Development of Statewide Freight Flows Assignment Using the Freight Analysis Framework (Faf³)

Arturo Bujanda^1, , Juan Villa² and Jon Williams³

¹Associate Research Specialist Texas Transportation Institute

²Program Manager Texas Transportation Institute

³Research Associate Texas Transportation Institute

Cite this paper:
Arturo Bujanda, Juan Villa and Jon Williams. Development of Statewide Freight Flows Assignment Using the Freight Analysis Framework (Faf³). Journal of Behavioural Economics, Finance, Entrepreneurship, Accounting and Transport. 2014; 2(2):47-57. doi: 10.12691/jbe-2-2-3

Abstract

This research presents a methodology to estimate freight flows along corridors serving international trade. A methodology to disaggregate regional flows from the Federal Highway Administration’s Freight Analysis Framework (FAF³) to the state level was developed and applied to the State of Texas. To keep international trade moving in a timely and efficient manner, it is important to have accurate information identifying and anticipating capacity shortfalls and congestion nodes. As trade levels increase, the strain on existing infrastructure serving international trade will only get worse; therefore, this information is important for improving strategic investment decisions. This research presents findings from literature reviewed about the FAF³ structure and existing methodologies to estimate freight flows at statewide and regional levels. A methodology to disaggregate national FAF³ data and then assign and estimate the tons of international freight flows through statewide roadways and railroads was developed. Texas’s international trade corridors are used as a case study to apply the methodology and estimate current and future freight demand. Results from the case study demonstrate encouraging findings about this methodology. Conclusions and recommendations to refine and improve this methodology and the FAF³ are provided.

Keywords:
Freight Analysis Framework Truck Traffic freight flows Statewide Traffic Assignment international trade texas Truck Traffic Congestion growth

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Port of Houston authority. Sustainability Report. [Online] 2009. http://www.portofhouston.com/pdf/AR09/PHA_Sustainabilty_Report_09.pdf.
[2]	Southworth, Frank, et al., et al.The Freight Analysis Framework, Version 3: Overview of the FAF3 National Freight Flow Tables. Washington, DC: Office of Freight Management and Operations Federal Highway Administration, 2010.
[3]	Wurfel, Erin, et al., et al.Freight Analysis Framework for Major Metropolitan Areas in Kansas. Lawerence, Kansas: Kansas Department of Transportation and The University of Kansas, 2009. Final Report. K-TRAN: KU-08-4.
[4]	Harris, Gregory and Anderson, Michael.Modeling Truck Traffic Volume Growth Congestion. Tuscaloosa, AL: University Transportation Center for Alabama, The University of Alabama. 07304.
[5]	Preissig, David T and Souleyrette, Reginald R.Multimodal Statewide Freight Transportation Modeling Process. Schaumburg, IL: TranSystems Corporation and Center for Transportation Research and Education Iowa State University.
[6]	Methodology for Estimating Freight Volume Shift in an International Intermodal Corridor. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios and Moraitis, Panayota. 2008, Washington, D.C.: In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. ISSN: 0361-1981.
[7]	NCHRP REPORT 606: Forecasting Statewide Freight Toolkit. Cohen, Harry, Horowitz, Alan and Pendyala, Ram. Washington, D.C.: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2008. ISBN: 978-0-309-09924-0.
[8]	Cambridge Systematics and Geostats.NCFRP Report 8: Freight-Demand Modeling to Support Public-Sector Decision Making. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 2010. ISBN 978-0-309-15513-7.
[9]	Quiroga, Cesar, et al., et al.NCFRP Report 9: Guidance for Developing a Freight Transportation Data Architecture. Washingotn, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, 2011. ISBN 978-0-309-15523-6.
[10]	Methodology to Obtain a Mexico–U.S. Multiproduct Origin–Destination Matrix. Mendoza, Alberto, Perez, Emilio Abarca and Centeno, and Agustín G. Washington, D.C.: In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, Vol. 2049, pp. 153-157.
[11]	Multiproduct Network Analysis of Freight Land Transport between Mexico and the United States. Mendoza, Alberto, Gil, Claudia Z. and Trejo, Juan M. Washington, D.C.: In Transportation Research Record, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1653.
[12]	Using Brokers to Determine North American Free Trade Agreement Truck Origins and Destinations at Texas–Mexico Border. Harrison, Robert. Washington, D.C.: In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1719, pp. 136-139.
[13]	U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration. Freight Analysis Framework 3 Network Database and Flow Assignment: 2007 and 2040. Freight Management and Operations. [Online] June 6, 2011. [Cited: July 25, 2011.] http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/faf3/netwkdbflow/index.htm.
[14]	U.S. Department of Transportation. North American Transborder Freight Data: Query Detailed Statistics. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. [Online] [Cited: July 28, 2011.] http://www.bts.gov/programs/international/transborder/TBDR_QA.html
[15]	US Army Corps of Engineers. US Army Corps of Engineers Navigation Data Center. Waterborne Commerce Statistics. [Online] Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center. [Cited: July 28, 2011.] http://www.ndc.iwr.usace.army.mil//wcsc/wcsc.htm