American Journal of Medical Case Reports
ISSN (Print): 2374-2151 ISSN (Online): 2374-216X Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajmcr Editor-in-chief: Apply for this position
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2024, 12(7), 103-109
DOI: 10.12691/ajmcr-12-7-4
Open AccessReview Article

Technical Considerations Associated with Mechanical and Chemical Retentive Aids in Maxillofacial Prosthodontic Rehabilitation: A Review

Shabir A Shah1, Nadeem Yunus2, Nishant Gaba3 and Noopur Rathi4,

1Department of Prosthodontics, Government dental college and hospital, University of Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, India

2Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of dentistry, Jamia Millia Institute, JMIU, New Delhi, India

3Department of Maxillofacial prosthodontics, Inderprastha Dental College & Hospital, CCSU, UP, India

4Department of Prosthodontics, DJ College of dental sciences, BRAU, Uttar Pradesh, India

Pub. Date: July 28, 2024

Cite this paper:
Shabir A Shah, Nadeem Yunus, Nishant Gaba and Noopur Rathi. Technical Considerations Associated with Mechanical and Chemical Retentive Aids in Maxillofacial Prosthodontic Rehabilitation: A Review. American Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2024; 12(7):103-109. doi: 10.12691/ajmcr-12-7-4

Abstract

Maxillofacial prosthesis (MFP) is a customised prosthesis; therefore, one requires a blend of multiple skills in individualising them for a specific patient. Retention of these prostheses largely depends on available hard and soft tissues, based on which the retention aids can be either mechanical or chemical. Most extraoral prostheses, irrespective of mechanical retention, cannot adhere to the skin for which chemical adhesives are used. While most of the published research focuses on materials, this review has been aimed at collecting evidence-based information on the technical aspects of both mechanical and chemical aids used to retain different types of MFP. Four medical databases were searched for relevant research articles using relevant terms in combination with Boolean operators. The search produced 137 research articles, and after careful evaluation of the articles, about 79 research articles fulfilled the criteria for this review. The technical considerations for the mechanical and chemical aids were further searched from relevant manufacturer catalogues. The review provides a comprehensive clinically oriented background of both in terms of clinical application.

Keywords:
oral cancers maxillofacial prosthesis maxillectomy hemi mandibulectomy maxillofacial implants

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Williams M, Evans PL, Abu-Serriah M. Modern maxillofacial rehabilitation. In Atlas of Extreme Facial Cancer: Challenges and Solutions 2022 (pp. 381-420). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
 
[2]  Farook TH, Jamayet NB, Abdullah JY, et al. Designing 3D prosthetic templates for maxillofacial defect rehabilitation: A comparative analysis of different virtual workflows. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020; 118:103646.
 
[3]  Gaudin R, Raguse JD, Krause S, et al. Quality of life and psychological evaluation of patients after anaplastology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2023; 51(7-8): 485-9.
 
[4]  Sindi AS, Kumar L, Verma A, et al. Prosthodontic rehabilitation’s role in alleviating anxiety and depression in mucormycosis-induced maxillectomy patients post-covid-19. Med. Sci. Monit. 2023; 29: e941488-1.
 
[5]  Kumar L, Verma A, Pal US, et al. Influence of prosthodontic rehabilitation using zygomatic implants in covid 19 related mucormycosis (rhino–orbital–cerebral) maxillectomy patients upon post-operative stress, anxiety and functional impairment: A prospective cohort study. Clin Interv Aging 2023: 1201-19.
 
[6]  Mattoo K, Singh M, Rahman S. Rehabilitation of disfigurement associated with maxillectomy by a cheek plumper prosthesis. Am. J. Med. Case Rep. 2014; 2(10): 200-203.
 
[7]  Nazar SA, Nair VV, Kumar H, et al. Retention in maxillofacial prosthetics: A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2021; 7: 568-73.
 
[8]  Choubisa D. A comprehensive review of extraoral maxillofacial material: Part I. J Dent Res Rev 2022; 9(2): 85-94.
 
[9]  Mattoo KA, Rahman S, Jain K. A need for medical-dental communication in acquired palatal perforation cases in developing nations. East African Scholars J Med Sci 2019; 2(12): 686-89
 
[10]  Lanzara R, Viswambaran M, Kumar D. Maxillofacial prosthetic materials: current status and recent advances: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 2021 Jun; 7(2): 255-9.
 
[11]  Shah KK, Rajaraman V, Veeraiyan DN, Maiti S. A systematic review on maxillofacial prosthesis with respect to their color stability. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants. 2024; 34.
 
