From Nhis to Nhia: A Comparative Evaluation of Preventive Healthcare Utilization Before and after the Health Insurance Reform

Whitney Adaeze Onuorah^1,

¹Department of Nursing and Community Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Cite this paper:
Whitney Adaeze Onuorah. From Nhis to Nhia: A Comparative Evaluation of Preventive Healthcare Utilization Before and after the Health Insurance Reform. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2025; 13(4):184-187. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-13-4-6

Abstract

Introduction: The transition from the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) marked a major policy shift in the pursuit of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in Nigeria. While NHIS coverage was limited and skewed toward curative services, the NHIA was introduced in 2022 to expand coverage, mandate enrollment, and integrate preventive healthcare into benefit packages. This study aimed to evaluate changes in preventive healthcare utilization before and after the reform, comparing the performance of NHIS and NHIA models in selected Nigerian states. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted across three geopolitical zones using mixed methods. Quantitative data were collected from 403 NHIS/NHIA enrollees using structured questionnaires, while facility records and key informant interviews supplemented the data. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 25.0, employing chi-square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression. Qualitative data from 15 interviews were thematically analyzed using NVivo. Results: Preventive service utilization significantly increased under NHIA. Hypertension screenings rose from 41.3% to 65.3%; diabetes screenings from 35.8% to 59.4%; and cervical cancer screenings from 22.6% to 45.1%. Education level, employment status, and awareness of benefits were strong predictors of utilization. Key informants noted improvements in benefit coverage and digital tracking under NHIA, though challenges such as poor rural access, workforce shortages, and funding delays persisted. Discussion: The findings suggest that NHIA has improved preventive healthcare uptake compared to NHIS, reflecting the policy’s enhanced structure and focus. However, persistent structural and systemic barriers may limit long-term impact. To fully realize NHIA’s potential, Nigeria must invest in health infrastructure, workforce capacity, and public health education. The study reinforces that policy reform alone is insufficient without complementary operational and social investments. Conclusion: NHIA has made notable strides in enhancing preventive healthcare utilization compared to the NHIS. Nevertheless, ongoing systemic challenges require targeted investment and stakeholder collaboration to sustain and scale these improvements. Comprehensive reform must go beyond policy frameworks to include equitable implementation, especially for underserved populations.

Keywords:
NHIS NHIA preventive healthcare healthcare utilization health insurance and Nigeria

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Awojobi, O. N. (2019). A systematic review of the impact of the National Health Insurance.
[2]	Ipinnimo, T. M., Omotoso, A. A., Bamidele, T. A., Sanni, T. A., Ibirongbe, D. O., Ipinnimo, M. T., & Ibikunle, O. O. (2023). Comparing the Nigeria National Health Insurance Scheme Act, 2004 and the National Health Insurance Authority Act, 2022 – What is New and its.
[3]	Ilesanmi, O. S., Afolabi, A. A., &Adeoya, C. T. (2023). Driving the implementation of the National Health Act of Nigeria to improve the health of her population. The Pan African Medical Journal, 45, Article 157.
[4]	Ahmad, D. M., & LuceroPrisno III, D. E. (2022). The new National Health Insurance Act of Nigeria: How it will insure the poor and ensure universal health coverage. Population Medicine. [online] Retrieved from Population Medicine.
[5]	Implications for the Health System. West African Journal of Medicine, 40(5), 525–532 National Health Insurance Authority (2022). Vulnerable Group Fund. https:// www.nhia.gov.ng/ vulnerable-group/.
[6]	Pillah, T. P. (2023). Evaluation of the performance and challenges of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Nigeria (2004–2021). Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable.
[7]	Eze, O. I., Iseolorunkanmi, A., &Adeloye, D. (2024). The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in Nigeria: Current issues and implementation challenges. Journal of Global Health Economics and Policy, 4, e2024002.
[8]	Ofoli, J. N. T., Ashau-Oladipo, T., Hati, S. S., Ati, L., & Ede, V. (2020). Preventive healthcare uptake in private hospitals in Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey (Nisa Premier Hospital). BMC Health Services Research, 20, Article 273.
[9]	Uguru, N., Ogu, U., Uguru, C., & Ibe, O. (2024). Is the National Health Insurance Scheme a pathway to sustained access to medicines in Nigeria?BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), Article 10827.
[10]	World Health Organization (2006). Witter, S., &Garshong, B. Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme: Experience and Lessons Learned. Harvard School of Public Health.
[11]	Adeniran, A., Wright, K. O., Aderibigbe, A., Akinyemi, O., Fagbemi, T., Ayodeji, O., Omoyeni, A., Abiola, A., Zamba, E., Abdur-Razzaq, H., Oniyire, F., Ogboye, O., & Abayomi, A. (2024).
[12]	Raghupathi, V., &Raghupathi, W. (2020). The influence of education on health: An empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995–2015. Archives of Public Health, 78, 20.