American Journal of Industrial Engineering
ISSN (Print): 2377-4320 ISSN (Online): 2377-4339 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/ajie Editor-in-chief: Ajay Verma
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2026, 10(1), 8-11
DOI: 10.12691/ajie-10-1-1
Open AccessArticle

Performance-Based Selection of Diesel Generator Using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)

Friday Erhimudia Ukrakpor1, , Musa Momodu Omokhafe1 and Chukwuka Uboh1

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria

Pub. Date: April 19, 2026

Cite this paper:
Friday Erhimudia Ukrakpor, Musa Momodu Omokhafe and Chukwuka Uboh. Performance-Based Selection of Diesel Generator Using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). American Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2026; 10(1):8-11. doi: 10.12691/ajie-10-1-1

Abstract

The selection of diesel generators is a critical decision in environments requiring reliable and uninterrupted power supply. This study presents a structured multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for evaluating and selecting the most suitable diesel generator using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Four key performance criteria, fuel consumption, lifespan, estimated maintenance time, and mean time between failures (MTBF)were considered. Criteria weights were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), ensuring consistency and objectivity. A case study involving four 75 kVA diesel generator alternatives was conducted. The results indicate that Alternative C achieved the highest closeness coefficient (0.970), making it the most preferred option due to its superior reliability, longer lifespan, and lower maintenance requirements. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating AHP and TOPSIS for rational and data-driven decision-making in equipment selection.

Keywords:
Diesel generator TOPSIS AHP multi-criteria decision-making MTBF performance evaluation

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Durairaj, S., Sathiya Sekar, K., Ilangkumaran, M., RamManohar, M., Thyalan, B., Yuvaraj, E., & Ramesh, S. (2014). Multi-criteria decision model for biodiesel selection in an electrical power generator based on FAHP-GRA-TOPSIS. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(23), 226-233.
 
[2]  Hoseinpour, M., Sadrnia, H., Tabasizadeh, M., &Ghobadian, B. (2018). Evaluation of the effect of gasoline fumigation on performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with B20 using an experimental investigation and TOPSIS method. Fuel, 223, 277-285.
 
[3]  Sakthivel, G., Senthil Kumar, S., & Ilangkumaran, M. (2019). A genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network model with TOPSIS approach to optimize the engine performance. Biofuels, 10(6), 693-717.
 
[4]  Mehra, K. S., Goel, V., Singh, S., Pant, G., & Singh, A. K. (2023). Experimental investigation of emission characteristics of CI engine using biodiesel-diesel blends and best fuel selection: An AHP-TOPSIS approach. Materials Today: Proceedings.
 
[5]  Muqeem, M., Sherwani, A. F., Ahmad, M., & Khan, Z. A. (2019). Application of the Taguchi based entropy weighted TOPSIS method for optimisation of diesel engine performance and emission parameters. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 26(1), 69-94.
 
[6]  Abdulvahitoglu, A., & Kilic, M. (2022). A new approach for selecting the most suitable oilseed for biodiesel production; the integrated AHP-TOPSIS method. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), 101604.
 
[7]  Galgali, V. S., Vaidya, G. A., & Ramachandran, M. (2016, September). Selection of distributed generation system using multicriteria-decision making fuzzy TOPSIS optimization. In 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions)(ICRITO) (pp. 86-89). IEEE.
 
[8]  Sarkar, A. (2013). A TOPSIS method to evaluate the technologies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(1), 2-13.
 
[9]  Yadav, S. K., Joseph, D., &Jigeesh, N. (2018). A review on industrial applications of TOPSIS approach. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 30(1), 23-28.
 
[10]  Bhutia, P. W., &Phipon, R. (2012). Application of AHP and TOPSIS method for alternative selection problem. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 2(10), 43-50.
 
[11]  Deb, M., Debbarma, B., Majumder, A., & Banerjee, R. (2016). Performance–emission optimization of a diesel-hydrogen dual fuel operation: A NSGA II coupled TOPSIS MADM approach. Energy, 117, 281-290.
 
[12]  Mathebula, J., & Mbuli, N. (2024, July). Application of TOPSIS in Power Sytems: A Review. In 2024 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
 
[13]  Kelemenis, A., &Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection. Expert systems with applications, 37(7), 4999-5008.
 
[14]  Kumar, C., Rana, K. B., & Tripathi, B. (2020). Performance evaluation of diesel–additives ternary fuel blends: An experimental investigation, numerical simulation using hybrid Entropy–TOPSIS method and economic analysis. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 20, 100675.
 
[15]  Lootsma, F. A. (1999). Multi-criteria decision analysis via ratio and difference judgement. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
 
[16]  Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.