International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research
ISSN (Print): 2333-1135 ISSN (Online): 2333-1259 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ijdsr Editor-in-chief: Marcos Roberto Tovani Palone
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2021, 9(1), 20-22
DOI: 10.12691/ijdsr-9-1-5
Open AccessCase Report

A Nonsurgical Approach for Removal of Overfilling Guttapercha: Case Report

Nawaf Almutairi1,

1Conservative Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia

Pub. Date: February 06, 2021

Cite this paper:
Nawaf Almutairi. A Nonsurgical Approach for Removal of Overfilling Guttapercha: Case Report. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2021; 9(1):20-22. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-9-1-5

Abstract

The consequence of the material used during obturation being overextended out of the root canal may cause a reaction of an inflammatory process with a rarefaction area in periapical tissue. The process of healing is not affected by filling materials because the periapical tissues could tolerate it well, but a greater failure frequency is identified in teeth with an overfilled. Case report: This case report depicts an overextended guttapercha material and a different nonsurgical approach to remove this material. Conclusion: This conservative approach is a secure and plausible choice to remove extruded guttapercha in the periapical area. Clinical significance: The failure of endodontic treatment could increase with overextended guttapercha materials. One of the most common approaches to remove this overextended guttapercha cone is a surgical technique. Nonetheless, this nonsurgical technique could be a better alternative treatment technique and could increase success.

Keywords:
guttapercha periapical tissues overfilling overinstumentaion

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Swartz, D.B., A.E. Skidmore, and J.A. Griffin, Jr., Twenty years of endodontic success and failure. J Endod, 1983. 9(5): p. 198-202.
 
[2]  Bergenholtz, G., et al., Influence of apical overinstrumentation and overfilling on re-treated root canals. J Endod, 1979. 5(10): p. 310-4.
 
[3]  Seltzer, S., W. Soltanoff, and J. Smith, Biologic aspects of endodontics. V. Periapical tissue reactions to root canal instrumentation beyond the apex and root canal fillings short of and beyond the apex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1973. 36(5): p. 725-37.
 
[4]  Seltzer, S., et al., Biologic aspects of endodontics part III. periapical tissue reactions to root canal instrumentation. 1968. J Endod, 2004. 30(7): p. 491-9; discussion 489-90.
 
[5]  Souza, R.A., et al., Apical limit of root canal filling and its relationship with success on endodontic treatment of a mandibular molar: 11-year follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2011. 112(1): p. e48-50.
 
[6]  Sjogren, U., et al., Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod, 1990. 16(10): p. 498-504.
 
[7]  Takahashi, C.M., et al., In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for guttapercha removal with or without a solvent. J Endod, 2009. 35(11): p. 1580-3.
 
[8]  Schirrmeister, J.F., et al., Efficacy of different rotary instruments for guttapercha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod, 2006. 32(5): p. 469-72.