Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport
ISSN (Print): 2376-1326 ISSN (Online): 2376-1334 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/jbe Editor-in-chief: Pr. Abdelfatteh Bouri
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport. 2015, 3(2), 65-70
DOI: 10.12691/jbe-3-2-1
Open AccessArticle

Infrastructure Financing and Management: The Impact of Concession on the Operations and Performance of Nigerian Seaports

Victor Omoke1, , Ikechukwu A. Diugwu2, Obioma R. Nwaogbe1, Callistus C. Ibe3 and David A. Ekpe3

1Department of Transport Management Technology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

2Department of Project Management Technology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Nigeria

3Department of Transport Management Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria

Pub. Date: April 24, 2015

Cite this paper:
Victor Omoke, Ikechukwu A. Diugwu, Obioma R. Nwaogbe, Callistus C. Ibe and David A. Ekpe. Infrastructure Financing and Management: The Impact of Concession on the Operations and Performance of Nigerian Seaports. Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport. 2015; 3(2):65-70. doi: 10.12691/jbe-3-2-1

Abstract

This paper study examined the effect of privatization on the performance of Nigerian seaports, using pre- and post-privatization data. A Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon (MWW) test was applied to data (secondary) on two major indices of port operation (average berth occupancy and average turn-around time). The result of the analysis showed that on average, the berth occupancy and turn-around time improved from 51.35% to 72.47% and 8.18 days to 4.83 days respectively. It was also found that at a 0.05 level of significance, the concession of Nigerian ports has significantly improved average berth occupancy and average turnaround time of the vessels calling at Nigerian ports. The study emphasises the need to provide enabling environment through the formulation and implementation of effective policies as a way of ensuring optimal performance of the concession model.

Keywords:
port concession port operations average berth occupancy average turn-round time

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Alfred, T.M. Sea Lines under Strain. 1999 [cited 2014 20 February]; Available from: http://www.mima.gov.my/mima/wp-content/uploads/sealinesunderstrain.pdf.
 
[2]  Ndikom, O., The essentials of the Port Reforms: The Nigerian Experience. 2004, Lagos: Bumico Publishers.
 
[3]  Bousquet, F. and A. Fayard. Road Infrastructure concession practice in Europe: a report based on document on analysis of highway concessions in Europe. 2001 [cited 2015 15 January]; Available from: www.rru.worldbank.org/documents/toolkits/highways/pdf/25.pdf.
 
[4]  Federal Government of Nigeria, Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commssion Act, 2005. 2005: Nigeria.
 
[5]  Oghojafor, B.E., O. Kuye, and G. Alaneme, Concession as a Strategic Tool for Ports Efficiency: An Assessment of the Nigerian Ports. American Journal of Business and Management, 2012. 1(4): p. 214-222.
 
[6]  Awam, I., Analysis of the Impact of Concession on Port Operations: a Focus on Nigerian Seaports, in Transport Management Technology. 2014, Federal University of Technology, Owerri. : Owerri.
 
[7]  Tongzon, J. and W. Heng, Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2005. 39(5): p. 405-424.
 
[8]  Tongzon, J.L., Determinants of port performance and efficiency. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1995. 29(3): p. 245-252.
 
[9]  Cullinane, K., P. Ji, and T.-f. Wang, The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry. Journal of Economics and Business, 2005. 57(5): p. 433-462.
 
[10]  Cullinane, K., D.-W. Song, and R. Gray, A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2002. 36(8): p. 743-762.
 
[11]  Iheme, E., The Incubus: The story of Public Enterprise in Nigeria. 1997, Lagos: Helmsman Associates.
 
[12]  Starr, P., The Meaning of Privatization. Yale Law and Policy Review, 1988. 6( ): p. 6-41.
 
[13]  Ircha, M.C., North American port reform: The Canadian and American experience. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2001. 3(2): p. 198-220.
 
[14]  Notteboom, T.E., Concession Agreements as Port Governance Tools. Research in Transportation Economics, 2007. 17: p. 437-455.
 
[15]  Ndikom, O., The Kernel Concept of Shipping Operations, Policies and Strategies: The Industry Overview. 2006, Lagos: Bumico Publishers.
 
[16]  Anagor, U., The gains and challenges of port concession in Nigeria, in BusinessDay. 2014: Lagos, Nigeria.
 
[17]  Mundhe, R., Infrastructure concession contract: an introduction, in Viewpoint 2008, CUTS Centre for Competition, Investment & Economic Regulation: Jaipur, India. p. 1-3.
 
[18]  Kruk, C.B., Port Reform and Concessions in Nigeria. 2008.
 
[19]  Razak, R., Understanding port reforms: The Nigerian Situation. 2005, Lagos: Marine Business International.
 
[20]  Abdullahi, H., Public Private Partnership And Port Efficiency: The Nigerian Experience, in 12th Intermodal Africa Conference & Exhibition. 2014: Lagos, Nigeria.
 
[21]  Dancey, C.P. and J. Reidy, Statistics without maths or psychology: using SPSS for windows. 2 ed. 2002, Harlow: Prentice Hall.
 
[22]  Pallant, J., SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. 2001, Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.