Prediction Models by Response Surface Methodology for Turning Operation

Basim A. Khidhir^1, , Waleed Al- Oqaiel² and PshtwanMuhammed Kareem³

¹Slemani Technical College, Iraq

²Ministry of Industry, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

³Slemani technical Institute, Iraq

Cite this paper:
Basim A. Khidhir, Waleed Al- Oqaiel and PshtwanMuhammed Kareem. Prediction Models by Response Surface Methodology for Turning Operation. American Journal of Modeling and Optimization. 2015; 3(1):1-6. doi: 10.12691/ajmo-3-1-1

Abstract

This study is intended to develop a predictive model for surface roughness and temperature in turning operation of AISI 1020 mild steel using cemented carbide in a dry condition using the Response Surface Method (RSM). The values of the selected cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut are based on the preliminary trial experiments by design of experiments. The analysis of variance for the predictive model of second order for both models shows that the feed rate is the most significant parameter which affects the surface roughness and temperature followed by cutting speed. The goal is to monitor one response by other instead of using different techniques. Both models are convenient for predicting of the main effects of the machining parameters and are economical for determining the influence of various parameters in a systematic manner.

Keywords:
response surface methodology machining parameters surface roughness AISI 1020 mild steel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	T.V. SreeramaReddya, T. Sornakumarb, M. VenkataramaReddya, R. Venkatramc, Machinability of C45 steel with deep cryogenic treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts, Int. Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 27 (2009) 181-185.
[2]	K. V. Sudhakar, J. C. Cisneros, Hector Cervantes and Cosme Gomez Pineda Machining characteristics and fracture morphologies in a copper-beryllium (Cu-2Be) alloy, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Volume 15, Number 1, 117-121, (2006).
[3]	Metal cutting theory and practice by David a. Stephenson and John S.Agapiou, publish by Marcel Dekker, Inc, 1997.
[4]	Metal Cutting Mechanics by Viktor P. Astakhov, publish by CRC press, 1999.
[5]	Manufacturing Process and Systems, Ninth Edition; by Philip F. Ostwald and Jairo Munoz, publish by John Wiley & Sons
[6]	E.M. Trent, Metal Cutting, 3rd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
[7]	WuyiChen, “Cutting forces and surface finish when machining medium hardness steel using CBN tools”, International Journal of Machine tools and Manufacture, 40 (2000), pp 455-466
[8]	Design and analysis of Experiments, fifth edition; by Douglas C.Montgomery; publish by John Wiley and Sons
[9]	Response Surfaces design and analyses second edition; by Andre I.Khuri and John A. Cornell, publish by Marcel Dekker, Inc
[10]	M. Hasegawa, A. Seireg, R.A. Lindberg, “Surface roughness model for turning”, Tribology International, December (1976), pp 285-289.
[11]	G.E.P. Box, N.R. Draper, “Empirical model-building and response surfaces”, New York, John Wiley & Sons, (1987).
[12]	M.A. El Baradie, “Surface roughness model for turning grey cast iron (154BHN)”, Proceeding of Institution of Mechanical Engg, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 207 (1993), pp 43-54.
[13]	R.M. Sundaram, B.K. Lambert,” Mathematical models to predict surface finish in fine turning of steel”, Part I, International Journal of Production Research, 19 (1981), pp 547-556
[14]	R. Mead, D.J. Pike, “A review of response surface methodology from a biometric viewpoint”, Biometrics, 31 (1975), pp 803-851
[15]	W. J. Hill, W.G. Hunter,” A review of response surface methodology: a literature survey”, Technometrics, 8 (1966), pp 571-590
[16]	W.J. Hill, W.G. Hunter, “A review of response surface methodology: a literature survey”, Technometrics, 8 (1966), pp 571-590
[17]	M. Alauddin, M.A.EL Baradie, M.S.J.Hashmi, “Prediction of tool life in end milling by response surface methodology”, 71(1997), pp 456-465.
[18]	Mishra, T. Prasad, “Residual stresses due to a moving heat source”, lnt. J. Mech. Sci., 27(9) (1985), pp 571-581.
[19]	M.E. E1-Khabeery, M. Fattouh,” Residual stress distribution caused by milling”, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., 29 (3) (1989), pp 391 401
[20]	W. Wu, Y. Matsumoto, “The effect of hardness on residual stresses in orthogonal machining of AISI 4340 steel”, ME J. Eng. Ind., 112 (1990), pp 252.
[21]	Y. Matsumoto, M.M. Barash, C.R. Liu, “Effect of hardness on the surface integrity of AISI 4340 steel”, SME J. Eng. Ind., 108 (1986), pp 69-175.
[22]	S.M. Wu, “Tool life testing by response surface methodology”, part i and part ii, Trans. ASME B, 86 (1964), pp 105-116.
[23]	O.W. Reen,” Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy”, MPIF Publishers, 10 (1977), pp. 431-451.
[24]	M.C. Shaw, Metal Cutting Principles, Oxford University Press, New York, 1986.
[25]	K. Taraman, “Multi machining output ± Multi independent variable research by response surface methodology”, Int. J. Prod. Res, 13 (4) (1975), pp 265-290.
[26]	M. Hasegawa, A. Seireg, R.A. Lindberg, “Surface roughness model”, Tribology International, 1976, pp 285-289
[27]	R.M. Sundaram, B.K. Lambert,” Mathematical models to predict surface finish in steel”, Part I, International Journal of Production Research, 19 (1981), pp 547-556.
[28]	Mital,M. Mehta, “Surface roughness prediction models”, International Journal of Production Research, 26 (1988), pp 1861-1876.
[29]	G. Boothroyd, Fundamentals of Metal Machining and Machine Tools, McGraw Hill Publishers, 1975.
[30]	M.A. El Baradie, “Surface roughness model for grey cast iron (154BHN)”, Proceeding of Institution of Mechanical Engg, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 207 (1993), pp 43-54.