Journal of Finance and Accounting
ISSN (Print): 2333-8849 ISSN (Online): 2333-8857 Website: Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2013, 1(1), 27-38
DOI: 10.12691/jfa-1-1-3
Open AccessArticle

Evaluating Know-how for Transfer Price Benchmarking

Roberto Moro Visconti1,

1Department of Business Administration, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy

Pub. Date: March 15, 2013

Cite this paper:
Roberto Moro Visconti. Evaluating Know-how for Transfer Price Benchmarking. Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2013; 1(1):27-38. doi: 10.12691/jfa-1-1-3


Companies’ added value, even due to the expansion of the knowledge economy, is increasingly immaterial, and so is their taxable base: hence the importance of know-how, in spite of its ambiguous nature, to be tackled with an interdisciplinary accounting, financial and fiscal approach. Due to their immaterial nature, intangibles such as know-how are frequently negotiated within multinational groups, so becoming sensible to transfer pricing issues, which also depend on complex international accounting standards, with manifold corporate governance implications. OECD guidelines address the intricate problem trying to adapt standard transfer pricing methods to specific circumstances, but uncontrolled comparisons remain an uphill task, even if international accounting principles and market best practices may provide some useful hints for appraisal. To the extent that intangibles are unique, they cannot paradoxically be universal, so challenging arm’s length comparisons. Fair value market valuations, based also on critical accounting, consequently represent an uneasy and slippery benchmark. The optimal target is to disarticulate, on both economic and accounting terms, the value chain that rotates around know-how, attributing its belonging pieces to single taxpayers, so identifying a fair taxable base within each country, remembering that know-how is the engine behind growth ... and taxes.

know-how; IAS 38; tax accounting; arm’s length; information asymmetries; intangibles valuation

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


Figure of 1


[1]  Hall, R. “A framework linking intangible resources and capabilites to sustainable competitive advantage”, Strategic Management Journal 14: 607-618, 1993.
[2]  Yi A, Davey, H. and Eggleton, I.R.C., "Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework for voluntary IC disclosure", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4): 571-585, 2011.
[3]  Aboody, D., Lev, B. "Information Asymmetry, R&D, and Insider Gains", Journal of Finance 55(6): 2747-2766, 2000.
[4]  Zhao, X., Gong L., “Optimal Income Taxation with Information Asymmetry: The Lagrange Multiplier Approach”, School of Economics, Peking University, Working Paper No. E- 1-2011.
[5]  Bainbridge, D., Intellectual Property, Pearson Education, UK, 9th ed., 2012.
[6]  Lev B., Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting, Brookings Institution, Washington, 2001.
[7]  Chen, M.C., Cheng, S.J. and Hwang, Y., “An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2): 159-76, 2005.
[8]  Giuliani, M., and Marasca, M., “Construction and valuation of intellectual capital: a case study", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(3): 377-391, 2011.
[9]  Roslender, R. and Fincham, R. “Thinking Critically about Intellectual Capital Accounting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(4): 383-399, 2001.
[10]  Seetharaman, A., Sooria, H.H.B.Z., Saravanan, A.S. “Intellectual capital accounting and reporting in the knowledge economy”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2: 128-148, 2002.
[11]  Brauner, Y., “Value in the Eye of the Beholder: The Valuation of Intangibles for Transfer Pricing Purposes” Virginia Tax Review, 28(79), 2008.
[12]  Boulogne, F., “Transfer Pricing of Intangibles: A Comparison between the Netherlands and the United States” December 20, 2008.
[13]  Oestreicher, A., “Valuation Issues in Transfer Pricing of Intangibles: Comments on the Scoping of an OECD Project”, Intertax. 39(3): 126-131. 2011.
[14]  Moro Visconti, R., “Exclusive Patents And Trademarks And Subsequent Uneasy Transaction Comparability: Some Transfer Pricing Implications”, Intertax, 40(3): 212-219, 2012.
[15]  Hunt, D.P., “The concept of knowledge and how to measure it”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(1): 2003.
[16]  OECD, Transfer Pricing Guidelines (TPG) for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations, 2010.
[17]  Wittendorff, J., Transfer Pricing and the Arm's Length Principle in International Tax Law The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010.
[18]  Markham, M., The transfer pricing of intangibles The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2005.
[19]  Levey, M., Schnorrberger, S. and al., “The Quest of Marketing Intangibles”, Intertax, 34: 2-9, 2006.
[20]  oecd, model tax convention on income and capital. 2010.
[21]  Abell, M., 'Mixed Know-How and Patent Licensing Agreement', pp. 5-20, in Campbell, D. and Proksch, R., eds., International Business Transactions, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2009.
[22]  Gu, F., Lev, B., “Markets in Intangibles: Patent Licensing”, unpublished Working Paper, New York University 2001.
[23]  Bouche, N., “Part IX. Trade Secrets/Confidential Information” pp. 291-296, in Blanpain, R., Colucci, M., Vanhees, H. eds., International Encyclopaedia for Intellectual Property, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010.
[24]  Manual on Technology Transfer Negotiation, United Nations Industrial Development Organization (A Reference for Policy-makers and Practitioners on Technology Transfer), United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria, 1996.
[25]  Teece, D.J., Technological Know-How, Organizational Capabilities, and Strategic Management: Business Strategy and Enterprise Development in Competitive Environments, Singapore, World Scientific Publishing, 2008.
[26]  Roberts, J., “From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies” in Knowledge Transfer, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management; 2000.
[27]  Boldrin, M. and Levine, D.K., Against intellectual monopoly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[28]  Lee, D., Van den Stein, E. “Managing Know-How. HBS Technology & Operations Management”, Research Paper No. 07-039, 2006.
[29]  Speser, P.L., The Art and Science of Technology Transfer: Moving Technology Out of the Lab and Into Markets, New Jersey: Wiley, 2006.
[30]  Coase, R., “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, 386-405, 1937.
[31]  Pitelis, C., Sugden, R., The Nature of the Transnational Firm, London: Routledge, 2000.
[32]  Teece, D.J., “Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets”, California Management Review, 3, 1998.
[33]  Mouritsen, J., Bukh, P. N., Marr, B., “Reporting on intellectual capital: why, what and how?”, Measuring Business Excellence, 8(1): 46-54, 2004.
[34]  Cohen, J.A., Intangible Assets. Valuation and Economic Benefit, New Jersey: Wiley, 2005.
[35]  Hand, J., Lev B. and al., Intangible Assets: Values, Measures, and Risks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[36]  Reilly, R.F., Schweihs, R.P., Valuing Intangible Assets, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
[37]  Razgaitis, R., Valuation and Dealmaking of Technology-Based Intellectual Property: Principles, Methods and Tools, New Jersey: Wiley, 2009.
[38]  Tobin, J., “A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory”, Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 1-15, 1969.
[39]  AICPA, The International Glossary of Business Valuation Standards.
[40]  Pratt, S.P., Business valuation body of knowledge: exam review and professional reference ,New Jersey: Wiley, p. 75, 2003.
[41]  Silberztein, C., “Transfer pricing aspects of intangibles: the OECD project”, Transfer Pricing International Journal, 8: 4, 2011.
[42]  International Valuation Standards Council, IVS 210 Intangible Assets, London, 2011.
[43]  Seleim, A.A.S., Khalil, O. E.M., "Understanding the knowledge management-intellectual capital relationship: a two-way analysis", Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4):586-614, 2011