American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine
ISSN (Print): 2327-6681 ISSN (Online): 2327-6657 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajmsm Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine. 2014, 2(5), 109-114
DOI: 10.12691/ajmsm-2-5-5
Open AccessArticle

Development and Characterization of Buccal Bilayer Tablets containing Microparticles with Ibuprofen

J. Conceição1, , M. Estanqueiro1, M. H. Amaral1, P. Lobão1, P. Costa1 and J. M. Sousa Lobo1

1Research Centre for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Department of Drug Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Pub. Date: November 04, 2014

Cite this paper:
J. Conceição, M. Estanqueiro, M. H. Amaral, P. Lobão, P. Costa and J. M. Sousa Lobo. Development and Characterization of Buccal Bilayer Tablets containing Microparticles with Ibuprofen. American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine. 2014; 2(5):109-114. doi: 10.12691/ajmsm-2-5-5

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and characterize buccal bilayer tablets containing ibuprofen microparticles, prepared through emulsion/chilling method, to obtain a sustained release. In this way, three formulations of bilayer tablets containing three bioadhesive polymers, namely Noveon® AA-1 Polycarbophil USP, Carbopol® 974 and Carbopol® 980 were prepared. Weight uniformity, friability, hardness and in vitro drug release studies, by two different methods, were evaluated in the manufactured tablets. The calculation of similarity factor (f2) was also carried out. In addition, three gels (0.5%, w/w) with the same polymers were prepared and textural analysis (firmness and adhesiveness) were assessed in comparison with the bioadhesive layer of tablets. Buccal bilayer tablets with suitable physical properties (weight uniformity, hardness and friability) were produced. In vitro dissolution tests, performed during 8 hours, have demonstrated a sustained release of ibuprofen (maximum drug released: 30.0 - 45.1%). According to f2, both dissolution methods and the three studied polymers showed similar dissolution profiles (f2 > 50). Tablets containing Carbopol® 974 showed higher values of firmness and adhesiveness after 6 h of hydration in phosphate buffer pH 7.4. On the other hand, it was not possible to verify a relationship between the textural parameters of the gels and the bioadhesive layer of tablets containing the same polymers.

Keywords:
Buccal Bilayer Tablets Bioadhesive Polymers Microparticles Ibuprofen Sustained Release

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Kottala, N., et al., “Influence of compaction properties and interfacial topography on the performance of bilayer tablets”, Int J Pharm, 436 (1-2). 171-8. 2012.
 
[2]  Abebe, A., et al., “Review of bilayer tablet technology”, Int J Pharm, 461 (1-2). 549-58. 2014.
 
[3]  Kanjanabat, S., Pongjanyakul, T., “Preparation and characterization of nicotine-magnesium aluminum silicate complex-loaded sodium alginate matrix tablets for buccal delivery”, AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, 12 (2). 683-92. 2011.
 
[4]  Sudhakar, Y., Kuotsu, K., Bandyopadhyay, A.K., “Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery-a promising option for orally less efficient drugs”, J Control Release, 114 (1). 15-40. 2006.
 
[5]  Salamat-Miller, N., Chittchang, M., Johnston, T.P., “The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery”, Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 57 (11). 1666-91. 2005.
 
[6]  Bremecker, K.D., Strempel, H., Klein, G., “Novel concept for a mucosal adhesive ointment”, J Pharm Sci, 73 (4). 548-52. 1984.
 
[7]  Nair, M.K., Chien, Y.W., “Development of anticandidal delivery systems: (II) mucoadhesive devices for prolonged drug delivery in the oral cavity”, Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 22 (3). 243-53. 1996.
 
[8]  Kohda, Y., et al., “Controlled release of lidocaine hydrochloride from buccal mucosa-adhesive films with solid dispersion”, Int J Pharm, 158 (2). 147-55. 1997.
 
[9]  Rossi, S., et al., “Buccal delivery of acyclovir from films based on chitosan and polyacrylic acid”, Pharm Dev Technol, 8 (2). 199-208. 2003.
 
[10]  Ali, J., Khar, R.K., Ahuja, A., “Formulation and characterization of a buccoadhesive erodible tablet for the treatment oforal lesions”, Pharmazie, 53 (5). 329-34. 1998.
 
[11]  Perioli, L., Pagano, C., “Preformulation studies of mucoadhesive tablets for carbamazepine sublingual administration”, Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 102. 915-22. 2013.
 
[12]  Shin, S.C., Bum, J.P., Choi, J.S., “Enhanced bioavailability by buccal administration of triamcinolone acetonide from the bioadhesive gels in rabbits”, Int J Pharm, 209 (1-2). 37-43. 2000.
 
[13]  Jones, D.S., et al., “Physicochemical characterization and preliminary in vivo efficacy of bioadhesive, semisolid formulations containing flurbiprofen for the treatment of gingivitis”, J Pharm Sci, 88 (6). 592-8. 1999.
 
[14]  Batchelor, H., Novel bioadhesive formulations in drug delivery, The Drug Delivery Companies Report Autumn/Winter, Pharma Ventures Ltd., 2004.
 
