restricted Heritage Assets). According to this approach, heritage assets should not be included in statement of financial position and should be treated as trust/agent assets. Therefore, each country should create a Trust/Agent Assets Statement where heritage assets stated in this statement in physical units not in financial values. So in order to account for the revenues and costs related to heritage assets, each county should create a Trust Fund (Agent Fund). This fund will include all the revenues and costs related to heritage assets in each country. The balance of the trust fund would be reported as either a liability or an asset in the balance sheet.

Keywords:
heritage assets accrual accounting and practical accounting approach

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Accounting Standard Board (ASB), (2006), “Heritage assets can accounting do better”? Discussion paper, Accounting Standards Board, London, pp.89, january.
[2]	Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1990), “Financial reporting by local government”, Australian Accounting Standard AAS 27, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
[3]	Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1992), “Definition, recognition of the elements of financial statements”, Statement of Accounting Concepts SAC 4, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
[4]	Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1993), “Financial reporting by government departments”, Australian Accounting Standard AAS 29, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
[5]	Australian Accounting Research Foundation (AARF) (1996), “Financial reporting by government departments”, Australian Accounting Standard AAS 31, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne.
[6]	Ball, I., (1994) Initiatives in public sector management and financial management: the New Zealand experience, published in Arthur Andersen, Financieel beheer,verslaggeving en prestatiemeting bij de Rijksoverheid, Symposium verslag 2 November 1994.
[7]	Ball, A. and Grubnic, S. (2008). “Sustainability Accounting and Accountability in the Public Sector‟, Unerman, J., Bebbington, J. and O‟Dwyer, B., Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, Routledge, Abingdon, UK: 243-265.
[8]	Barton, A. (1999a), “Public and Private Sector Accounting – the Non-identical twins”. Australian Accounting Review, 9 (2), 22-31.
[9]	Barker, P., (2006), “Heritage Assets: can accounting do better?” Accounting Irland, August 2006, Vol.38 No.4, pp, 48-50.
[10]	Barton, A.D. (2000), “Accounting for public heritage facilities – assets or liabilities of the government?”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 219-35.
[11]	Barton, A.D. (2005), “The conceptual arguments concerning accounting for public heritage assets: a note”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3, 2005, pp. 434-440.
[12]	Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1995), “The financial value of cultural, heritage and scientific collections: an accounting fiction”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol.5 No. 1, pp. 31-47.
[13]	Carnegie, G. and West, B. (2005). Making accounting accountable in the public sector. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 16, 905-928.
[14]	Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1996), “Enabling accountability in museums”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 84-99.
[15]	Carnegie, G.D. and Wolnizer, P.W. (1999), “Unravelling the rhetoric about the financial reporting of public collections as assets”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 16-21.
[16]	Christians, J. (2004), “Capital assets in governmental accounting reforms: Comparing Flemish technical issues with international standards”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 743-770.
[17]	Cooper, S. and Owen, D. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 649-667.
[18]	Correia, Z., (2005), “Towards a stakeholder model for the co-production of the publicsector information system”, IR-Information Research Vol. 10 No. 3, April 2005
[19]	Egyptian Law No, 117 (1983) as amended by Law No. 3 of 2010, “Promulgating the Antiquities, Protection Law, Published in the official Gazette on Februarry 14, 2010.
[20]	FASAB (2005), “Heritage assets and Stewardshio land”, Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 29, Federal Accounting Stabdards Advisory Board, Washington, DC.
[21]	Haque, M. Shamsul (2002). “Structures of New Public Management in Malaysia and Singapore: Alternative Views.” Journal of Comparative Asian Development 1(1): 71-86.
[22]	Hone, P. (1997), “The financial value of cultural, heritage and scientific collections: a publicmanagement necessity”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 38-43.
[23]	Hood, C. (1991),“A Public Management for Ail Seasons?”, Public Administration (1991) pp. 3-19.
[24]	Hood, C. (1995), “The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980’s: variations on a theme”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2/3, pp. 93-109.
