Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
ISSN (Print): 2374-1996 ISSN (Online): 2374-2003 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jcrt Editor-in-chief: Jean Rommelaere
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment. 2014, 2(1), 6-9
DOI: 10.12691/jcrt-2-1-2
Open AccessArticle

Absence of CHEK2 1100delC, R145W and I157T Mutations in Breast Cancer in a Moroccan Population

Amal ElAmrani1, 2, Khalid Moumad1, Mohammed Attaleb3, Mustapha Benhassou4, Asta Försti5, 6, Moulay Mustapha Ennaji2, Mohammed El Mzibri3 and Meriem Khyatti1,

1Oncovirology Laboratory, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco

2Laboratory of Virology, Microbiology and Quality/EBQ, Faculty of Sciences & Technics University Hassan II Mohammedia-Casablanca, Mohammedia, Morocco

3Unité de Biologie et Recherche Médicale, Centre National de l'Energie, des Sciences et des Techniques Nucléaires, (CNESTEN), Rabat, Morocco

4Obstetrics Service "A" Maternité Lalla Meryem, CHU Ibn Rochd Casablanca, Morocco

5Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

6Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Pub. Date: January 03, 2014

Cite this paper:
Amal ElAmrani, Khalid Moumad, Mohammed Attaleb, Mustapha Benhassou, Asta Försti, Moulay Mustapha Ennaji, Mohammed El Mzibri and Meriem Khyatti. Absence of CHEK2 1100delC, R145W and I157T Mutations in Breast Cancer in a Moroccan Population. Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment. 2014; 2(1):6-9. doi: 10.12691/jcrt-2-1-2

Abstract

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer a high risk of breast cancer (BC), although they account for only a small fraction of BC susceptibility. Rare mutations in genes conferring moderate risk may contribute to BC risk. Previous studies have shown that mutations in the CHEK2 gene, which encodes for an upstream regulator of BRCA1, may cause a moderately increased BC risk. In the current study we investigated the status of three founder mutations in the CHEK2 gene (c.1100delC, R145W and I157T) using direct sequencing in 50 BC and 50 control samples. No mutations were detected. This result is in line with the postulated existence of a c.1100delC frequency gradient from the North to the South in Europe with higher frequencies in the Northern countries.

Keywords:
breast cancer CHEK2 mutations

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2011; 61: 69-90.
 
[2]  Claus EB, Schildkraut JM, Thompson WD, Risch NJ. The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 1996; 77: 2318-24.
 
[3]  Narod SA, Foulkes WD. BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond. Nature reviews Cancer 2004; 4: 665-76.
 
[4]  Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J, Wasielewski M, de Snoo A, Oldenburg R, et al. Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2 (*) 1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Nature genetics 2002; 31: 55-9.
 
[5]  Chehab NH, Malikzay A, Appel M, Halazonetis TD. Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G (1) by stabilizing p53. Genes & development 2000; 14: 278-88.
 
[6]  Rashid MU, Muhammad N, Faisal S, Amin A, Hamann U. Constitutional CHEK2 mutations are infrequent in early-onset and familial breast/ovarian cancer patients from Pakistan. BMC cancer 2013; 13: 312.
 
[7]  Kuusisto KM, Bebel A, Vihinen M, Schleutker J, Sallinen SL. Screening for BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, BRIP1, RAD50, and CDH1 mutations in high-risk Finnish BRCA1/2-founder mutation-negative breast and/or ovarian cancer individuals. Breast cancer research: BCR 2011; 13: R20.
 
[8]  Cybulski C, Wokołorczyk D, Jakubowska A, Huzarski T, Byrski T, Gronwald J, et al. Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With a CHEK2 Mutation With and Without a Family History of Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2011; 29: 3747-52.
 
[9]  Wu X, Webster SR, Chen J. Characterization of tumor-associated Chk2 mutations. The Journal of biological chemistry 2001; 276: 2971-4.
 
[10]  Osorio A, Rodriguez-Lopez R, Diez O, de la Hoya M, Ignacio Martinez J, Vega A, et al. The breast cancer low-penetrance allele 1100delC in the CHEK2 gene is not present in Spanish familial breast cancer population. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer 2004; 108: 54-6.
 
