Rubinstein and the M&M Capital Structure-Dividend Policy Theorems

Huseyin Yilmaz^1,

¹Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University-11230 Bilecik, Turkey

Cite this paper:
Huseyin Yilmaz. Rubinstein and the M&M Capital Structure-Dividend Policy Theorems. Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2021; 9(1):41-47. doi: 10.12691/jfa-9-1-4

Abstract

Rubinstein criticizes both the Modigliani & Miller capital structure theorem and dividend policy theorem explained in M&M [6] and M&M [4]. He criticizes the M&M theorems in six points. They are similarity with some former opinions, firm value and stock value confusion, additional assumptions requirement opinion, general rejection of the capital structure irrelevancy, importance of separation opinion between dividend and retained earnings, and conflict between the M&M [6] and M&M [4] articles about dividend irrelevancy opinion. They do not accept the similarity assertion. After my study on Fisher [2], Williams [9], and Morton’s opinions in Rubinstein [8], I believe that, it could be thought that Rubinstein is right. Rubinstein also seems right about the conflict between the M&M [6] and M&M [4] articles. The other assertions of Rubinstein could be seen as a brain training. The M&M accept in advance that the M&M theorem is an innovation and a new opinion.

Keywords:
Modigliani & Miller theorem M & M critics of Rubinstein fisher’s separation theorem williams’ law of the conservation of investment value replies by the M & M to the critiques

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Durand, D., Costs of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and Problems of Measurement’, Conference on Research in Business Finance, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 1952, pp.215-247.
[2]	Fisher, I., The Theory of Interest, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1930.
[3]	Miller, M.H., The Modigliani-Miller Propositions After Thirty Years, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1988, pp. 99-120.
[4]	Miller, M.H, and Modigliani, F., Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares, The Journal of Business, Vol.34, No.4, 1961, pp. 411-433.
[5]	Modigliani, F., MM - Past, Present, Future, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 2, Number 4, 1988, pp. 149-158.
[6]	Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H., The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment’, American Economic Review, Vol.48, No. 3, 1958, pp. 261–297
[7]	Rubinstein, M., Markowitz’s “Portfolio Selection”: A Fifty-Year Retrospective, The Journal of Finance, Vol.57, No.3, 2002, pp. 1041-1045.
[8]	Rubinstein, M., The History of the Theory of Investment My Annotated Bibliography, John Wiley & Sons, New jersey, 2006.
[9]	Williams, J.B., The Theory of Investment Value, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherland, 1938.
[10]	Yilmaz, H., The Modigliani &Miller Capital Structure Theorem After 62 Years, Journal of Business and Social Science ReviewVol. 1; No.11, 2020, pp. 36-56.
[11]	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_prices.
[12]	https://www.dictionary.com/browse/alpha-and-omega.