Fishing the Temporal Semicommons- A Case Study on the Traditional Paddy Field Wetland Fisheries of Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh, India

Kanna K. Siripurapu^1, and Faisal Moola²

¹,2Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

²1,2Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

Cite this paper:
Kanna K. Siripurapu and Faisal Moola. Fishing the Temporal Semicommons- A Case Study on the Traditional Paddy Field Wetland Fisheries of Srikakulam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. American Journal of Rural Development. 2026; 14(1):6-10. doi: 10.12691/ajrd-14-1-2

Abstract

Man-made wetlands, such as paddy fields of Asia present an interesting case of the semicommons. The traditional rice-fish cultures are well documented in North-eastern India, but poorly understood in other parts of the country. In this context the present study attempts to explore the semicommons in the context of man-made paddy field wetlands in Srikakulam district of Andhra Pradesh, India by adopting the temporal semicommons framework. The findings of the present study suggest that paddy field wetlands are used as private rice fields with very defined private property rights when the rice crop is standing and are open to the public for fishing after harvesting of the rice crop. The transition and reversibility of property rights and ownership of paddy fields at different time scales under different ownership rubrics presents an interesting instance of the temporal semicommons. However, further studies are necessary to investigate the different facets of paddy field wetland fisheries from the lens of property rights perspective.

Keywords:
commons semicommons traditional fisheries property rights property regimes paddy fields srikakulam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Smith, H.E. (2000). Semicommon Property Rights and Scattering in the Open Fields. The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 131-169.
[2]	Fennell, L.A. (2009). "Commons, Anticommons, Semicommons" (John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 457, University of Chicago Law School. Retrieved from: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1110&context=law _and_economics.
[3]	Michelman, F.I. (1985). “Is the Tragedy of the Common Inevitable?” Remarks at Property Panel, AALS, January 1985 (unpublished manuscript, on file with author).
[4]	Smith, H.E. (2008). “Governing Water: The Semicommons of Fluid Property Rights.” Arizona Law Review 50: 445-78.
[5]	Smith, H.E. (2002). “Exclusion Versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights.” Journal of Legal Studies 31: S453-88.
[6]	Chopra, K. and Dasgupta, P. (2002). Common pool resources in India: Evidence, significance and new management initiatives. Policy Implications of Common Pool Resources Knowledge in India, Tanzania and Zimbabwe.
[7]	Chopra, K., Kadekodi, G.K. & Murty, M.N. (1990). Participatory development: people and common property resources. New Delhi, Sage Publications.
[8]	Iyengar, S. (1988). Common property land resources in Gujarat: some findings about their size, status and use. Gota, Ahmedabad, India, Gujarat Institute of Area Planning.
[9]	Jodha, N.S. (1985a). Market forces and erosion of common property resources. In Agriculture markets in the semi - arid tropics: proceedings of an international workshop, 24-28 de October de 1983. Patancheru, India, ICRISAT.
[10]	Jodha, N.S. (1985b). Population growth and the decline of common property resources in Rajasthan, India. Pop. Dev. Rev., 11(2).
[11]	Jodha, N.S. (1986). Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 21(27).
[12]	Jodha, N.S. (1990a). Depletion of common property resources in India: micro-level evidence. In G. McNicoll & M. Cain, eds. Rural development and population: institutions and policy. New York, Oxford University Press.
[13]	Jodha, N.S. (1990b). Rural common property resources: contributions and crisis. Foundation Day Lecture. New Delhi, Society for Promotion of Wasteland Development.
[14]	Jodha, N.S. (1992). Rural common property resources: the missing dimension of development strategies. Washington, D.C., World Bank.
[15]	Shah, T. (1987). Profile of collective action on common property: community fodder form in Kheda district. Anand, Gujarat, India, Institute of Rural Management.
[16]	Shankarnarayan, K.A. and Kalla, J.C. (1985). Management systems for natural vegetation. Jodhpur, Rajasthan, Central Arid Zone Research Institute.
[17]	Welcomme R.L., Cowx I.G., Coates D., Bene C., Funge-Smith S., Halls A., and Lorenzen K. (2010). Inland Capture Fisheries. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 365(1554): 2881–2896.
[18]	Das, D.N. (2018). Farming of fishes in rice-fields of Northeast India: A review. Journal of Coldwater Fisheries 1(1): 27-41.
[19]	Allison, E.H. and Badjeck, M.C. (2004). Fisheries Co-Management in Inland Waters: A Review of International Experience. Sustainable Fisheries Livelihoods Programme. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the Department for International Development (DFID). https://www.fao.org/fishery/docs/DOCUMENT/sflp/SFLP_publications/from_lib/aj2 68e00.pdf.
[20]	UIDAI (Unique Identification Authority of India), (2021-22). Annual Report 2021-22. Government of India, New Delhi. Retrieved from: https:// uidai.gov.in/ images/ UIDAI_ Annual_Report_21_22.pdf.
[21]	Census India, (2011). Seethampeta Mandal Population, Caste, Religion Data – Srikakulam district, Andhra Pradesh. Census 2011 Data. Govt. of India. https:// www.censusindia.co.in/ subdistrict/ seethampeta-mandal-srikakulam-andhra- pradesh-4770.
[22]	Ramesh, D. and Haranath, Ch.B. (2020). Factors inhibiting and promoting change in development and welfare programmes among the tribal communities: A study in the tribal areas of Andhra Pradesh. Andhra University, India. https:// www.andhrauniversity.edu.in/img/news/UGC-FINAL-REPORT-28022020.pdf.
[23]	Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
[24]	Morgan, D.L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[25]	Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., and Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
[26]	Baumgartner, T. A., Strong, C. H., & Hensley, L. D. (2002). Conducting and reading research in health and human performance (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[27]	Johnson, R.B., and Christensen, L.B. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[28]	Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Jiao, Q.G., and Bostick, S.L. (2004). Library anxiety: Theory, research, and applications. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow.
[29]	Butina, M. (2015). A Narrative Approach to Qualitative Inquiry. Clinical Laboratory Sciences, 28(3): 190.
[30]	Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Choosing among Five approaches. CA: Sage.
[31]	Venugopal, K and Kumar L.V. (2013). Consumption Pattern of Tribals – A Study in Seetampeta Mandal, Srikakulam District. International Journal of Innovative Research and Practice.
[32]	Nguyen Khoa S., Lorenzen K., Garaway C., Chamsingh B., Siebert D. J., and Randone M. (2005). Impacts of irrigation on fisheries in rain-fed rice-farming landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 892–900.
[33]	Hortle K. G., Troeung R., and Lieng S. (2008). Yield and value of the wild fishery of rice fields in Battambang Province, near the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia. MRC Technical Paper No. 18 62pp.
[34]	Janssen M.A., Anderies J.M. and Ostrom E. (2007) Robustness of Social-Ecological Systems to Spatial and Temporal Variability. Society and Natural Resources, 20(4): 307-322.
[35]	Makavarapu, L.S., Yesudas, S. and Sakkari, K. (2014). Indigenous plant foods which are commonly consumed by the tribal communities in Dumbriguda area of Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Biolife, 2(3): 866-875.
[36]	Zanjani L.V., Govan H., Jonas H.C., Karfakis T., Mwamidi D.M., Stewart J., Walters G., and Dominguez P. (2023). Territories of life as key to global environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 63:101298.