Plant Layout Factor Impact to Attaining Optimal Approach in facility Layout Design in Plywood Industry

Mathew Shadrack Uzoma^1, and Eseonu Obi¹

¹Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Cite this paper:
Mathew Shadrack Uzoma and Eseonu Obi. Plant Layout Factor Impact to Attaining Optimal Approach in facility Layout Design in Plywood Industry. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2023; 11(3):115-123. doi: 10.12691/ajme-11-3-3

Abstract

The research focus is redesigning the facility layout of Piedmont Plywood Industry, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. Optimal approach to productivity and cost to yielding in facility layout design modifications is the trend in this research work. The facility layout modification central idea is the plant layout factor. Plant layout factor deals path modification. That is arrangement of machine, equipment and work stations as close as possible for optimal utilization of available space in the work environment. The productivity index for the current layout or the existing layout is 0.000275m3/Naira. The Alternative 1 modification productivity index is 0.000289m3/Naira and that of Alternative 2 modification is 0.000296m3/Naira. This is an indication of higher rate of return on investment for the two alternative layout modifications. It is interesting to note that the results of the productivity index impacts positively on labor and capital cost of investment in such manner that there is tremendous cut back. The Alternative 1 modification resulted in total cost savings of N1,015,411.00/month while that of Alternative 2 is N1,436,545.00/month. These constitutes tremendous cut back on investments when accumulated over years. The Piedmont Plywood Product Industry and other wood product industries are strongly advised to inject the findings of the alternative layout modifications in the existing factory layout designs.

Keywords:
productivity index current layout alternative layout modification higher rate of return on investment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Fuller, B. (2009). A record year for the global forest products industry?. Available http://www.lignumamerica.com/en/main/get/467.
[2]	Spelter, H., McKeever, D., Alderman M. (2006). ‘Status and Trends: Profile of Structural Panels in the United States and Canada. Research Note FPL-RP-636’. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 1 (1).
[3]	Apple, J. M. (1977). Plant Layout and Material Handling. (3rd Edition). New York: John Wiley &Sons.
[4]	Sarin, S. C., Loharjun P., Malmborg, C. J., Krishnakumar, B. (1992). ‘A Multi attribute Decision-Theoretic Approach for the Layout Design Problem’. European Journal of Operational Research. 57 (1), pp. 231-242.
[5]	Drira, A., Pierreval, H., Hajri-Gabouj, S. (2007). ‘Facility Layout Problems: a Survey’. AnnualReviews in Control. 31 (1), Edward B. Mueller Company. Available at: http://www.muellerco.com/mueller_industrial_equipment_panel_stackers.asp. Last accessed 23 Sep 2009.
[6]	Tompkins, J. A., White, J. A., Bozer, Y. A., Tanchoco, J. M. A. (2003). Facilities Planning. (3rd Edition). Hoboken, N. J.: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.
[7]	Heizer, J., Render, B. (2008). Operations Management. (9th Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[8]	Frazelle, E. H. (1986). ‘Material Handling: A Technology for Industrial Competitiveness’. Material Handling Research Center Technical Report. Georgia Institute of Technology.
[9]	Meyers, F. E., Stephens, M.P. (2005). Manufacturing Facilities Design and Material Handling. (3rd Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[10]	Sule, D. R. (2009). Manufacturing Facilities: Location, Planning, and Design. (3rd Edition). BocaRaton, FL: CRC Press.
[11]	http://www.muellerco.com/mueller_industrial_equipment_panel_stackers.asp. Last accessed 23 Sep 2009.
[12]	Eisenhardt, K. (1989). ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’. Academy of ManagementReview. 14 (4), Erdogmus, H., Favaro, J., Strigel, W. (2004). ‘Return on Investment’. IEEE Software. 1 (1).