Hydrogeophysical Evaluation and Vulnerability Assessment of Shallow Aquifers of the Upper Imo River Basin, Southeastern Nigeria

Eke D.R.¹, Opara A.I.¹, Inyang G.E.¹, Emberga T.T.^2, , Echetama H.N.¹, Ugwuegbu C.A.¹, Onwe R.M.³, Onyema J.C.⁴ and Chinaka J.C⁴

¹Department of Geosciences, Federal University of Technology, PMB 1526 Owerri

²Department of Physics and Industrial Physics, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri

³Department of Physics/Gelogy/Geophysics, Federal Unuversity Ndufu-Alike Ikwo Abakaliki Ebonyi State

⁴Department of Physics, Imo State University, Owerri

Cite this paper:
Eke D.R., Opara A.I., Inyang G.E., Emberga T.T., Echetama H.N., Ugwuegbu C.A., Onwe R.M., Onyema J.C. and Chinaka J.C. Hydrogeophysical Evaluation and Vulnerability Assessment of Shallow Aquifers of the Upper Imo River Basin, Southeastern Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Protection. 2015; 3(4):125-136. doi: 10.12691/env-3-4-3

Abstract

Detailed hydrogeophysical study of the aquifers of the Upper Imo River Basin, Southeastern Nigeria was carried out to delineate the aquifers, evaluate their geometric characteristics and to assess their vulnerability of pollution from surface contaminants. Forty (40) Schlumberger Vertical Electrical Soundings (VES) were carried out in various parts of the study area with a maximum electrode separation of 1000 metres. Four parametric soundings were carried out at the exact positions of existing boreholes with available pumping test and electric log data for the purpose of comparison. The VES data were processed using a combination of curve matching techniques and computer iterative modeling. Layer parameters interpreted from the VES data together with the available well data were used to assess the vulnerability of the shallow aquifers using the DRASTIC model. Results of the study revealed the presence of 4-7 geoelectric layers with a multi-aquifer system. The aquifers are variable in thickness with Umuekwule having the thickest aquifer of 108m while Ukomo Ibeku has the least aquifer thickness of 1.7m. Similarly, depth to water table varies from 0.6m at Ajata ibeku to 91.8m at Umukabia. Information from iso-resistivity model and diagnostic factor revealed a distinct hydrogeological divide in line with the geology of the study area. The aquifer vulnerability index assessment revealed that about 55% of the study area falls within the moderate vulnerability zones with DRASTIC index values ranging from 102 to 140. About 30% of the study area have high vulnerability index while the remaining 15% of the study area have low vulnerability index with DRASTIC index values of between 85 and 99.

