Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Mandibular Implant Surveyed Crowns Retained Removable Partial Denture Versus Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture

Nouf Al Humayyani; Fahad K Alwthinani; Mohamed Y. Abdelfattah

International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2021, 9(2), 49-60
DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-9-2-6

Open AccessArticle

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Mandibular Implant Surveyed Crowns Retained Removable Partial Denture Versus Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture

Nouf Al Humayyani¹, Fahad K Alwthinani¹ and Mohamed Y. Abdelfattah^{2, 3,}

¹Assistant Professor of Fixed Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, KSA

²Assistant professor of prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

³Assistant professor of Removable Prosthodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, KSA

Pub. Date: November 28, 2021

View Full Text Full Text PDF (810 KB) Full Text ePUB(3713 KB)

Cite this paper:
Nouf Al Humayyani, Fahad K Alwthinani and Mohamed Y. Abdelfattah. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Mandibular Implant Surveyed Crowns Retained Removable Partial Denture Versus Mandibular Implant Retained Overdenture. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2021; 9(2):49-60. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-9-2-6

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the implant surveyed crowns performance as abutments retaining removable partial denture (IC-RPDs) in comparison with implant overdentures (IODs). Materials and Methods: 12 totally edentulous male individuals allocated in 2 categories; Group I (n=6): planned to receive (IC-RPDs) and Group II (n=6): received (IODs). For both groups, routine surgical and prosthodontics steps for implant placement were followed. Clinical evaluations included implant survival rates(SR), percussion(P), probing depth(PD), plaque index (PI) in addition to the VAS satisfaction of function and esthetics of the two treatment modalities. Radiographic evaluations expressed differences in marginal bone heights (MBH). Evaluations are performed at insertion time of final prostheses, and after 3,6,9,and 12 months. Results were analyzed using Nonparametric ANOVA . Two-way ANOVA was used to compare Group I &II. Results: No statistically significant differences were founded between IC-RPDs and IODs regarding survival rates (SR) in spite that the IC-RPD group achieved 100% , and IODs group showed 83.3%. high percussion sounds were perceived during all follow-up intervals reflecting successful osseointegration. Similarly, non-significant differences were observed at all follow-up intervals between the two groups regarding Probing Depth, Plaque Index, and Marginal Bone Heights. Esthetic and functional outcomes were considerably enhanced following IC-RPDs or IODs treatments. clasp loosening, and attachment dislodgement were the apparent mechanical problems with IC-RPDs and IODs groups respectively. Conclusion: Under the limitations, placing implants in the front mandibular area to serve either as abutments retaining class I Kennedy Removable Partial Denture or Implant Overdentures might represent efficient treatment modalities , particularly for anatomical or economic conditions that limit placing of more numbers of implants in more posterior locations.

Keywords:
IC-RPDs IODs Marginal Bone Loss Implant Complications

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Morandi R, Cabral LM, de Moraes M. Implant-supported maxillary denture retained by a telescopic abutment system: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar; 117(3): 331-334.

[2]	Abbasi MRA, Vinnakota DN, Sankar V, Kamatham R. Comparison of stress induced in mandible around an implant-supported overdenture with locator attachment and telescopic crowns - a finite element analysis. Med Pharm Rep. 2020 Apr; 93(2): 181-189.

[3]	Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures--a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent. 2012 Jan; 40(1): 22-34.

[4]	Amaral CF, Pinheiro MA, de Moraes M, Rodrigues Garcia RCM. Psychometric Analysis and Masticatory Efficiency of Elderly People with Single-Implant Overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec; 33(6): 1383-1389.

[5]	Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug; 17(4): 601-2. PMID: 12182304.

[6]	Yoo JS, Kwon KR, Noh K, Lee H, Paek J. Stress analysis of mandibular implant overdenture with locator and bar/clip attachment: Comparative study with differences in the denture base length. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun; 9(3): 143-151.

[7]	Mericske-Stern R, Venetz E, Fahrländer F, Bürgin W. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Nov; 84(5): 535-47.

[8]	Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Fall; 4(3): 241-7. PMID: 2700747.

[9]	Manju V, Sreelal T. Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: an in vitro comparison of ball, bar, and magnetic attachments. J Oral Implantol. 2013 Jun; 39(3): 302-7.

[10]	Turker N, Buyukkaplan US. Effects of overdenture attachment systems with different working principles on stress transmission: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Dec; 12(6): 351-360.

[11]	Cooper LF, Limmer BM, Gates WD. "Rules of 10"--guidelines for successful planning and treatment of mandibular edentulism using dental implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012 May; 33(5): 328-34; quiz 335-6. PMID: 22616215.

[12]	Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar; 15(1): 24-34.

[13]	Grossmann Y, Nissan J, Levin L. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported removable partial dentures: a review of the literature and retrospective case evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep; 67(9): 1941-6.

[14]	Cunha LD, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, Pereira JA. Evaluation of the influence of location of osseointegrated implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures. Implant Dent. 2008 Sep; 17(3): 278-87.

[15]	Kang SH, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY. Survival rate and clinical evaluation of the implants in implant assisted removable partial dentures: surveyed crown and overdenture. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020 Aug; 12(4): 239-249.

