Role of Theory and Research in Policy Development in Health Care System

Abdulaziz Mohsen Alsufyani^1,

¹Taif Comprehensive Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development, Saudi Arabia

Cite this paper:
Abdulaziz Mohsen Alsufyani. Role of Theory and Research in Policy Development in Health Care System. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2020; 8(2):61-66. doi: 10.12691/ajphr-8-2-4

Abstract

The implementation of actions for health is only possible by adequate policy development. There is a need to review the nature and development of policy in health political science gaze. Therefore, the present study aims to conduct a review on theory and researches to develop adequate policies in health care system. It provides a comprehensive review about the important theories with empirical research evidences for promoting health. The review analysis shows that it is important to understand the theory and approach behind policy development to recognize the incremental nature of aspects involved in policy development. The health political science insights need to be embraced in the light of public health and promotion of health. The present study has provided deep understanding about the structuring and implementation of health policies in health care systems in the light of theory and research.

Keywords:
development health care system policy public health research stakeholders theory

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	McLeroy, K.R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A. and Glanz, K., “An ecological perspective on health promotion programs,” Health education quarterly, 15 (4). 351-77. Dec.1988.
[2]	Buse, K., Mays, N. and Walt, G. Making health policy, McGraw-hill education (UK), 2012.
[3]	Dye, T.R., Top down policymaking. Chatham House Pub, 2001.
[4]	Australian Health Promotion Association. Core Competencies for Health Promotion Practitioners. Maroochydore: AHPA, University of the Sunshine Coast, 2009.
[5]	De Leeuw, E. and Breton, E., “Policy change theories in health promotion research: a review,” Health promotion and the policy process, 23. 42. Sep.2013.
[6]	Kleinman, A., “Four social theories for global health,” The Lancet, 375 (9725). 1518-1519. May.2010.
[7]	Gore, R. and Parker, R., Analysing power and politics in health policies and systems, 2019.
[8]	Forman, L., “The Ghost Is the Machine: How Can We Visibilize the Unseen Norms and Power of Global Health?: Comment on" Navigating Between Stealth Advocacy and Unconscious Dogmatism: The Challenge of Researching the Norms, Politics and Power of Global Health,” International journal of health policy and management, 5 (3). 197. Mar.2016.
[9]	Gomez, E., Introduction: The state of political science research in global health politics and policy. Global Health Governance, 2016, 3-8.
[10]	Parker, R., García, J. and editors. Routledge Handbook on the politics of global health. Routledge, 2018.
[11]	Storeng, K.T. and Mishra, A., Politics and practices of global health: Critical ethnographies of health systems.
[12]	Mackenbach, J., “Political determinants of health,” European Journal of Public Health, 24. 2. 2014.
[13]	Milstead, J.A. (Ed.)., Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2004.
[14]	Mason, D.J., Gardner, D.B., Outlaw, F.H. and O’Grady, E.T., Policy & Politics in Nursing and Health Care-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2020.
[15]	Lewin, K., Field Theory in Social Science. Harper and Row: New York, 1951.
[16]	Sabatier, P.A., “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein,” Policy sciences. 21 (2-3): 129-168. Jun.1988.
[17]	Sabatier, P.A., “The need for better theories.” Theories of the policy process, 2. 3-17. Jan.1999.
[18]	Sabatier, P.A., Jenkins-Smith HC. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Westview Pr, 1993.
[19]	Nowlin, M.C., “Theories of the policy process: state of the research and emerging trends,” Policy Studies Journal, 39. 41–60. Apr.2011.
[20]	Kingdon, J.W., Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1984.
[21]	Baumgartner, F. and Jones, B. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
[22]	Laumann, E.O. and Knoke, D., The Organizational State. Social Choice in National Policy. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
[23]	Börzel, T.A., “Organizing Babylon - on the different conceptions of policy networks,” Public administration, 76. 253-273. 1998.
[24]	McCarthy, J.D. and Zald, M.N., “Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory,” American Journal of Sociology, 82. 1212-1241. May.1977.
[25]	Birckmayer, J.D. and Weiss, C.H., “Theory-based evaluation in practice: what do we learn?,” Evaluation Review, 24. 407-431. Aug.2000.
[26]	Gonzalez, M. and Glantz, S.A., “Failure of policy regarding smoke-free bars in the Netherlands,” European Journal of Public Health, 23. 139-145. 2013.
[27]	Hill, M. and Hupe, P., “Analysing policy processes as multiple governance: accountability in social policy,” Policy & Politics, 34. 557-573. Jul.2006.
[28]	Mazmanian, D.A. and Sabatier, P.A., Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1983.
[29]	Bemelmans-Videc, M.L., Rist, R.C. and Vedung, E. Carrots, Sticks & Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1998.
[30]	Edella, S. and Weible, C.M., “New Theories of the Policy Process: Policy Process,” Policy Studies Journal, 41 (3). 389-396. 2013.