Analysis and Improvement of Material Selection for Process Piping System in Offshore Industry

Karan Sotoodeh^1,

¹Piping Engineering, Aker Solutions, Oslo, Norway

Cite this paper:
Karan Sotoodeh. Analysis and Improvement of Material Selection for Process Piping System in Offshore Industry. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2018; 6(1):17-26. doi: 10.12691/ajme-6-1-3

Abstract

Material failure mainly because of corrosion is a highly dangerous and expensive phenomenon in the offshore sector of the oil and gas industry, associated with severe negative consequences such as loss of asset, loss of production due to plant shutdown, loss of human life, and health, safety, and environment (HSE) problems (e.g. environmental pollution). Additionally, piping systems are produced in large numbers for the topside facilities in the oil and gas plants. Thus, the main aim of this paper is to introduce a novel approach for the piping material selection in the offshore industry to minimize the risk of piping corrosion and weight reduction with an optimum cost. The central focus of the study is to develop a material selection tool based on a systematic material selection approach and the existing literature, standards, and specifications. In this study, the optimal material selection strategy includes three well-known methods of screening: Cambridge material selector, value engineering (VE), and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The proposed guideline is a practical reference for material and piping engineers in the offshore industry to select the best choice of material for a specific application. The main finding of this research is that 25% chromium super duplex stainless steel is the best choice of material for processing piping systems in offshore plants for non-sour process (hydrocarbon) services. Super duplex stainless steel provides a high corrosion resistance and mechanical strength with the advantage of weight reduction for the selected facilities. A method of piping cost analysis is introduced to validate super duplex stainless steel as the most economical option.

Keywords:
offshore piping corrosion material selection

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	KERMANI M.B., HARROP D. (1996). The impact of corrosion on Oil and Gas Industry. Surrey, UK: SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS (SPE).
[2]	KERMANI M.B., MRSHED A. (2003). Carbon Dioxide Corrosion in Oil and Gas Production- A Compendium. Surrey, UK: KEY TECH LIMITED.
[3]	ZHENG Y., BROWN B., NESIC S. (2014). Electrochemical Study and Modeling of H2S Corrosion of Mild Steel. Corrosion the Journal of Science and Engineering. Volume 70, No. 4, pp 351-365.
[4]	DUGSTAD A., (2006). Fundamental Aspects of CO2 Metal Loss Corrosion Part I. Corrosion NACE Expo2006. Paper No. 06111.
[5]	ASHBEY MF., (2005). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. 3rd edition. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
[6]	FARAG M., (1997). Materials selection for engineering design. Prentice-Hall; p.227-34.
[7]	STEWART RB., (2005). Fundamentals of value methodology. Philadelphia: Xlibris.
[8]	HWANG CL, YOON K., (1981).Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer.
[9]	SMITH P., (2005). Piping Material Guide. 5th edition, Oxford: ELSEVIER.
[10]	PERRY R.H. (1999). Perrys Chemical Engineers Handbook. McGraw-Hill
[11]	NORSOK M-001, (2014). Material Selection. 5th edition, Lysaker, Norway.
[12]	NORSOK L-001, (2017). Piping and Valves. 4th revision, Oslo, Norway.
[13]	NORSOK P-001, (2001). Process Systems. 2nd revision, Oslo, Norway.
[14]	NORSOK M-506, (2005). CO2 Corrosion Rate Calculation Model. 2nd revision, Oslo, Norway.
[15]	AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ASME), (2012). Process Piping. New York, NY.
[16]	NATIONAL ASSOSIATION OF CORROSION ENGINEERS (NACE) MR0175-ISO15156, (2015). Petroleum and natural gas industries-Materials for use in H2S containing environments in oil and gas production. Houston, Texas.
[17]	AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TEST AND MATERIALS (ASTM) ASTM G48, (2015). Standard Test Methods for Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Related Alloys by Use of Ferric Chloride Solution. USA.
[18]	NUSTAD G., (2015). Tackling Corrosive Challenges in the Oil and Gas Industry. Valve World, 20(11), pp.56-60.
[19]	AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ASME), (2004). Carbon, alloy and stainless steel pipes. ASME B36.10/19.
[20]	OLE GJERP J. (2015). Material Selection for Offshore Piping Systems-Cost Aspects, Aker Solutions, Norway, Oslo.