Effect of Ultrasonic Scaling on Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneer Restorations Cemented to Tooth Structures: in Vitro Study

Amal Abdallah A. Abo-Elmagd^{1, 2,} and Ebtehal Mohammed³

¹Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Surgery, Misr for Science & Technology University, 6 October, Egypt

²Fixed Prosthodontics, Collage of Dentistry Qassim University, Qassim, 51432, Saudi Arabia

³Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University, 62511, Beni Suef, Egypt

Cite this paper:
Amal Abdallah A. Abo-Elmagd and Ebtehal Mohammed. Effect of Ultrasonic Scaling on Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneer Restorations Cemented to Tooth Structures: in Vitro Study. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research. 2019; 7(2):49-53. doi: 10.12691/ijdsr-7-2-5

Abstract

Background: This in vitro study was conducted to investigate the effect of ultrasonic scaling on debonding of lithium disilicate glass ceramic laminate veneers restorations cemented to tooth structure. Materials and Methods: 16 extracted sound upper anterior teeth were prepared to receive laminate veneer restorations. They were randomly assigned into 2 groups (n=8), as in group Non-US , the cemented fabricated laminate veneers were not exposed to ultrasonic scaling and in the ultrasonic group (US) the cemented fabricated laminate veneers were exposed to ultrasonic scaling. The GC Initial LiSi Press Lithium disilicate glass ceramics laminate veneers were fabricated according to manufacturer instructions. The debonding force test was applied after cementation and after ultrasonic scaling using Instrone testing machine. The obtained data were tabulated and analyzed statistically. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. Results: the recorded values of the debonding force mean ±SD for Non-US group were (79.5288 ±16.5228N) and mean ±SD values recorded for US group were (54.0713 ±8.2647 N). The T test showed significant difference between 2 groups (p value=0.0016) and 95% CI (29.45±14.0057). Conclusion(s): Within the limitations of this study, it was found that ultrasonic scaling significantly affect the debonding force of cemented laminate veneers.

Keywords:
debonding force laminate veneers lithium disilicate ceramics press ceramic ultrasonic scalar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Hari M, Poovani S. Porcelain laminate veneers: A review. J Adv Clin Res Insights 2017; 4: 187-190.
[2]	Strassler HE. Minimally invasive porcelain veneers: indications for a conservative esthetic dentistry treatment modality. Gen Dent 2007; 55: 686-94.
[3]	Pini NP, Aguiar FHB, Leite Lima DAN, Lovadino JR, Suga RS Terada, Pascotto RC. Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2012; 4: 9-16.
[4]	Della Bona A. Bonding to Ceramics: Scientific Evidences for Clinical Dentistry. São Paulo: Artes Médicas 2009; chapter 20: 252.
[5]	Giordano R, McLaren EA. Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010; 31: 682-4.
[6]	Sowmya S, Sunitha S, Dhakshaini MR, Raghavendraswamy K N. Esthetics with Veneers: A Review. International Journal of Dental Health Concerns 2015; 1, 1-5.
[7]	Garboza CS, Berger SB, Guiraldo RD, Fugolin AP, Gonini-Júnior A, Moura SK, Lopes MB. Influence of Surface Treatments and Adhesive Systems on Lithium Disilicate Microshear Bond Strength. Braz Dent J 2016; 27: 458- 62.
[8]	American Academy Periodontology (AAP): Comprehensive Periodontal Therapy: A Statement by the American Academy of Periodontology. J Periodontol 2011; 82.
[9]	Gehrig JN. Fundamentals of Periodontal Instrumentation & Advanced Root Instrumentation (7 th Edition), Ultrasonic and Sonic Instrumentation. 2012; 557.
[10]	Casarin RC, Ribeiro FV, Sallum A W, Sallum E A, Nociti-JR FH and Casati MZ. Root Surface Defect Produced by Hand Instruments and Ultrasonic Scaler with Different Power Settings: An in Vitro Study. Braz Dent J 2009; 20: 58-63.
[11]	Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service:Part II - Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 9-18.
[12]	Ohashi K, Kameyama Y, Wada Y, Midono T, Miyake K, Kunzelmann KH, Nihei T. evaluation and comparison of the characteristics of three pressable lithium disilicate glass ceramic materials. International Journal of Development Research 2017; 7: 16711-6.
[13]	Jepsen S, Deschner J, Braun A, Schwarz F, Eberhard J. Calculus removal and the prevention of its formation. Periodont 2000 2011; 55:167-8.
[14]	Checketts,MR, Turkyilmaz I , Asar N V. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1265-70.
[15]	Krishna R, DE Stefano JA: Ultrasonic vs. hand instrumentation in periodontal. Periodont 2000 2016; 71, 113-127.
[16]	Lai YL, Lin YC, Chang CS, Lee SY. Effects of sonic and ultrasonic scaling on the surface roughness of tooth-colored restorative materials for cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 273-8.
[17]	Voller RJ. Ultrasonic scalers: clinical use and benefits. Dent Today 2006; 25: 82-4.
[18]	Yoon HI, Noh HM, Park EJ. Surface changes of metal alloys and high strength ceramics after ultrasonic scaling and intraoral polishing. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9:188-94.
[19]	Rajeswari KC, Lumar MC. Effect of oral prophylactic instrumentation on the surface texture of all metal restorative materials. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015; 15: 39-45.
[20]	Chang B, Goldstein R, Lin CP, Byreddy S, Lawson CN. Microleakage around zirconia crown margins after ultrasonic scaling with self-adhesive resin or resin modified glass ionomer cement. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30: 73-80.
[21]	Melo Filho AB, Mori M, Jardini MAN, Landim KT, Solis ACO. Effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on the bond strength of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement to natural teeth. An in vitro study. Braz Oral Res 2008; 22: 270-4.