[15]  Mishra, P.R., et al., “Hydrogels as drug delivery system”, Indian Drugs, 33 (5). 181-6. 1996.
 
[16]  Ravi Kumar, M.N., “Nano and microparticles as controlled drug delivery devices”, J Pharm Pharm Sci, 3 (2). 234-58. 2000.
 
[17]  Almeida, H., Amaral, M.H., Lobão, P., “Comparative study of sustained-release lipid microparticles and solid dispersions containing ibuprofen”, Braz J Pharm Sci, 48 (3). 529-36. 2012.
 
[18]  Mahajan, H.S., Gattani, S.G., “Gellan gum based microparticles of metoclopromide hydrochloride for intranasal delivery: development and evaluation”, Chem Pharm Bull, 57 (4). 388-92. 2009.
 
[19]  Freitas, S., Merkle, H.P., Gander, B., “Microencapsulation by solvent extraction/evaporation: reviewing the state of the art of microsphere preparation process technology”, J Control Release, 102 (2). 313-32. 2005.
 
[20]  Kang, Y., et al., “Preparation of PLLA/PLGA microparticles using solution enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluids (SEDS)”, J Colloid Interface Sci, 322 (1). 87-94. 2008.
 
[21]  Gouin, S., “Microencapsulation: industrial appraisal of existing technologies and trends”, Trends Food Sci Technol, 15 (7-8). 330-47. 2004.
 
[22]  Vezzù, K., et al., “Production of lipid microparticles containing bioactive molecules functionalized with PEG”, J Supercrit Fluids, 54 (3). 328-334. 2010.
 
[23]  Chambi, H.N.M., et al., “Solid lipid microparticles containing water-soluble compounds of different molecular mass: Production, characterisation and release profiles”, Food Res Int, 41 (3). 229-236. 2008.
 
[24]  Müller, R.H., Mäder, K., Gohla, S., “Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery-a review of the state of the art”, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 50 (1). 161-77. 2000.
 
[25]  Soppimath, K.S., Kulkarni, A.R., Aminabhavi, T.M., “Encapsulation of antihypertensive drugs in cellulose-based matrix microspheres: characterization and release kinetics of microspheres and tableted microspheres”, J Microencapsul, 18 (3). 397-409. 2001..
 
[26]  Sogias, I.A., Williams, A.C., Khutoryanskiy, V., “Chitosan-based mucoadhesive tablets for oral delivery of ibuprofen”, Int J Pharm, 436 (1-2). 602-10. 2012.
 
[27]  Lopes, C.M., et al., “Compressed matrix core tablet as a quick/slow dual-component delivery system containing ibuprofen”, AAPS Pharm Sci Tech, 8 (3). E76. 2007.
 
[28]  De Brabander, C., et al., “Bioavailability of ibuprofen from matrix mini-tablets based on a mixture of starch and microcrystalline wax”, Int J Pharm, 208 (1-2). 81-6. 2000.
 
[29]  European Pharmacopoeia, 8th ed., EDQM, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 2014.
 
[30]  Miyazaki, S., et al., “Oral mucosal bioadhesive tablets of pectin and HPMC: in vitro and in vivo evaluation”, Int J Pharm, 204 (1-2), 127-32. 2000.
 
[31]  Remuñán-López, C., et al., “Design and evaluation of chitosan/ethylcellulose mucoadhesive bilayered devices for buccal drug delivery”, J Control Release, 55 (2-3). 143-52. 1998.
 
[32]  Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence, Committee for medicinal products for human use (CHMP), European Medicines Agency (EMA), London, 2010.
 
[33]  Moore, J.W., Flanner, H.H., “Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles”, Pharm Tech, 20 (6). 64-74. 1996.
 
[34]  Bourne, M.C., “Texture profile analysis”, Food Technol, 32. 62-72. 1978.
 
[35]  Ofokansi, K.C., et al., “Formulation and evaluation of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked chitosan microparticles for the delivery of ibuprofen”, Trop J Pharm Res, 12 (1). 19-25. 2013.
 
[36]  Zhang, L., et al., “The effects of cryoprotectants on the freeze-drying of ibuprofen-loaded solid lipid microparticles (SLM)”, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 69 (2). 750-9. 2008.
 
[37]  Perge, L., et al., “New solid lipid microparticles for controlled ibuprofen release: formulation and characterization study”, Int J Pharm, 422 (1-2). 59-67. 2012.
 
[38]  Wikarsa, S., et al., “The improvement of ibuprofen dissolution rate through microparticles spray drying processed in an aqueous system”, Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 34 (5). 485-91. 2008.
 
[39]  Conceição, J., et al., “Development and characterization of mucoadhesive bilayer tablets”, in 9th World Meeting on Pharmaceutics, Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Lisbon, Portugal. 2014.
 
[40]  Conceição, J., et al., “Development and characterization of buccal bilayer tablets containing microparticles of ibuprofen”, in Xth Spanish-Portuguese Conference on Controlled Drug Delivery (SPLC-CRS 2013), Valencia, Spain. 2013.
 
[41]  Woertz, C., et al., “Assessment of test methods evaluating mucoadhesive polymers and dosage forms: An overview”, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 85 (3). 843-53. 2013.