American Journal of Mechanical Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2328-4102 ISSN (Online): 2328-4110 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajme Editor-in-chief: Kambiz Ebrahimi, Dr. SRINIVASA VENKATESHAPPA CHIKKOL
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2019, 7(1), 35-40
DOI: 10.12691/ajme-7-1-4
Open AccessArticle

Hydrodynamic Characteristics of the Propeller-Rudder Interaction by RANS Solver

Seyed Morteza Javadpour1, Ali Eskafi Noghani2, Hassan Ghassemi2, and David Molyneux3

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Gonabad, Iran

2Department of Maritime Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

3Department of Ocean and Naval Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada

Pub. Date: February 26, 2019

Cite this paper:
Seyed Morteza Javadpour, Ali Eskafi Noghani, Hassan Ghassemi and David Molyneux. Hydrodynamic Characteristics of the Propeller-Rudder Interaction by RANS Solver. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2019; 7(1):35-40. doi: 10.12691/ajme-7-1-4

Abstract

This paper is presented the interaction between propeller and rudder at different operating conditions by using ANSYS-Fluent software. A moving reference frame (MRF) method is applied and the flow equations are solved using Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) method and the K-ω SST turbulent model. The propeller is selected VP1304 and rudder is spade type with NACA0015 section. Hydrodynamic characteristics of the propeller with and without rudder, effect of rudder on the propeller performance, rudder lift and drag, pressure and velocity contour are presented discussed. The results show that the rudder effect on the propeller is small while the propeller on the lift and drag of the rudder may be significant.

Keywords:
propeller VP1304 spade rudder hydrodynamic characteristics lift and drag coefficients

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 12

References:

[1]  Kim, H.T. and Stern, F. Viscous flow around a propeller-shaft configuration with infinite pitch rectangular blades, J of Propulsion and Power, 6(4), 1990, 434-444.
 
[2]  Stanier, M.J. Investigation into propeller skew using a ‘RANS’ code. Part 1: Model scale. International Shipbuilding Progress, 45(443), 1998, 237-251.
 
[3]  Stanier, M.J. Investigation into propeller skew using a ‘RANS’ code. Part 2: Scale effects. Int Shipbuilding Progress, 45(443), 1998, 253-265.
 
[4]  Molland, A. Turnock, S.R. Marine Rudders and Control Surfaces. 1st Ed, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007.
 
[5]  Hakan Ozdemira Y, Bayraktara S., Yılmaza T., Flow field analysis of a rudder by using computational fluid dynamics. 5th Int Adv Tech Symp (IATS’09), May 13-15, Karabuk, Turkey, 2009.
 
[6]  Young Y.L, Brizzolara S, Numerical and physical investigation of a surface-piercing hydrofoil. Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors SMP’13, Tasmania, Australia, 2013.
 
[7]  Ueno M, Tsukada Y, Kitagawa Y, Rudder effectiveness correction for scale model ship testing. NMRI, Tokyo 181-0004 Japan, 2012.
 
[8]  Krasilnikov V, Ponkratov D, Crepier P, A Numerical study on the characteristics of the system propeller and rudder at low speed operation, 2nd SMP’11, Hamburg, Germany, June 2011.
 
[9]  Mascio A.D, Dubbioso G, Muscari R, Felli M., CFD analysis of propeller-rudder interaction, Proc 25th Int Ocean and Polar Eng Conf, Hawaii, USA, June 21-26, 2015, 946-950, 2015.
 
[10]  Muscaria R., Dubbiosoa G., Vivianib M., Mascioc A.D., Analysis of the asymmetric behavior of propeller–rudder system of twin screw ships by CFD, 143(1), 2017, 269-281.
 
[11]  He L., Kinnas S.A., Numerical simulation of unsteady propeller/rudder interaction, Int J of Na Arch and Oc Eng, 9(6), 2017, 677-692.
 
[12]  Ghassemi H., Ghadimi P., Computational hydrodynamic analysis of the propeller–rudder and the AZIPOD systems, Ocean Eng 35(1), 2008, 117-130.
 
[13]  Ghassemi H., Iranmanesh M, Comparison of hydrodynamic characteristics on two ship propulsors (PRS And Azipod), Iranian J. of Sci Tech 32(4), 2008.
 
[14]  Ghassemi, H., Allafchi F., A new implementation of vortex lattice method applied to the hydrodynamic performance of the propeller-rudder, J Ocean, Mech and Aerospace, 16, 2015.
 
[15]  Ghassemi H., Zakerdoost H., Ship hull–propeller system optimization based on the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, Proc of the Ins Mech Engineers, Part C: J. Mech Eng Sci, 231(1), 2017, 175-192.
 
[16]  Zakerdoost H., Ghassemi H., Hydrodynamic multidisciplinary optimization of a container ship and its propeller using comprehensive HPSOP code, Scientific J Maritime Univ of Szczecin, 2018, 53(125), 48-56.
 
[17]  Zakerdoost H., Ghassemi H., A multi-level optimization technique based on fuel consumption and energy index in early-stage ship design, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1-22.
 
[18]  Zakerdoost H., Ghassemi H., Hydrodynamic multidisciplinary optimization of a container ship and its propeller using comprehensive HPSOP code, Scientific J Maritime Univ of Szczecin, 2018, 53(125), 48-56.