The Use of a Kinematic Constraint Map to Prepare the Structure for a Dimensional Variation Analysis Model

L.C. Sleath^1, and P.G. Leaney¹

¹Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

Cite this paper:
L.C. Sleath and P.G. Leaney. The Use of a Kinematic Constraint Map to Prepare the Structure for a Dimensional Variation Analysis Model. American Journal of Vehicle Design. 2013; 1(1):1-8. doi: 10.12691/ajvd-1-1-1

Abstract

Dimensional variation analysis (DVA) models are widely used in the automotive industry to predict how minor variations in the size, shape and location of the component parts are likely to propagate throughout a body structure, suspension, engine or transmission system and how this will affect the overall assembly, operation and performance. This paper is one of in series of four papers that describe how different techniques can be utilised to aid the creation and application of DVA models. This paper explains the development and use of the kinematic constraint map (KCM) method to prepare, in aDVAnce, the most appropriate structure for a DVA model. The KCM method provides a concise and comprehensive graphical method that, in one document, can identify all the physical constraints that govern the location and (where applicable) the motion of each component within a complete mechanical system. Once complete, the KCM for a mechanical system contains sufficient information to fully define the structure of the subsequent DVA model. The other three papers cover the use of virtual fixtures, jigs and gauges to achieve the necessary component location and the required variation measurements; the use of two stage DVA models to simulate interdependence between different model configurations and the use of 3D plots to display large numbers of DVA results as a single 3D shape.

Keywords:
dimensional variation analysis variation modelling kinematic constraint mapping