Keywords:
hydrogeophysical aquifer vulnerability drastic Vertical Electrical Sounding Imo River Basin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, J.H., Petty, R.J., and Hacket, G., 1985. DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Using Hydrological Settings. Ada, Ok, USA: Prepared by the National Water Well Association for the US EPA office of Research and Development.
[2]	Aller, L., Bennet, T., Lehr, J.H., Petty, R.J., 1987. DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Using Hydrological Settings. US EPA document no.EPA/600/2-85-018.
[3]	Dixon, B., 2005. Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping. A GIS and fuzzy rule based integrated tool. Applied Geography, 25(4), 327-347.
[4]	Egbai, J.C., 2011. Vertical electrical sounding for the determination of aquifer transmissivity. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5:120-1214.
[5]	Ekwe, A. C., Onu, N.N., and Onuoha, K.M., 2006. Estimation of Aquifer Hydraulic Characteristics from Electric Sounding Data: The case study of Middle Imo River Basin Aquifers, South Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Spatial Hydrology; Vol. 6, No 2, pages 121-132.
[6]	Engel B., Navular K., and Cooper B.L., 1996. Estimating groundwater vulnerability to non-point source pollution from Nitrates and Pesticides on a Regional Scale. International Association of Hydrological Science Publ. 235, 521-526.
[7]	Fritch, T. G., McKnight, C. L., Yelderman, J. C. and Arnold, J. G., 2000. Environmental auditing: An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Paluxy aquifer, Central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach; Journal of Environmental Management, 25(3),337-345.
[8]	Hearne, G. M., Wireman, A., Campbell, S., Turner, A. and Ingersall, G. P., 1992.Vulnerability of the uppermost groundwater to contamination in the Greater Denver Area, Colorado. USGS water-resources investigations report, 92-4143, 241pp.
[9]	Igbokwe, M.U., Okwueze, E. E. and Okereke, C.S. (2006). Delineation of Aquifer zones from Geoelectric Sounding in Kwa Ibo River Watershed, Southeastern Journal of Engineering and Applied science 1(4);410-421.
[10]	Joshua, E.O, Odeyemi, O.O and Fawehinmi, O.O., 2011. Geoelectric investigation of the groundwater potential of Moniya Area, Ibadan. Journal of Geol.Min.Res 3:54-62.
[11]	Keller, G. V., and Frischnechk, F.C., 1979. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 91-135.
[12]	Kim, Y. J. And Hamm, S., 1999. Assessment of the potential for groundwater contamination using the DRASTIC/EGIS technique, Cheongju area, South Korea. Hydrogeology Journal, 7(2), 227-235.
[13]	Mbonu, P.D.C., Ebeniro, J.O., Ofoegbu, C.O. and Ekine, A.S., 1991. Geoelectric Sounding for the Determination of Aquifer Characteristics in parts of Umuahia Area of Nigeria. Geophysics. 56(2): 284-291.
[14]	Navulur, K, and Engel, B., 1996. Evaluation of nitrate concentration in groundwater using NLEAP/GIS technology., ASAE meeting presentation, 96-3091, ASAE 1996, 1-19.
[15]	Niwas, S. and Singhal, D.C.,1981. Estimation of Aquifer Transmissivity from Dar-Zarrock parameters in porous media. Journal of Hydrology 50, 393-399.
[16]	Onuoha K.M. and Mbazi F.C.C., 1988. Aquifer Transmissivity from Electrical Sounding Data. The Case of Ajali Sandstone Aquifers, South-West of Enugu. In: Ofoegbu, C.O(Ed), Ground Water and Mineral Resources of Nigeria, Fried-vieweg and Sohn, Wiesbaden, 17-29.
[17]	Opara, A. I. Onu, N .N. and Okereafor , D.U. 2012. Geophysical Sounding for the Determination of Aquifer Hydraulic Characteristic from Dar-Zarrock parameters. Case Study of Ngor-Okpala, Imo River Basin Southeastern Nigeria; The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology 13(1), 590-603.
[18]	Osemeikhian, J. E. and Asokhia, M. B., 1985. Applied Geophysics for Engineers and Geologists; Mc-Graw Hill; p. 155.
[19]	Simpson, A., 1955. The Nigeria coalfields: The Geology of Parts of Onitsha, Owerri, and Benue Provinces: Geological Survey of Nigeria Bulletin 24.
[20]	Todd, D.K. (1980). Groundwater Hydrology: John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
[21]	Ugada, U., Opara, A.I., Emberga, T.T., Ibim, D.F., Omenikoro, A.I., and Womuru, E.N., 2013a. Delineation of Shallow Aquifers of Umuahia and Environs, Imo River Basin, Nigeria, Using Geo-Sounding Data; Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2013, 5, 1097-1109.
[22]	Ugada, U., Ibe, K.K., Akaolisa, C.Z. and Opara, A.I., 2013b. Hydrogeophysical evaluation of aquifer hydraulic characteristics using surface geophysical data: a case Study of Umuahia and environs, Southeastern Nigeria; Arab J Geosci.
[23]	Uma, K.O. (1989). An appraisal of the Groundwater Resources of the Imo River Basin: Nigerian Journal of Mining and Geology, Vol. 25 No. 1 and 2, pp 305-315.
[24]	USEPA., 1985. DRASTIC: A standard system for evaluating groundwater potential using hydrogeology settings. Ada, Oklahoma WA/EPA series p 163.