[25]	Hooper, K.C. and Kearins, K.N. (2005), “Knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing: Accounting for heritage assets”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 62 (4), 181-184.
[26]	IFAC-IPSASB, (2006), “Accounting for heritage assets under the accrual accounting basis of accounting”, Consultation paper, February, 2006.
[27]	International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) (1989), “Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements.
[28]	IPSAS 16: Investment Property; December 2001.
[29]	IPSAS 17: Property, Plant and Equipment, December 2001.
[30]	Keany, R. C. and Hays, S.W (1998), “Reinventing government, the New Public Management and civil services systems in international perspective: The danger of throwing the baby out with the bathwater” Review of Public Personnel Administration 18 (4), pp. 38-54.
[31]	Keeling, D. (1972), “Management in Government”, London, Allen and Unwin.
[32]	Kelly, R.M (1998), “An inclusive democratic policy, representative bureaucracies, and the New Public Management” Public Adminstration Review 58 (3), pp. 201-208.
[33]	Kickert, W. (1997), “Public Management in the United States and Europe” Public Management and Administraive Reform in WESTEREN Europe (ed. Walter J. M. Kickert) 15-39, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
[34]	Mautz, R.K. (1988), “Editorial: monuments, mistakes and opportunities”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 123-8.
[35]	Micallef, F. and Peirson, G. (1997), “Financial reproting of cultural, heritage, scientific and community collections”, Australian Accounting Review, 7 (13), 31-7.
[36]	New Zealand Society of Accountants (NZSA) (1993), “Infrastructural and heritage assets”, Accountants Journal, Vol. 72 No. 1, p. 38.
[37]	New Zealand Treasury (2003), Valuation Guidance for Heritage Assets, available at: www.treasury.govt.nz/valuation/cultural/default.asp (accessed 2 February 2003).
[38]	Ouda, H. (2005) Transition to Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector of Developed and Developing Countries: Problems and Requirements, With special focus on the Netherlands and Egypt, p.405, Universal Press, Veenendaal, the Netherlands.
[39]	Pallot, J. (1990), “The nature of public sector assets: a response to Mautz”, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 79-85.
[40]	Pallot, J. (1992), “Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 38-59.
[41]	Rowles, T. (1991), “Infrastructure and heritage asset accounting”, Australian Accountant, 61(6), 69-74.
[42]	Rowles, T. (1992), “Financial reporting on infrastructure and heritage assets by public sector entities”, AARf Discussion paper 17, Australian accounting research foundation, Melbourne.
[43]	Rutherford, B. (1992), “Developing a conceptual framework for central government financial reporting, intermediate users and direct control”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 265-280.
[44]	Scott, G. (1996), “Government Reform in New Zealand,” International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, October 1996.
[45]	Stanford, J. (2005), “Accounting for heritage assets: Devvising a variable way forward”, paper presented at10th CIGAR (Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research conference) – May 26-27 th-2005 – Poitiers University, Poiyiers –France.
[46]	Stanton, P.J. and Stanton, P.A. (1997), “Governmental accounting for heritage assets: economic, social implications”, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 988-1006.
[47]	Strőm, S. (1997), “Accounting for assets in public sector – Ifs and Hows, unpublished paper, Stockholm, Sweden, April 1997.
[48]	Sun, N., Salama, A., Hussainey, K., Habbash, M. (2010), Corporate environmental disclosure, corporate governance and earning management. In: Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 25, No 7, pp. 679-700
[49]	Thompson, G.D. (1998), “Cultural capital and accounting”, Accounting and Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 12, No. 4, 394-492.
[50]	UK- Financial Reporting Standard FRS – 30 (2009) -Heritage Assets, Accounting Standard Board, 2009.
[51]	Wen, J., (2007), “Stakeholder Participation Approach in Urban Cultural Heritage Management and Conservation” Unpublished Master Thesis, Cottbus, Germany.
[52]	Wild, S. (2013), “Accounting for Heritage, Cultural and community Assets- An Alternative Metrics from a New Zealand Maori education Institution”, Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal (AABFJ). 7(1), 2013, 3-22.