American Journal of Nursing Research
ISSN (Print): 2378-5594 ISSN (Online): 2378-5586 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajnr Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Nursing Research. 2021, 9(6), 191-199
DOI: 10.12691/ajnr-9-6-2
Open AccessArticle

Glasgow-Blatchford versus Rockall Scoring Systems for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Dina Mohamed Mohamed1 and Asmaa Abdel Rahman Abdel Rahman2,

1Critical Care Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

2Medical Surgical Nursing department, Faculty of Nursing, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Pub. Date: November 15, 2021

Cite this paper:
Dina Mohamed Mohamed and Asmaa Abdel Rahman Abdel Rahman. Glasgow-Blatchford versus Rockall Scoring Systems for Predicting Outcomes of Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. American Journal of Nursing Research. 2021; 9(6):191-199. doi: 10.12691/ajnr-9-6-2

Abstract

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common emergency and potentially fatal health problem that associated with high mortality and morbidity. Gastrointestinal endoscopy can identify the cause of bleeding and remains the cornerstone of diagnosis and therapy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and Rockall score in predicting the clinical outcomes of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding during hospitalization. Study design: Retrospective observational cohort research design was used to conduct this study. Setting: This study was conducted in the medicine department 1 and 2 at medical hospital affiliated to Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. Subjects: Purposive sample of 95 adult patients who were admitted to the previously mentioned settings from October 2020 to March 2021 were included in the study. Data collection tools: (1) Patients' Clinical Outcomes Assessment Questionnaire, (2) The Glasgow-Blatchford Scale, (3) The pre-endoscopic Rockall Score. Results: Regarding re-bleeding prediction, (AUC for GBS= 0.573, RS 0.534). As for mortality prediction, GBS was similar to RS (AUC 0.754 and 0.744 respectively). Regarding need for blood transfusion (AUC for GBS= 0.868 and 0.691 for RS), prediction of need for endoscopic intervention revealed that GBS was superior to RS (AUC 0.785 and 0.675 respectively). In terms of length of hospital stay, GBS and RS were quietly equivalent (AUC 0.654 and 0.657 respectively). Conclusion: The study concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between the Glasgow Blatchford Score and pre-endoscopic Rockall Score in predicting accuracy of clinical outcomes for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Recommendations: It is recommended that the pre-endoscopic Glasgow Blatchford Score and Rockall Score are considered useful tools that can be safely used to predict clinical outcomes of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.

Keywords:
gastrointestinal bleeding Glasgow Blatchford score patients' outcomes prediction Rockall score

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Fouad, T.R., Abdelsameea, E., Abdel-Razek, W., Attia, A, Mohamed, A., Metwally, K., Naguib, M. and Waked, I., Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Egyptian patients with cirrhosis: post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 34(9): 1604-1610. Sep. 2019.
 
[2]  Jiménez-Rosales, R., Valverde-López, F., Vadillo-Calles, F., Martínez-Cara, J. G., López de Hierro, M. and Redondo-Cerezo, E. In hospital and delayed mortality after upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an analysis of risk factors in a prospective series. Scandinavian. Journal of gastroenterology, 53(6), 714-720.‏ 2018.
 
[3]  DiGregorio, A.M. and Alvey, H. Gastrointestinal Bleeding. [Updated 2020 Aug 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537291/.2020.
 
[4]  Kumar, A., Kasturi, U., Singh, A. and Kaur, D. Endoscopic profile and clinical outcome of patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, International Journal of Advances in Medicine. 7(9): 1355-1360. Sep. 2020.
 
[5]  Saleem, S., Kudaravalli, P., Riaz, S., et al. Outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding based on time to endoscopy: a retrospective study. Cureus. 12(3): e7325. March. 2020.
 
[6]  Stanley, A.J., Laine, L., Dalton, H.R., Ngu, J.H., Schultz, M., Abazi, R., Zakko, L., Thornton, S., Wilkinson, K., Khor, J.L.C., Murray, I.A. and Laursen, S.B. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 356: i6432. 2017.
 
[7]  LeMone, P., Burke, K., and Bauldoff, G., Medical- Surgical Nursing: Critical Thinking in Patient Care, Pearson, Boston, 5th ed., 2017, 630-633.
 
[8]  Chatten, K., Purssell, H., Banerjee, A.K., Soteriadou, S. and Ang, Y. Glasgow blatchford score and risk stratifi cations in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed: can we extend this to 2 for urgent outpatient management? Clinical Medicine. Vol. 18 (2), 118-22. 2018.
 
[9]  El-Mohr, M.A.A, Afify, A.M. and Abd El-Aziz, A. SH. Risk stratification of acute upper GI bleeding by rockall, Glasgow Blatchford and AIMS 65 scores. Al-Azhar Med. J. (Medicine). Vol. 49(4). 1905-1918. October. 2020.
 
[10]  Oleske, D.M. and Islam, S.S., Role of epidemiology in the biopharmaceutical industry in pharmacovigilance: a practical approach, Elsevier, 2019, 69-87.
 