[11]  Caligo MA, Agata S, Aceto G, Crucianelli R, Manoukian S, Peissel B, et al. The CHEK2 c.1100delC mutation plays an irrelevant role in breast cancer predisposition in Italy. Human mutation 2004; 24: 100-1.
 
[12]  Thirthagiri E, Cheong L, Yip C, Teo S-H. CHEK2* 1100delC does not contribute to risk to breast cancer among Malay, Chinese and Indians in Malaysia. Familial Cancer 2009; 8: 355-8.
 
[13]  Weischer M, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG. In Reply. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008; 26: 2419-20.
 
[14]  Iniesta MD, Gorin MA, Chien L-C, Thomas SM, Milliron KJ, Douglas JA, et al. Absence of CHEK2* 1100delC mutation in families with hereditary breast cancer in North America. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics 2010; 202: 136-40.
 
[15]  González-Hormazábal P, Castro V, Blanco R, Gómez F, Peralta O, Waugh E, et al. Absence of CHEK2 1100delC mutation in familial breast cancer cases from a South American population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 110: 543-5.
 
[16]  Bogdanova N, Enssen-Dubrowinskaja N, Feshchenko S, Lazjuk GI, Rogov YI, Dammann O, et al. Association of two mutations in the CHEK2 gene with breast cancer. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer 2005; 116: 263-6.
 
[17]  Kilpivaara O, Alhopuro P, Vahteristo P, Aaltonen LA, Nevanlinna H. CHEK2 I157T associates with familial and sporadic colorectal cancer. Journal of medical genetics 2006; 43: e34.
 
[18]  Nevanlinna H, Bartek J. The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility. Oncogene 2006; 25: 5912-9.
 
[19]  Consortium CBCC-C: CHEK2* 1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. American journal of human genetics 2004; 74(6): 1175-1182.
 
[20]  Friedrichsen DM, Malone KE, Doody DR, Daling JR, Ostrander EA: Frequency of CHEK2 mutations in a population based, case-control study of breast cancer in young women. Breast cancer research: BCR 2004; 6(6): R629-635.
 
[21]  Offit K, Pierce H, Kirchhoff T, Kolachana P, Rapaport B, Gregersen P, Johnson S, Yossepowitch O, Huang H, Satagopan J et al: Frequency of CHEK2* 1100delC in New York breast cancer cases and controls. BMC medical genetics 2003; 4:1.
 
[22]  Wagenius M, Borg A, Johansson L, Giwercman A, Bratt O: CHEK2* 1100delC is not an important high-risk gene in families with hereditary prostate cancer in southern Sweden. Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology 2006; 40(1): 23-25.
 
[23]  Einarsdottir K, Humphreys K, Bonnard C, Palmgren J, Iles MM, Sjolander A, Li Y, Chia KS, Liu ET, Hall P et al: Linkage disequilibrium mapping of CHEK2: common variation and breast cancer risk. PLoS medicine 2006; 3(6): e168.
 
[24]  Shaag A, Walsh T, Renbaum P, Kirchhoff T, Nafa K, Shiovitz S, Mandell JB, Welcsh P, Lee MK, Ellis N et al: Functional and genomic approaches reveal an ancient CHEK2 allele associated with breast cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Human molecular genetics 2005; 14(4): 555-563.
 
[25]  Kleibl Z, Novotny J, Bezdickova D, Malik R, Kleiblova P, Foretova L, Petruzelka L, Ilencikova D, Cinek P, Pohlreich P: The CHEK2 c.1100delC germline mutation rarely contributes to breast cancer development in the Czech Republic. Breast cancer research and treatment 2005; 90(2): 165-167.
 
[26]  Bernstein JL, Teraoka SN, John EM, Andrulis IL, Knight JA, Lapinski R, Olson ER, Wolitzer AL, Seminara D, Whittemore AS et al: The CHEK2* 1100delC allelic variant and risk of breast cancer: screening results from the Breast Cancer Family Registry. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2006; 15(2): 348-352.