[16]	Papaspyridakos P, Bordin TB, Kim YJ, El-Rafie K, Pagni SE, Natto ZS, Teixeira ER, Chochlidakis K, Weber HP. Technical Complications and Prosthesis Survival Rates with Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 12-Year Follow-Up. J Prosthodont. 2020 Jan; 29(1): 3-11.

[17]	Sailer I, Strasding M, Valente NA, Zwahlen M, Liu S, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16: 184-198.

[18]	Kang, S.H.; Kim, S.K.; Heo, S.J.; Koak, J.Y. Survival rate and clinical evaluation of the implants in implant assisted removable partial dentures: Surveyed crown and overdenture. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2020, 12, 239–249.

[19]	Anas El-Wegoud M, Fayyad A, Kaddah A, Nabhan A. Bar versus ball attachments for implant-supported overdentures in complete edentulism: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Apr; 20(2): 243-250.

[20]	Zimmermann, J.; Sommer, M.; Grize, L.; Stubinger, S. Marginal bone loss 1 year after implantation: A systematic review for fixed and removable restorations. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2019, 11, 195–218.

[21]	Saravi, B.E.; Putz, M.; Patzelt, S.; Alkalak, A.; Uelkuemen, S.; Boeker, M. Marginal bone loss around oral implants supporting fixed versus removable prostheses: A systematic review. Int. J. Implant Dent. 2020, 6, 20.

[22]	de Freitas RF, de Carvalho Dias K, da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Barbosa GA, Ferreira MA. Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Oct; 39(10): 791-8.

[23]	Payne AG, Solomons YF. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2000 May-Jun; 13(3): 246-53. PMID: 11203640.

[24]	Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Dec; 12(6): 559-71.

[25]	Røynesdal AK, Amundrud B, Hannaes HR. A comparative clinical investigation of 2 early loaded ITI dental implants supporting an overdenture in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Mar-Apr; 16(2): 246-51. PMID: 11324212.

[26]	Mombelli A, Van Oosten MAC, Schürch E, Lang NP: The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987; 2: 145-151.

[27]	Yao, C.J.; Cao, C.; Bornstein,M.M.;Mattheos, N. Patient-reported outcome measures of edentulous patients restored with implant supported removable and fixed prostheses: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018, 29 (Suppl. 16), 241–254.

[28]	Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun; 23(3): 195-203. PMID: 20552083.

[29]	Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008 Mar; 17(1): 5-15.

[30]	Raza FB, Vaidyanathan AK, Veeravalli PT, Ravishankar S, Ali AS. Analysis of crestal bone loss around single piece ball attachment implant placed bilaterally in canine region and wear of O-ring in implant supported overdenture: Three year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun; 20(3): 403-409.

[31]	Yao CJ, Cao C, Bornstein MM, Mattheos N. Patient-reported outcome measures of edentulous patients restored with implant-supported removable and fixed prostheses: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16: 241-254.

[32]	Feine J, Abou-Ayash S, Al Mardini M, de Santana RB, Bjelke-Holtermann T, Bornstein MM, Braegger U, Cao O, Cordaro L, Eycken D, Fillion M, Gebran G, Huynh-Ba G, Joda T, Levine R, Mattheos N, Oates TW, Abd-Ul-Salam H, Santosa R, Shahdad S, Storelli S, Sykaras N, Treviño Santos A, Stephanie Webersberger U, Williams MAH, Wilson TG Jr, Wismeijer D, Wittneben JG, Yao CJ, Zubiria JPV. Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16: 270-275.

[33]	Chang, H.S.; Hsieh, Y.D.; Hsu, M.L. Long-term survival rate of implant-supported overdentures with various attachment systems:A 20-year retrospective study. J. Dent. Sci. 2015, 10, 55–60.

[34]	Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bilhan H. The effect of maximum bite force, implant number, and attachment type on marginal bone loss around implants supporting mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1: e91-7.

[35]	Ohyama T, Nakabayashi S, Yasuda H, Kase T, Namaki S. Mechanical analysis of the effects of implant position and abutment height on implant-assisted removable partial dentures. J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Jul; 64(3): 340-345.

[36]	Bae EB, Kim SJ, Choi JW, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Yun MJ, Lee SH, Huh JB. A Clinical Retrospective Study of Distal Extension Removable Partial Denture with Implant Surveyed Bridge or Stud Type Attachment. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 7140870.

[37]	Vahidi F, Pinto-Sinai G. Complications associated with implant-retained removable prostheses. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan; 59(1): 215-26. .

[38]	Marotti, J.; Gatzweiler, B.; Wolfart, M.; Sasse, M.; Kern, M.; Wolfart, S. Implant Placement under Existing Removable Dental Prostheses and the Effect on Follow-Up and Prosthetic Maintenance. J. Prosthodont. Implant Esthet. Reconstr. Dent. 2019, 28, E752–E763.

[39]	Beikler T, Flemmig TF. EAO consensus conference: economic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 11: 7-63.

[40]	Ortiz-Puigpelat, O.; Lazaro-Abdulkarim, A.; deMedrano-Rene, J.M.; Gargallo-Albiol, J.; Cabratosa-Termes, J.; Hernandez-Alfaro, F. Influence of Implant Position in Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.J. Prosthodont. Implant Esthet. Reconstr. Dent. 2019, 28, E675–E681.