[12]  Swift A, Liew S, Weinkle S, et al. The facial aging process from the “inside out”. Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41(10): 1107-19.
 
[13]  Rathi N, Rahman S, Mattoo K. Creating oral musculature balance in a mandibular complete denture. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2020; 4(7): 8-9.
 
[14]  Rahman SU, Mattoo KA, Qassadi TMH. Vestibuloplasty as an aid to enhance complete denture stability. JMSCR 2020; 8(4): 331-334
 
[15]  Suresh N, Janakiram C, Nayar S, et al. Effectiveness of digital data acquisition technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses–A systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022; 12(1): 208-15.
 
[16]  Darraj A, Mattoo KA, Nazish M. Scheduling multiple surgical procedures in immunocompromised rheumatoid patient on immune suppressant regimen. JMSCR. 2017; 5 (08): 26828-833.
 
[17]  Kumar L, Saloni, Rao J, et al. Finger prosthesis with an alternative approach. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 2012; 22 (01): 58-60.
 
[18]  Matapathi N, Shenoy VK, Shenoy R, et al. Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after prosthodontic rehabilitation: A cross-sectional study. J Canc Res Therapeut. 2022; 18(Suppl 2): S219-25.
 
[19]  De Caxias FP, Dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC, et al. Classification, history, and future prospects of maxillofacial prosthesis. Int J Dent. 2019; 2019(1):8657619.
 
[20]  Ge L, Chen S. Recent advances in tissue adhesives for clinical medicine. Polymers. 2020; 12(4): 939.
 
[21]  Yunus N, Goswami R, Mattoo K. Single maxillary complete denture against natural dentition–influence of the palatal vault of selection of a metal denture base. Am. J. Med. Case Rep. 2022; 10(10): 277-82.
 
[22]  McKinstry RE, Aramany MA, Beery QC, et al. Speech considerations in prosthodontic rehabilitation of the glossectomy patient. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53(3): 384-7.
 
[23]  Banerjee S, Kumar S, Bera A, et al. Magnet retained intraoral-extra oral combination prosthesis: a case report. J Advan Prosthod. 2012; 4(4): 235-8.
 
[24]  Kanathila H, Pangi A. The changing concepts in the retention of maxillofacial prosthesis from past to present--a review. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2017; 6(84): 5879-84.
 
[25]  Mattoo K, Jain K. Speech enhancing prosthesis for acquired cleft palate. JMSCR 2015; 3(2): 4396-99.
 
[26]  Klimczak J, Helman S, Kadakia S, et al. Prosthetics in facial reconstruction. Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. 2018; 11(1): 006-14.
 
[27]  Al Moaleem MM, Somaili DA, Ageeli TA, et al. Pattern of partial edentulism and its relation to age, gender, causes of teeth loss in Jazan population. Am J Heal Rese. 2016; 4: 121–26.
 
[28]  Al-Harbi FA, Ayad NM, Saber MA, et al. Mechanical behavior and color change of facial prosthetic elastomers after outdoor weathering in a hot and humid climate. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113(2): 146-51.
 
[29]  Singh M, Singh S, Kumar L, et al. Evaluation of retentive strength of 50 endodontically-treated single-rooted mandibular second premolars restored with cast post cores using 5 common luting (cement) agents. Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30: e944110-1.
 
[30]  Mittal N, Khosla A, Jain S, et al. Effect of storage media on the flexural strength of heat and self-cure denture base acrylic resins – an invitro study. Ann Rom Soc Cell Biol 2021; 25(4): 11743 – 11750.
 
[31]  Türksayar AD, Saglam SA, Bulut AC. Retention systems used in maxillofacial prostheses: a review. Nig J Clin Pract. 2019; 22(12): 1629-34.
 
[32]  Mantri S, Khan Z. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of acquired maxillofacial defects. Head and neck cancer. Intech. 2012:315-6.
 
[33]  Singh M, Mattoo K, Yadav L. Clinical variables associated with the rehabilitation of a hemimandibulectomy patient. Med. Res. Chronicles 2015; 2 (1): 14-18.
 
[34]  Reslan MR, Osman E, Segaan L, et al. Comparison between distal extension attachment-retained removable partial prostheses with integrated and conventional reciprocation designs: A clinical trial. JCDP. 2023; 24(2): 90.
 
