Fracture Resistance of Laminate Veneers Made with Different Cutting and Preparation Techniques

Mustafa Duzyol^1, , Esra Duzyol² and Nilgun Seven³

¹Gaziantep University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey

²Ataturk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Erzurum, Turkey

³Ataturk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Erzurum, Turkey

Cite this paper:
Mustafa Duzyol, Esra Duzyol and Nilgun Seven. Fracture Resistance of Laminate Veneers Made with Different Cutting and Preparation Techniques. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2016; 4(3):42-48. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-4-3-3

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of most used three preparation techniques applied laminate veneers made with three different restoration methods. Materials and Methods: 195 same sized maxillary central incisor teeth were grouped 10 different groups randomly. (testing groups n=20, control group n=15) Three different preparation techniques used for teeth preparation which were feather-edge, insical overlap and window. Laminate veneers were produced with three different methods that direct, indirect technique, and CAD/CAM milling. Control group was chosen from untreated teeth. Universal testing machinewas used for fracture resistance test. Data were analyzed with two-ways ANOVA and Tukey LSD. Results: According to results, statistically differences were found between all groups.(p<0,05) Combination of insical overlap preparation and direct technique has higher fracture resistance values than other groups.(563,9 N). Conclusions: Preparation and restoration techniques are important for fracture resistance of laminate veneers.

Keywords:
CAD/CAM laminate veneer fracture resistance resin composite resin nano ceramics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Nakamura T, Imanishi A, Kashima H, Ohyama T, Ishigaki S. Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:401-405.
[2]	Crispin BJ. Indirect composite restorations: alternative or replacement for ceramic? Compendium of continuing education in dentistry 2002;23:611-614, 616, 618 passim; quiz 624.
[3]	Soares CJ, Santana FR, Fonseca RB, Martins LR, Neto FH. In vitro analysis of the radiodensity of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems and its influence on the detection of cement overhangs. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:331-336.
[4]	Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. Journal of the American Dental Association 2000;131:375-383.
[5]	Samet N, Kwon KR, Good P, Weber HP. Voids and interlayer gaps in Class 1 posterior composite restorations: a comparison between a microlayer and a 2-layer technique. Quintessence international 2006;37:803-809.
[6]	Sturdevant CM, Barton RE, Sockwell CL, Strickland WD. The Art and science of operative dentistry. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1985.
[7]	Robbins JW. Color characterization of porcelain veneers. Quintessence international 1991;22:853-856.
[8]	Zeng K, Oden A, Rowcliffe D. Flexure tests on dental ceramics. The International journal of prosthodontics 1996;9:434-439.
[9]	Plengsombut K, Brewer JD, Monaco EA, Jr., Davis EL. Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2009;101:166-173.
[10]	Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, Pan YH. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro. J Dent 2012;40:202-209.
[11]	McLaughlin G, Morrison JE. Porcelain fused to tooth--the state of the art. Restorative dentistry 1988;4:90-94.
[12]	Seymour KG, Samarawickrama DYD, Zou L. Tooth preparation for porcelain veneers--which technique do I use? British Dental Journal 2002;192:1p.
[13]	Shetty A, Kaiwar A, Shubhashini N, Ashwini P, Naveen D, Adarsha M, et al. Survival rates of porcelain laminate restoration based on different incisal preparation designs: An analysis. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD 2011;14:10-15.
[14]	Berksun S, Kedici PS, Saglam S. Repair of fractured porcelain restorations with composite bonded porcelain laminate contours. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1993;69:457-458.
[15]	Meijering AC, Creugers NH, Roeters FJ, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 1998;26:563-568.
[16]	Troedson M, Derand T. Effect of margin design, cement polymerization, and angle of loading on stress in porcelain veneers. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 1999;82:518-524.
[17]	Luhrs AK, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin. Dent Mater 2014;30:281-291.
[18]	Mahmood DJ, Linderoth EH, Vult Von Steyern P. The influence of support properties and complexity on fracture strength and fracture mode of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:229-237.
[19]	Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH, Phillips K, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:171-180.
[20]	Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS. Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing core buildup composite bonded to dentin with 9 dentin adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:620-623.
[21]	Turkaslan S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Bagis B, Shinya A, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of intermediate fiber layer on the fracture load and failure mode of maxillary incisors restored with laminate veneers. Dent Mater J 2008;27:61-68.
[22]	Hagberg C. Assessment of bite force: a review. Journal of craniomandibular disorders : facial & oral pain 1987;1:162-169.
[23]	Calamia JR. Materials and technique for etched porcelain facial veneers. The Alpha omegan 1988;81:48-51.
[24]	De Andrade OS, Hirata R, Celestrino M, Seto M, Siqueira S, Jr., Nahas R. Ultimate ceramic veneer: a laboratory-guided preparation technique for minimally invasive laminate veneers. J Calif Dent Assoc 2012;40:489-494.
[25]	Pascotto RC, Benetti AR. The clinical microscope and direct composite veneer. Oper Dent 2010;35:246-249.