Fluoride Release from Composite Resin in Different Media

Fanar Turki A.Al-Jadwaa¹, Moataz GH. Saadallah \ Al-Shaekh Ali.¹ and Amer A. Taqa^2,

¹Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

²Department of Dental Basic Science, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

Cite this paper:
Fanar Turki A.Al-Jadwaa, Moataz GH. Saadallah \ Al-Shaekh Ali. and Amer A. Taqa. Fluoride Release from Composite Resin in Different Media. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2020; 8(3):75-79. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-8-3-4

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to measure the fluoride released from composite resins stored in different beverages. Materials and Methods: Three composite resins (Te-Econom, Tetric ceram, and VOCO) were used. Twenty specimens for each composite resin were prepared according to the manufacturer instructions, and were divided into four groups (The first group were stowed in deionized water, the second group were stowed in orange juice, the third group were stowed in Pepsi Cola while the last group were stowed in coffee without sugure). The storage solutions were replaced after 7, 15 and 30 days and fluoride release (FR) at the end of each storage period was measured by "fluoride ion selective electrode". Results: One way analysis and Duncan test were used to statistically analyze the data. The amount of FR from the tested materials was significantly higher in orange juice (at day 15) than the amount of fluoride released in coffee and Pepsi Cola. The amount of fluoride released from the tested materials was significantly higher in Pepsi cola (at day 7) than the amount of fluoride released in orange and Pepsi cola. Conclusion: The ability of restorative dental materials to slowly release fluoride ions may provide a positive advantage in terms of recurrent caries inhibition.

Keywords:
storage media fluoride release composite resin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations .J American Dental Associated 1963; 66:57–64.
[2]	Hervás-García A, Martínez-Lozano MA, Cabanes-Vila J, Barjau-Escribano A, Fos-Galve P. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications .Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: 215-20.
[3]	Amer A.Taqa and Manal Abdul Jabar, The effect of time curing on the fluoride release on the composite resin,Al- Rafidain dental Journal 2008;8(2):255-258.
[4]	Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review On Fluoride Releasing Restorative Materials, Fluoride Release And Uptake Charac-teristics, Antibacterial Activity And Influence On Caries Formation. Dental Material 2007; 23:343-362.
[5]	Williams JA, Briggs E,Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The Effects of Adding Fluoride Compounds to a Fluoride-free Glass Ionomer Cement on Subsequent Fluoride and Sodium release. Biomaterials 2003; 24:1301-8.
[6]	Lesley Ross Vorster. Total and Bioavailable Fluoride Concentrations in Commercially Available Toothpastes in South Africa. M.Sc thesis, University of the Western Cape. 2015; 2 :21.
[7]	Mody GJ and Thomas JDR. Ion Selective Electrodes in Analytical Chemistry, 2nd edition. Henery Freizer. New York. 1981; 10: 369-370.
[8]	Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of storage media on the Fluoride Release and Surface Microhardness of four poly-modified Composite Resins (“compomers”). Dental Material 1999; 15: 196-201.
[9]	Bayindir YZ,Yildiz M. Surface Hardness Properties of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements and Polyacid-Modified Composite Resins. J Contemprally Dental Pract. 2004; 5(4): 042-049.
[10]	Gul Tosun, Nilgun Ozturk, Yagmur Sener, Beniz Gunduz Effect Of Light Curing Units And Storage Time on The Degree Of Conversion Of Fissure Sealants. Rev. Clinical Pesq. Odontol., Curitiba 2009; 5(.2): 111-119.
[11]	Gandolfi MG, Chersoni S, Acquaviva GL, Piana G, Prati C and Mongiorgi R. Fluoride release and absorption at different pH from glass iomomer cement. Dental Material 2006; 22: 441-449.
[12]	Martin S, Frants and James W Ross J. Use of Total Ionic Strength Adjusting Buffer Determination of Fluoride in Water Supplies. Journal Anal Chemical 1968; 7: 1169-1170.
[13]	Nicholson JW, Czarnecka B. The releasle of ions by compomers under neutral and acidic conditions. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 665-670.
[14]	Garcez, Buzalaf, Araújo. Fluoride release of six restorative materials in water and ph-cycling solutions . J appl oral science 2007;15(5):406-11
[15]	Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride releaseing restorative materials, fluoride release and uptake characteristics antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dental Material2007; 23: 343-362.
[16]	Amer A. Taqa, Abdul-K. Abdal, and Alaa I. Dawood, “The Effect of pH on Fluoride Release of Glass Ionomer Based Restorative Materials.” International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research 2016; 4(3): 52-57.
[17]	Vieira AR, de Souza IP, Modesto A. Fluoride uptake and release by composites and glass ionomers in a high caries challenge situation. American J Dental. 1999; 12: 14-8.
[18]	Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass ionomer and compomer materials 6-months data. J Dental 1998; 26(4): 355-9.
[19]	Carvalho AS, Cury JA. Fluoride release from some dental materials in different solutions. Oper Dentistry. 1999; 24(1): 14-9.
[20]	Suljak JP, Hatibovic-Kofman SA. Fluoride release-adsorptionrelease system applied to fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Quintessence International. 1996; 27(9): 635-8.