[35]  Ageeli OE, Ibrahim RM, Aidhy FE, et al. Maxillary canine pier abutment management using fixed movable bridge design. Am J Med Case Rep. 2023; 11: 67-70.
 
[36]  Parr GR, Gardner LK. The evolution of the obturator framework design. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89(6): 608-10.
 
[37]  Yojiro Ota, Satoshi Ebihara, et al. A large maxillofacial prosthesis for total mandibular defect: a Case Report. Jap J Clin Onco. 1999 29(5): 256-260.
 
[38]  Wu Y, Liu C, Lapiere M, et al. Thermoplastic elastomers for wireless, skin‐interfaced electronic, and microfluidic devices. Adv Mat Tech 2023; 8(19): 2300732.
 
[39]  Awaja F, Gilbert M, Kelly G et al. Adhesion of polymers. Prog. Polymer Sci. 2009, 34, 948–968.
 
[40]  Peppas NA, Buri PA. Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues. J. Control. Release 1985, 2, 257–275.
 
[41]  Mattoo KA, Garg R. Evaluation of degree of thanatophobia associated with prosthetic rehabilitation of oral cancer patients. Am J Med Case Rep 2014; 2(12): 272-275.
 
[42]  Mattoo KA, Singh M, Singh V. Muco-Cutaneous keratoacanthoma involving maxillary lip. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Radiol, 2014; 2(2): 21-22.
 
[43]  Dings JP, Merkx MA, de Clonie Maclennan-Naphausen MT, et al. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey on the quality of life. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov 1; 120(5): 780-6.
 
[44]  Nemli SK, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, et al. Quality of life of patients with implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses: a prospective and retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109(1): 44-52.
 
[45]  Kurien A, Poundass M, et al. Nasal prosthesis with magnetically secured intranasal framework for a patient with partial rhinectomy and intraoral defects: a case report. J Clin Trans Res. 2020; 6(4): 190.
 
[46]  Kharade PP, Giri TK, Banerjee A, et al. Facial Prosthesis. In Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Head and Neck Cancer Patients 2024 Jan 1 (pp. 215-234). Elsevier.
 
[47]  Goel S, Singh SV, Singh N, et al. Spectacle Cord-retained Oculo-Orbital Prosthesis. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2021 May 1; 31:591-3.
 
[48]  Sharma A, Rahul GR, T. Poduval S, Shetty K. Implant-supported auricular prosthesis-an overview. J Oral Implantol. 2012 Aug 22: 0000.
 
[49]  dos Santos DM, Goiato MC, Pesqueira AA, et al. Prosthesis auricular with osseointegrated implants and quality of life. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21(1): 94-6.
 
[50]  Kiatamnuay S, Gettleman L, Khan Z, Goldsmith LJ. Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses. Part I: Skin dressings and solvent removers. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84(3): 335-40.
 
[51]  Wolfaardt JF, Tam V, Faulkner MG, Prasad N. Mechanical behavior of three maxillofacial prosthetic adhesive systems: a pilot project. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68(6): 943-9.
 
[52]  Abullais SS, Patel SI, Asiri EA, et al. Comparative Evaluation of 3 Commercial Mouthwash Formulations on Clinical Parameters of Chronic Gingivitis. Med Sci Monit. 2022; 28: e937111-1.
 
[53]  Tanveer W. Biomaterials for maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. In Advanced Dental Biomaterials 2019 Jan 1 (pp. 615-641). Woodhead Publishing.
 
[54]  Von Lindern JJ, Niederhagen B, Appel T. Treatment of soft tissue defects with exposed bone in the head and face region with alginates and hydrocolloid dressings. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60(10): 1126-30.
 
[55]  Metelmann HR, Podmelle F, Waite PD, et al. Conditioning in laser skin resurfacing–Betulin emulsion and skin recovery. J Cran-Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 41(3): 249-53.
 
[56]  Cheshmi B, Keyhan SO, Rayegani SM, et al. A literature review of applications of Kinesio Taping in the craniomaxillofacial region. CRANIO®. 2021 Dec 9: 1-8.
 
[57]  Morsy MS, Hassan AA, Alshawkani HA, et al. Effect of repeated moist heat sterilization on titanium implant–abutment interface—an in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2024 Jan 10.
 
[58]  Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp. 2000; 15(1).
 
[59]  Pandya VS, Morsy MS, Hassan AA, et al. Ultraviolet Disinfection (UV-D) Robots: Bridging the Gaps in Dentistry. Frontiers in Oral Health.; 4: 1270959.