[11]  Liu, Y., Avant, K.C., Aungsuroch, Y., Zhanga, X. and Jiang, P., Patient outcomes in the field of nursing: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. Volume 1, Issue 1, 69-74. March 2014.
 
[12]  Ranganathan, P. and Aggarwal, R., Study designs: part 1 – an overview and classification. Perspect Clin Res. 9(4). 184-186. Oct-Dec. 2018.
 
[13]  Blatchford, O., Murray, W.R. and Blatchford, M., A risk scores to predict need for treatment for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 356 (9238):1318-21. 2000.
 
[14]  Rockall, T., Logan, R., Devlin, H., et al. Risk Assessment after Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Gut. 38, 16-21. 1996.
 
[15]  Weledji, E.P., Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a review. Surgery in Practice and Science, 100004. 1-7. 2020.
 
[16]  Leiman, D.A., Mills, A.M., Shofer, F.S., Weber, A.T., Leiman, E.R., Riff, B.P., et al. Glasgow blatchford score of limited benefit for low-risk urban patients: a mixed methods study. Endosc Int Open. 5(10): E950-e8. 2017.
 
[17]  Chang, A., Ouejiaraphant, C., Akarapatima, K., Rattanasupa, A., and Prachayakul, V. Prospective comparison of the AIMS65 score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinical Endoscopy, 54(2), 211. Mar. 2021.
 
[18]  Tsui, A.T.S., Chau, C. W. and Leung, J.K.S. Validation of a modified glasgow-blatchford score for risk stratification of patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 23(2). 1-9. Mar. 2016.
 
[19]  Lu, M., Sun, G., Huang, H., Zhang, X., Xu, Y., Chen, S., ... and Yang, Y. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scores for prediction of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in Chinese patients. Medicine, 98(21).‏ 2019.
 
[20]  Farag, A.R., Jouda, A.A., Moustafa, E.A. and Shawky, J.A. Non-variceal causes and outcome of acute upper gastro-intestinal bleeding among cirrhotic patients in tropical medicine intensive care unit, Afro-Egypt J Infect Endem Dis, 9(4).270-279. 2019.
 
[21]  Custovic, N., Husic-Selimovic, A., Srsen, N., and Prohic, D. Comparison of glasgow-blatchford score and rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Medical Archives, 74(4), 270. 2020.
 
[22]  Hafez, M.Z., Kassem, S.A. and Abd-Allah, M.A.H. Assessment of the causes and outcomes of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding patients in Aswan university hospital. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. Vol. 74 (6), 1359-1364. January. 2019.
 
[23]  Shafaghi, A., Gharibpoor, F., Mahdipour, Z. and Samadani, A. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin. ROM. J. INTERN. MED., 57, 4, 322-333. 2019.
 
[24]  Shahrami, A., Ahmadi, S., and Safari, S. Full and modified glasgow-blatchford bleeding score in predicting the outcome of patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding; a diagnostic accuracy study. Emergency, 6(1). ‏2018.
 
[25]  Fouad, T.A. and Shabaan, E.S. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-blatchford, and pre-endoscopy rockall scoring systems for risk stratification in Egyptian patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Med Sci Res; 3: 270-8. 2020.
 
[26]  Martínez-Cara, J.G., Jiménez-Rosales, R., Úbeda-Muñoz, M., de Hierro, M.L., de Teresa, J., and Redondo-Cerezo, E. Comparison of AIMS65, glasgow–blatchford score, and rockall score in a european series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality. United European gastroenterology journal, 4(3). 371-379. 2016.
 
[27]  Kim, M.S., Choi, J. and Shin, W.C. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to glasgow-blatchford score or rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. BMC gastroenterology. 19(1). 1-8. 2019.
 
[28]  Tang, Y., Shen, J., Zhang, F., Zhou, X., Tang, Z. and You, T. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED. The American journal of emergency medicine. 36(1). 27-32. 2018.
 
[29]  Saffouri, E., Blackwell, C., Laursen, S., Laine, L., Dalton, H. R., Ngu, J., Shultz, M., Norton, R. and Stanley, J.A. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 51: 253-260. 2020.
 
[30]  Kalkan, C., Soykan, I., Karakaya, F., Tuzun, A. and Gencturk, Z.B. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 17(4). 575-83. 2017.
 
[31]  Balaban, D.V., Strambu, V., Florea, B.G., Cazan, A.R., Bratucu, M. and Jinga, M. Predictors for in-hospital mortality and need for clinical intervention in upper GI bleeding: a 5-year observational study. Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania: 1990). 109(1): 48-54. 2014.
 
[32]  Mokhtare, M., Bozorgi, V., Agah, Sh., Nikkhah, M., Faghihi, A., Boghratian, A., Shalbaf, N., Khanlari, A. and Seifmanesh, H. Comparison of glasgow-blatchford score and full rockall score systems to predict clinical outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology. 9 337-343. October. 2016.