An Institutional Perspective to Understand FOSS Adoption in Public Sectors: Case Studies in Ethiopia and India

Selamawit Molla Mekonnen^1, and Zegaye Seifu Wubishet¹

¹Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Cite this paper:
Selamawit Molla Mekonnen and Zegaye Seifu Wubishet. An Institutional Perspective to Understand FOSS Adoption in Public Sectors: Case Studies in Ethiopia and India. American Journal of Information Systems. 2016; 4(2):32-44. doi: 10.12691/ajis-4-2-2

Abstract

This paper is aimed at understanding institutional influences on Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) adoption in public sectors. It explores strategies, policies, and technical infrastructure so as to harness FOSS as an alternative technical solution in organizations such as the health sector. The study was conducted in India/Kerala and Ethiopia following interpretive qualitative research tradition. Data was collected at micro and macro level. While the micro level explored the acceptance of specific FOSS in Kerala and rejection in Ethiopia, the macro level studied how institutions outside the health sector were drawn upon to legitimize decisions. Data collection was conducted while at the same time analyzing and refining the data to find common themes for both settings. Subsequently, the themes were categorized interpretively into regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive institutions as provided by Scott (2001). The result shows regulative and normative institutions influence FOSS adoption in public sectors positively and that integrating FOSS with the proprietary dominated public sector of developing countries should begin by cultivating the normative institutional aspect. The normative aspect focuses on issues related to FOSS education and professional associations. Moreover, the study shows, technology by itself can facilitate its own adoption once it has gained large installed base; expanding the institutional framework to include a technological element. Practically, the study contributes to our understanding of the field level challenges in realizing the potential of FOSS for the benefits of public sector organizations in general and health sectors in particular in developing countries.

Keywords:
FOSS institutional theory Health Information Systems public sector institutional pillars

