Diagnostic Role of Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis: A Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Subash K C^1, , Abhijit De², Mahesh Pathak¹ and Brijesh Sathian³

¹Department of Radiodiagnosis & Imaging, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal

²Medical Officer, Park Clinic, Kolkata, India

³Department of Community Medicine, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal

Cite this paper:
Subash K C, Abhijit De, Mahesh Pathak and Brijesh Sathian. Diagnostic Role of Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis: A Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2015; 3(5A):23-28. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-3-5A-6

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is commonest cause of acute abdomen necessitating emergency abdominal surgery. Although diagnosis is still largely considered to be a clinical one, ultrasound is established as easily available, less time consuming and very accurate at timely diagnosis of acute appendicitis largely reducing complications as well as negative laparotomies. Due to development of high frequency transducers and better resolution, ultrasound is highly specific and sensitive in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. This study was done to establish the diagnostic role of ultrasound in acute appendicitis in western region of Nepal. Total number of 125 patients were included in the study from May 2013 to May 2015. Findings on ultrasound were finally compared with histopathological report of appendices removed on surgery. Those cases with alternate diagnosis were followed up and proved with other means of investigation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in our study were found to be 95.12 %, 88.88 %, 97.5% , 80% and 82 % respectively.

Keywords:
appendicitis ultrasonography specificity Nepal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Treutner KH, Schumpelick V. Epidemiology of appendicitis. Chirurg 1997; 68:1-5.
[2]	Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiology 1990;132:910-25.
[3]	Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr., Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology. 1999; 213(2):341-6.
[4]	Abu-Yousef MM, Bleicher JJ, Maher JW, UrdanetaLF , Franken. EA Jr, Metcalf AM, High-resolution sonography of acute appendicitis. AJR 1987; 149:53-8.
[5]	Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(6):886-92.
[6]	Abu-Yousef MM. Ultrasonography Of Right Lower Quadrant. Ultrasound Quarterly 2001;17(4):221-5.
[7]	Puylaert J. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986; 158:355-60.
[8]	Sathian B, Sreedharan J, Baboo NS, Sharan K, Abhilash ES, Rajesh E. Relevance of Sample Size Determination in Medical Research. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 1(1):4-10.
[9]	Lewis FB, Holcroft JW, Boey J, Dumphy E A Critical Review Of DiagnosisAnd Treatment In 1000 Cases, Arch Of Sur, 1975; 110:677-84.
[10]	Tauro Lf, Premanand T S, Aithala P S, George C, Suresh H B, Acharya D, John P. Ultrasonography Is Still A Useful Diagnostic Tool In Acute Appendicitis, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2009 Oct; 3:1731-36Wilson, Stephine R. Gastrointestinal tract. In: Carol M. Rumack, Stephine R Wilson, J. William charbaneau [ed]; Diagnostic Ultrasound, 2nd ed; Missouri, Mosby; 1998; Volume 1: 303-6.
[11]	Sohail et al. Doptaus – a simple criterion for improving sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis J Pak Med Assoc 2009; 59: 79-82.
[12]	Nicolas Kessler, MD Catherine Cyteval, MD, PhD BenoıˆtGallix, MD, PhD AlvianLesnik, MD Paul-Marie Blayac, MD Joseph Pujol, MD Jean-Michel Bruel, MD Patrice Taourel, MD, PhD Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US and laboratory findings Radiology 2004; 230:472-8.
[13]	Doraiswamy N.V. Leucocyte counts in the diagnosis and prognosis of acute appendicitis in children. Br. J. Surg. 1979; 66:782.
[14]	Gaensler,R, Erik H.L. Brooke Jeffrey, Jr. Faye C Laing, Ronald R Townsend; Sonography In Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis: value in establishing alternative diagnoses; AJR 1989; 152:49-51.
[15]	Ooms HWA, Koumans RKJ, Ho Kang Yu PJ, Puylaert JBCM, Ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1991; 78:315-18. Puylaert JBCM. The appendix. In: David Cosgrove, HyltonMeire, Keith Dewbury [ed]. Abdominal and General Ultrasound; Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone; 1994; Volume 2: 779-84.
[16]	George MJ, Siba PP, Charan PK, Rao RRM. Evaluation of Ultrasonography as a useful Diagnostic Aid in Appendicitis. Indian J Surg. 2002; 64: 436-9.
[17]	Jeffery RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 patients. Radiology 1988; 167:327-9.
[18]	Michel RiouxSonographic Detection Of The Normal And Abnormal Appendix, AJR 1992; 158: 773-8.
[19]	Lee JH, Jeong YK, Park KB, Park JK, Jeong AK, Hwang JC. Operator dependent techniques for graded compression son ography to detect the appendix and diagnose acute appendicitis, AJR. 2005 Jan; 184(1): 91-7.
[20]	Thomas Rettenbacher, AloisHollerweger, Peter Macheiner, Lukas Rettenbacher, Robert Frass, Barbara Schneider, et al presence or absence of gas in the appendix: additional criteria to rule out or confirm acute appendicitis-evaluation with ultrasound, Radiology 2000; 214:183-7.
[21]	Grebeldinger S. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Med. Pregl. 1996; 49:487-91.
[22]	Skanne P, Amland P.F., Nordshus T. et al. Ultrasonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. A prospective study. Br. Jr. Radiol, 1990; 63:787-93.
[23]	Hahn HB, Hoepner FU., Kalle T et al. Sonography of acute appendicitis in children: 7 years experience. Paediatr. Radiol 1998; 28:147-51.
[24]	Tarjan Z., Mako E., Winternitz T., et al. The value of ultrasonic diagnosis in acute appendicitis. Orv. Hetil. 1995; 136:713-7.
[25]	Puylaert JB. A prospective study of Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. NEJM, 1987; 317:666-9.
[26]	Joshi HM, Patel VB, Dave AN, Ultrasonographic Evaluation Of AcuteAppendicitis, Ind J RadiolImag, 1996; 2:75-8.
[27]	Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, Goff WB, Accuracy Of Ultrasound InThe Diagnosis Of Acute Appendicitis With Surgeon’s Impression, Arch Of Surgery 1993; 128:1039-46.
[28]	Cheshbrough RM, Burkhard TK, Balsara ZN, Goff WB II, Davis DJ, Self- Localization In Ultrasound Of Appendicitis: An Addition To The Graded Compression. Radiology, 1993; 187:349-51.
[29]	Yacoe ME, Jeffrey B Jr Sonography of appendicitis and Diverticulitis RadiolClin N Am 1994; 32:899-912.
[30]	Emmie M. Fa and John J. Cronan compression sonography as an aid in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics; October 1989; 169:290-98.
[31]	Wolf B. Schwerk, Britta Wichtrup, Matthias Rothmund, Joseph Ruschoff, Ultrasonograpgy In The Diagnosis Of Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Study, Gastroenterology Sept 1989: 630-9.
[32]	Matteo Baldisserotto, Edson Marclniosi, accuracy of noncompressiveSonography of children according to the potential positions of the appendix, AJR 2000;175:1387-92.
[33]	Ida Chan, Simon G. Bicknell, Mary Graham, Utility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Detecting Appendicitis in a Community HospitalAJR 2005;184:1809-12.