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Söderberg, R. Lindkvist, L. Carlson, J.S, Managing physical dependencies through location system design, Journal of Engineering Design, 17, 4, 325-346, 2006.
[2]	Harper, A.P,Jaguar’s approach to dimensional control in product development, colloquium on dimensional variation (Digest No 1997/346) 1997.
[3]	Cleverly, D.J,Olifent, A.M.D, Rover’s approach to dimensional variation, colloquium on dimensional variation (Digest No 1997/346) 1997.
[4]	Held D.O, Assembly variation analysis: Chrysler’s tool for upfront dimensional management, Society of Manufacturing Engineeers, TE920272, 1992.
[5]	Staif J, Dimensional management process applied to automotive door systems, Society of Automotive Engineers TP982305, 1998.
[6]	Rizvi A, Dimensional management – setting static and dynamic dimensional goals concurrently, Society of Automotive Engineers TP 2002-01-2004, 2002.
[7]	Chery Automobile Co. Ltd, Quality drives Chinese automaker; on route to creating a world famous name, Siemens, available from http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_gb/about_us/sucess/case_study.cfm?Componet=131067&ComponetTemplate= 1481, accessed June 2013.
[8]	Kim Y.S, Jang D.Y, Optimisation of geometric dimension & tolerance parameters of front suspension systems for vehicle pulls improvement, Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol 33, Issue 9, 2009, pp903-912.
[9]	Queckenberg A., Rollout of a JT process chain, Daimler AG, ProSTEPiViP Symposium, Berlin, 2009.
[10]	Gomer P, Tolerance Analysis Model Management Using StackManager, Chrysler Group LLC, Sigmetrix U2U conference, DallasUSA, October 25-26 2012.
[11]	Balachandran A,Crank Cam Timing Error Calculation – A CE Assembly Variation Analysis, Chrysler Group LLC, Sigmetrix U2U conference, DallasUSA, October 25-26 2012.
[12]	Shuxin G, Tolerance design in powertrain product creation process, Journal of ADVAnced Manufacturing Systems, 05, 167 2006.
[13]	McFadden, C.D, Application of system design tools to integrate product development process, MSc thesis, University of South Carolina, 2005.
[14]	Zheng, L.Y, McMahon, C.A, Li1, L, Ding L, Jamshidi, J, Key characteristics management in product lifecycle management: a survey of methodologies and practices, Proc. IMechE Vol. 222 Part B: 2008.
[15]	Day, J, 787 Dimensional management, Boeing Corporation, 2005, available from http: //www.lvmc.org.uk., accessed June 2013.
[16]	Astles, S, Dimension management, the reasons for change,AirbusUK, 2005, available from http://www.3dcs.com/downloads/airbus.pdf, accessed June 2013.
[17]	Robert, E.B, Best practice: F-22 variability reduction, Lockheed Martin,2005, available fromhttp://www.bmpcoe.org/bestpractices/internal/lmtas/lmtas_18.html, accessed June 2013.
[18]	Pritchett, J, Losing the loop of the digital thread”, Lockheed Martin, 2005, available fromhttp://web.mit.edu/lmp/Presentations/Pritchett-Lockheed.pdf, accessed June 2013.
[19]	Spicknall, M.H, Kumar, R, and Huang, T.D, Dimensional management in shipbuilding: a case study fromthe Northrup Grumman Ship Systems LightweightStructures Project,J. Ship Prod., 2005, 21(4), 209-218.
[20]	Jeffreys, D,Leaney, P.G, Dimensional control as an integral part of next-generation aircraft development, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture, 2000, 214(B9), 831-835.
[21]	Craig, M, Variation by design, Mechanical Engineering, 110, pp52-54, November 1988.
[22]	Craig, M, Dimensional management versus tolerance assignment, Assembly Automation,Volume 16, Number 2, 1996, 12-16.
[23]	Craig, M, Dimensional management: a necessary process to meet corporate goals for global competition, colloquium on dimensional variation (Digest No 1997/346) 1997.
[24]	Ceglarek, D,Shi, J, Dimensional variation reduction for automotive body assembly,Mfg Rev., 1995, 8(2), 139-154.
[25]	Loose,J.P, Zhou, O, Zhou, S,Ceglarek, D, Integrating GD&T into dimensional variation models for multistage machining processes,International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 48, No. 11, 1 June 2010, 3129-3149.
[26]	Sleath, D.M, Leaney, P.G, Control of dimensional variation and integrated product development, colloquium on dimensional variation (Digest No 1997/346) 1997.
[27]	Booker, J.D, Swift, K.G, Brown, N.J, Designing for assembly quality: strategies, guidelines and techniques, Journal of Engineering Design, 16:3, 279-295.
[28]	Bourjault, A, Contribution á uneApproacheMéthodologique de L’ Assemblage Automatisé: Elaborationautomatique des sequences Opératoires, Docteur des Sciences Physiques Thesis, 1984,Université de Fanche – Comté, Besancon, France
[29]	Baldwin, D.F,Abell, T.E., Lui, M.C, M. De Fazio, T.L, Whitney, D.E, An integrated computer aid for generating and evaluating assembly sequences for mechanicalproducts, E Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1991,Vol 7, 1, pp 78-94.
[30]	Dini, G. Santochi, M. (1992) Automated sequencing and subassembly detection in assembly planning. Annals of the CIRP 41, 1, pp 1-4.
[31]	Ou, L. Xu, X. (2013) Relationship matrix based automatic assembly sequence generation from a CAD model. Computer-Aided Design, 45 (2013), pp1053-1067.
[32]	Xu, L.D. Wang, C. Bi, Z. Yu,J. (2012) AutoAssem: An automated assembly planning system for complex products. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 8, 3, August 2012, pp669-678.
[33]	ASME Y14.5-2009, Dimensioning and Tolerancing; Engineering Drawing and related documentation practices, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
[34]	Krulikowski, A, Fundamentals of Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing, second edition, Delmar Cenage Learning, 2007, Clifton Park, New York, USA.
[35]	Whitney, D.E, Mantripragada, R, Adams, D, Rhee, S.J, Designing Assemblies, Research in Engineering Design 1999, 1, 229-253.
[36]	Adams, J.D, Whitney, D.E, Application of screw theory to constraint analysis of mechanical assemblies joined by features, Journal of Mechanical Design, 123, 2001, March, 26-32.
[37]	Gerbino, S,Arrichiello, F, How to investigate constraints and motions in assemblies by screw theory.Proceedings of the 4thCIRP International Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering (ICME), pp331-336,Sorrento, Italy, 30 June-2 July 2004.
[38]	Whitney, D.E, Connectivity limits of mechanical assemblies modelled as networks.MIT, Engineering Systems Division, working paper series, ESD-WP-004-07, 2004.
[39]	Whitney, D.E, Mechanical Assemblies; Their design, manufacture and role in product development,Oxford University Press, 2004,pp 86-101.
[40]	Whitney, D.E, The role of key characteristics in the design of mechanical assemblies, Assembly Automation, 2006, 26(4), 315-322.
[41]	Mathieu, L,Marguet, B, Integrated design method to improve producibility based on product keycharacteristics and assembly sequences, CIRP Annals, Manufacturing technology, 50, 1, 2001, pp 85-88.
[42]	Ballu, A. Mathieu, L,Choice of functional specifications using graphs within the framework of education, 6thCIRP International Seminar on , Enschede, 1999, pp 197-206.
[43]	Whitney, D.E, Mechanical Assemblies; Their design, manufacture and role in product development. OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, 2004, pp 53-55.
[44]	Chase, K.W, Parkinson A.R,A survey of research in the application of tolerance analysis to the design ofmechanical assemblies, Research in Engineering Design, 1991, 3:23-37.
[45]	Gao, J, Chase, K.W. Magleby, S P, Generalized 3-D tolerance analysis of mechanical assemblies with small kinematic adjustments, Transactions, 1998, 30,367-377.
[46]	Sleath,L.C, Leaney,P.G, The use of a two stage dimensional variation analysis model to simulate the action of a hydraulic tappet adjustor in a car engine valve train system,Loughborough University, UK, 2013.