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Cook, I. and G. Horobin, Implementing eGovernment without promoting dependence: Open source software in developing countries in Southeast Asia. Public Administration and Development, 2006. 26(4): p. 279-289.
[2]	Cook, I. and G. Horobin, Implementing eGovernment with out promoting dependence:open source software in developing countries in Southeast Asia. Public Administration and Development, 2006. 26(4): p. 279-289.
[3]	Camara, G. and F. Fonseca, Information policies and Open source Software in developing Countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007. 58(1): p. 121-132.
[4]	Scacchi, W., et al., Understanding Free and Open Source Software Development Porcesses. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 2006. 11: p. 95-105.
[5]	Abbott, P., How can African countries advance their outsourcing industries: An overview of possible approaches. The African Journal of Information Systems, 2013. 5(1): p. 2.
[6]	Mengesha, N.T., Technology Capacity Development through OSS Implementation: The Case of Public Higher Education Institutions in Ethiopia. The African Journal Of Information Systems, 2010. 2(1): p. 2.
[7]	Effah, J. and G. Abbeyquaye, How FOSS Replaced Proprietary Software at a University: An Improvisation Perspective in a Low-income Country. The African Journal of Information Systems, 2014. 6(1): p. 2.
[8]	Twaakyondo, H.M. and J.H. Lungo, Open source software in health information systems: Opportunities and challenges. Tanzania Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2008. 2(1): p. 36-45.
[9]	Sheikh, Y.H. and A.D. Bakar, Open Source Software Solution for Healthcare: The Case of Health Information System in Zanzibar, in e-Infrastructure and e-Services for Developing Countries. 2011, Springer. p. 146-155.
[10]	Scott, W.R., Institutions and organizations. 2001: Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
[11]	DeVaujany, F., et al., Applying and theorising institutional frameworks in IS research. Information Technology & People, 2014. 27(3).
[12]	Pishdad, A., et al. Identifying Gaps in Institutional Theory. in Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2014. Auckland, New Zealand.
[13]	North, D.C., Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. 1990: Cambridge university press.
[14]	Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby, and C.R. Hinings, Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of management journal, 2002. 45(1): p. 58-80.
[15]	Sahay, S., et al., Interplay of institutional logics and implications for deinstitutionalization: case study of HMIS implementation in Tajikistan. Information Technologies & International Development, 2010. 6(3): p. pp. 19-32.
[16]	Palthe, J., Regulative, Normative, and Cognitive Elements of Organizations: Implications for Managing Change. Management and Organizational Studies, 2014. 1(2): p. p59.
[17]	Hsu, C., Y.-T. Lin, and T. Wang, A legitimacy challenge of a cross-cultural interorganizational information system. European Journal of Information Systems, 2015. 24: p. 278-294.
[18]	Suddaby, R., Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2010. 19(1): p. 14-20.
[19]	Hsu, C., Y.-T. Lin, and T. Wang, A legitimacy challenge of a cross-cultural interorganizational information system. European Journal of Information Systems, 2015. 24(3): p. 278-294.
[20]	Jepperson, R.L., Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 1991. 6: p. 143-163.
[21]	Avgerou, C., Information systems and global diversity. 2002: OUP Oxford.
[22]	Oliver, C., The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization studies, 1992. 13(4): p. 563-588.
[23]	Grisot, M., H. O., and A. Thorseng, Innovation of,in,on infrastructures: articulating the role of architecture in information infrastructure evolution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2014. 15(special issue): p. 197-219.
[24]	Hanseth, O. and E. Monteiro, Understanding information infrastructure. Unpublished Manuscript, Retrieved on 6th September from http://heim. ifi. uio. no/~ oleha/Publications/bok. pdf, 1998.
[25]	Aanestad, M. and T.B. Jensen, Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2011. 20(2): p. 161-176.
[26]	Dahlbom, B. and L. Mathiassen, Computers in context: The Philospphy and Practice of System Design. 1993, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publisher
[27]	Maguire, S., C. Hardy, and T.B. Lawrence, Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of management journal, 2004. 47(5): p. 657-679.
[28]	Hardy, C. and S. Maguire, Institutional entrepreneurship. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2008: p. 198-217.
[29]	Walsham, G., Interpreting information systems in organizations. Vol. 19. 1993: Wiley Chichester.
[30]	Walsham, G., Doing interpretive research. European journal of information systems, 2006. 15(3): p. 320-330.
[31]	Orlikowski, W.J. and J.J. Baroudi, Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research, 1991. 2(1): p. 1-28.
[32]	Klein, H.K. and M.D. Myers, A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS quarterly, 1999: p. 67-93.
[33]	Creswell, J.W., Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2013: Sage publications.
[34]	Braa, J., E. Monterio, and S. Sahay, Networks of action: sustainable health information systems across developing countries. . MIS quarterly, 2004. 28: p. 337-362.
[35]	Walsham, G., Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of information systems, 1995. 4(2): p. 74-81.
[36]	Elliott, R. and L. Timulak, Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research. A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology, 2005: p. 147-159.
[37]	Walsham, G., What is Interpretive Research? . (n.d), University of Oslo: Retrieved from http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF5740/h04/.../Lecture_1.pp.
[38]	Henfridsson, O. and B. Bygstad, The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution. Mis Quarterly, 2013. 37(3): p. 907-931.
[39]	Silva, L. and J. Backhouse. Becoming part of the furniture:the institutionalization of information systems. in IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 international conference on information systems and qualitative research. 1997. Philadelphia: Chapman & Hall, Ltd.
[40]	Wubishet, Z., Conceptualizing the Governance of Free and Open Source Software Development: A Framework Based on Case Studies of Three Software Projects in Norway, in Department of Informatics. 2011, Norway: Oslo.
[41]	Arthur, W.B., Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The economic journal, 1989. 99(394): p. 116-131.
[42]	Aanestad, A., Cultivating Networks: Implementing Surgical Telemedicine., in Department of Informatics. 2002, University of Oslo: Oslo.
[43]	Farrell, J. and G. Saloner, Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1985: p. 70-83.