Evolution of the Innovation Process Models

Mikhaylova Anna Alekseevna^1,

¹Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia

Cite this paper:
Mikhaylova Anna Alekseevna. Evolution of the Innovation Process Models. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management. 2014; 2(4):119-123. doi: 10.12691/ijefm-2-4-1

Abstract

The article provides a review of the evolution of scientific concepts on the innovation process. Two main approaches to the innovation process are presented: linear and non-linear, and their distinctive features are defined. Within each approach the main types of models of the innovation process are considered. The stages of formation and development of a linear model of the innovation process are reviewed. Analyzed the influence of various factors on the occurrence of non-linear models of the innovation process. Highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of linear and non-linear approaches to the development of models of the innovation process. The effect of trends in the localization of the innovation process in the current models of the innovation process are studied. The modeling of the innovation process at the present stage is proposed to be considered as a complex, interactive, nonlinear localized learning process.

Keywords:
innovation process linear model of innovation non-linear model innovation innovation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Anthony, R.N., Day, J.S., Management controls in industrial research organizations. Harvard University, Boston. 1952.
[2]	Berkhout, A.J., Hartmann, D., van der Duin, P. Ortt, R. “Innovating the innovation process”, Int. J. Technology Management, 34 (3/4). 390-404. 2006.
[3]	Bernal, J.D., The social function of science. Reprint. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1973.
[4]	Brokel, T., Binder, M., “The Regional Dimension of Knowledge Transfers – A Behavioral Approach”, Industry and Innovation. 14 (2). 151-175. 2007.
[5]	Chesbrough, H.,Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology.Harvard Business Press. 2006.
[6]	Cooper, R.G., Stage-Gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products. Business Horizons (5/6). 1990.
[7]	Drucker, P.F., Management Revised. Harper Business. 2008.
[8]	Dyatlov, S.А., “Global innovation hypercompetition as a factor of transformation and development of economic systems”, Theoretical economy. 6. 39-54. 2012.
[9]	Florida, R., The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books, New York. 2003.
[10]	Godin, B., “The Linear Model of Innovation. The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework”, Science, Technology, & Human Values. 31 (6). 639-667. 2006.
[11]	Gomory, R., From the Ladder of Science to the Product Development Cycle. Harvard Business Review. 1989.
[12]	Graves, A., “Comparative Trends in Automotive Research and Development”, DRC Discussion Paper No. 54, Sussex University, Brighton, Sussex. 1987.
[13]	Hein, L., Andreasen, M., Integrated Product Development. IPU, Lyngby. 2000.
[14]	Huxley, J.S., Scientific research and social needs. Watts and Co, London. 1934.
[15]	Imai, K., Nonaka, I., Fakeuchi, H., “Managing the New Product Development”, in Clark, K. and Hayes, F. (Eds), The Uneasy Alliance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. 1985.
[16]	Isaksen, A., “Building Regional Innovation Systems: Is Endogenous Indus trial Development Possible in the Global Economy?”, Canadian Journal of Regional Science. 24(1). 101-120. 2011.
[17]	Janszen, F., The Age of Innovation. Financial Times Prentice Hall. 2000.
[18]	Kline, S., Rosenberg, N. “An Overview of innovation”, in Landau R, Rosenberg N, editors. The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. 275-306. 1986.
[19]	Kodama, F., Technology Fusion and the New R&D. [Online]. Available: http://hbr.org/1992/07/technology-fusion-and-the-new-rd/ar/1
[20]	Kodama, F., Emerging patterns of innovation: source of Japan technological edge. Harvard Business School Press, 1995.
[21]	Lall, S., Competitiveness, Technology and Skills. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. 2001.
[22]	Mahdjoubi, D., The linear model of technological innovation: background and taxonomy. 1997. [Online]. Available: https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~darius/04-Linear%20Model.pdf.
[23]	Murray, A., Hanlon, P., An Investigation into the Stickiness of Tacit Knowledge Transfer. in 13th. Annual conference of the Irish Academy of Management, Cork institute of technology, 1-3 September, 2010.
[24]	Rothwell, R., “Towards the fifth-generation innovation process”, International Marketing Review. 11(7). 7-31. 1994.
[25]	Schumpeter, J., Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill, New York. 1939.
[26]	Szulanski, G., “Exploring internal Stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm”, Strategic Management Journal.17, 27-43. 1996.
[27]	Tidd. J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K., Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley. 2005.
[28]	Van De Ven, A.H., Polley, D.E., Garud, R., Venkataraman, S., The Innovation Journey. Administrative Science Quarterly. Oxford University Press, 1999.
[29]	Wheelwright, S.C., Clark K.B., Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency and quality. The Free Press, NY. 1992.
[30]	Ziman, H., “A Neural Model of Innovation”, Science and Public Policy, 18 (1). 65-75. 1991.
[31]	Žižlavsky, O., “Past, Present and Future of the Innovation Process”, International Journal of Engineering Business Management. 5(47). 2013. [Online]. Available: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/45701.pdf