American Journal of Environmental Protection
ISSN (Print): 2328-7241 ISSN (Online): 2328-7233 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/env Editor-in-chief: Mohsen Saeedi, Hyo Choi
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Environmental Protection. 2016, 4(2), 55-60
DOI: 10.12691/env-4-2-3
Open AccessCase Study

Temporal Variations in the Characteristics of Pre-treated Effluents from a Brewery in Makurdi Metropolis-Nigeria

Iwar Raphael Terungwa1, Kola’ Ogedengbe2, and Oparaku L.A.3

1Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria

2Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

3Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, University of Agriculture, P.M.B 2373, Makurdi

Pub. Date: September 29, 2016

Cite this paper:
Iwar Raphael Terungwa, Kola’ Ogedengbe and Oparaku L.A.. Temporal Variations in the Characteristics of Pre-treated Effluents from a Brewery in Makurdi Metropolis-Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Protection. 2016; 4(2):55-60. doi: 10.12691/env-4-2-3

Abstract

In this study, physically, chemically and biologically pre-treated effluents from a brewery were characterized for a period of six months. This was to ascertain the type and concentrations of residual pollutants in the effluent streams released to a receiving perennial river in the study area. Effluent samples were collected at the outfall point for a consecutive period of six months, beginning from February, 2014. Samples were preserved and taken to the laboratory for tests on each sampling date. pH and Temperatures (ambient and effluent) were however determined in-situ. All samples were analyzed in accordance with the “standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater”. Pollutants concentrations in mg/l ranged between; 3.25-6.35, 76.4-183.0, 220.0-435.0, 55.1-85.0, 169.4-232.5, 4.70-6.6, 6.05-8.2 and 1.3-4.05 for DO, BOD5, COD, TSS, TDS, NO3-, PO4-3 and NH4+ respectively. Conductivity ranged between 307.0-405.5µs/cm, turbidity was between 24.2-41.35NTU, pH was 6.2-7.15, while ambient and water temperatures were 30.0-33.0 and 36.2-40.1 respectively. In comparison with FEPA and USEPA discharge limits, most of the pollutants were found to be residual in the effluents and need to be removed by suitable advanced and/or tertiary treatment method(s), before the effluents can be discharged into the perennial river in an environmentally friendly manner.

Keywords:
brewery effluents effluent characteristics river Benue temporal variations

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 6

References:

[1]  El-Shahaby, O.A., Abdel, M., Soliman, M.I., and Mashaly, I.A. (2003). Genotoxicology Screening of Industrial Wastewater using the Allium Cepa Chromosomes Aberration Assay. Pakistan Biological Sciences, 6 (1): 23-28.
 
[2]  Grover, I.S., and Kaur, S. (1999). Genotoxicity Screening of Wastewater Samples from Sewage and Industrial Effluent detected by the Allium Root Anaphase Aberration and Micronucleus Assays. Mutation Research, 426: 183-188.
 
[3]  Punmia, B.C., Arun, K.J., and Ashok, K.J. (2008).Wastewater Engineering. Laxmi Publications, New Delhi.
 
[4]  Rim-Rukeh, A. and Agbozu, I.E. (2006). Impact of partially treated Sewage Effluent on the Water Quality of Recipient Epie Creek Niger Delta, Nigeria using Malaysian Water Quality Index (WQI). Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 17 (1): 5-12.
 
[5]  Defew, L., Mair, J., and Guzman, H. (2004).An Assessment of Metal Contamination in Mangrove Sediments and Leaves from Punta Mala Bay, Pacific Panama.Marine Pollution Bulletin 50 (5): 547-552.
 
[6]  Sangodoyin, A.Y. (2012). Soil, Water and Wastes: A Complex Relationship. Inaugural Lecture delivered at the University of Ibadan on 28June, 2012. University Press, Ibadan
 
[7]  Madukasi, E.I., Zhou, J.J., He, C. (2012). Photosynthetic Bacteria Organic Wastewater Treatment: Effect of Anaerobic-Pretreatment. International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment, 2 (2), 188-195.
 
[8]  Zhu F.G., Li J.Z., Wu P., Jin H.Z., and Wang Z.(2008). The Performance and Phase Separated Characteristics of an Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Treating Soybean Protein Processing Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol., 99, 8027-8033
 
[9]  Tesfalem F. (2011). Impact of Brewery Effluent on River Water Quality: The case of Meta- Abo Brewery Factory and Finchewa River in Sebeta, Ethiopia. Msc. Thesis, Department of Environmental Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
 
[10]  Lenhardt, W. S. (1995). Personnel communication, April 17th & 18th.
 
[11]  Sawyer C.N., McCarty P.L. and Parkin P.L. (2004).Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science, 5th Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 110-175.
 
[12]  Belgiorno, V., Rizzo, L., Fatta, D., Roca, C.D., Lofrano, G., Nikolaou, A., Naddeo, V., and Meric, S. (2007). Review on Endocrine Disrupting-Emerging Compounds in Urban Wastewater: Occurrence and Removal by Photocatalysis and Ultrasonic Crops (flax, cotton and hemp), Indus. Crops Prod.19: 219-226.
 
[13]  Apeh, S. and O.E. Ezenta, (2012).Assessment of Surface Water Quality of River Benue at Makurdi. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JETEAS), 3(6): 904-913
 
[14]  American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005). Standard methods for Examination of water and Wastewater, 21th Edition, APHA, Washington D C.
 
[15]  Olafadehan, O.A., Jinadu, O.W., Salami, L., Popoola, O.T. (2012). Treatment of Brewery Wastewater Effluent using Activated Carbon prepared from Coconut Shell. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2 (1): 165-178.
 
[16]  Miroslav, R., and Vladimir, N.B. (1999). Practical Environmental Analysis.The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, U.K.
 
[17]  Ishaq, S. E., Agada, P. O., and Rufus, S. (2012). Spatial and Temporal Variation in Water Quality of River Benue, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Protection, 3: 915-921.