Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis among Infertile Patients Suspected with Female Genital Tuberculosis

Venkanna Bhanothu^1, , Jane Theophilus¹ and Roya Rozati²

¹Department of Zoology, UCS, Osmania University, Hyderabad, AP, India

²MHRT Hospital & Research Centre, Hyderabad, AP, India

Cite this paper:
Venkanna Bhanothu, Jane Theophilus and Roya Rozati. Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis among Infertile Patients Suspected with Female Genital Tuberculosis. American Journal of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology. 2014; 2(2):22-33. doi: 10.12691/ajidm-2-2-1

Abstract

Female genital tuberculosis (FGTB) is a symptomless disease that evidences itself only when it is investigated for infertility. Demonstration of the etiologic agent by H & E staining or Z-N staining for acid fast bacilli, smear microscopy, culture of sputum and other body fluids were often less specific. We therefore, proposed to use the endo-ovarian tissue biopsies and pelvic aspirated fluids for the detection of FGTB among infertile women by conventional versus genotypic methods. A prospective case-control study was undertaken. A total of 302 specimens were collected from 202 infertile women highly suspected of having FGTB on laparoscopic examination and from 100 control women of reproductive age. Out of these 302 specimens, 150 (49.67%) were premenstrual endometrial tissue biopsies (ETBs), 95 (31.46%) were ovarian tissue biopsies (OTBs) and 57 (18.87%) were pelvic aspirated fluids (PAFs). All specimens tested by conventional/ phenotypic methods were later compared with multi-gene/ multi-primer PCR (multi-gene PCR) method using four sets of primers for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) DNA in a single tube-single step reaction and correlated with laparoscopic findings. The presence of MTB DNA was observed in 49.5% of ETBs, 33.17% of OTBs and 5.44% of PAF specimens collected from highly suspected FGTB patients. All control women were confirmed as negative for tuberculosis. The conventional methods showed 99% to 100% specificity with a low sensitivity, ranging from 21.78% to 42.08% while H & E staining showed a sensitivity of 51.48%. Multi-gene PCR method was found to have a much higher sensitivity of 70.29% with MTB64 gene, 86.63% with 19kDa antigen gene at species and TRC4 element at regional MTB complex level and 88.12% with 32kDa protein gene at genus level (Pearson χ2 = 214.612, 1df, McNemar’s test value = 0.000). The specificity of multi-gene PCR was 100%. We suggest site specific sampling, irrespective of sample type and amplification of the 19kDa antigen gene in combination with TRC4 element as a successful multi-gene PCR method for the diagnosis of FGTB and differentiation of mycobacterial infection among endo-ovarian tissue biopsies and PAFs taken from infertile women.

Keywords:
endo-ovarian tissue biopsy processing conventional/ phenotypic methods multi-gene/ multi-primer polymerase chain reaction female genital tuberculosis (FGTB) Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	Scrimin F, Limone A, Wiesenfeld U, Guaschino S. Tubercular endometritis visualized as endometrial micropolyps during hysteroscopic procedure. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281(6): 1079-80.
[2]	Tripathy SN, Tripathy SN. Gynaecological tuberculosis -an update. Indian J Tuberc 1998; 45: 193-7.
[3]	Aka N, Vural EZ. Evaluation of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis for genital involvement. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23(4): 337-40.
[4]	M J Jassawalla. Genital tuberculosis - a diagnostic dilemma. J Obstet Gynecol India 2006; 56 (3): 203-204.
[5]	Mani R, Nayak S, Kagal A, Deshpande S, Dandge N, Bharadwaj R. Tuberculous endometritis in infertility: a bacteriological and histopathological study. Indian J Tuberc 2003; 50: 161.
[6]	Marjorie PG, Holenarasipur RV. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an overview. Am Fam Physician 2005; 72: 1761-8.
[7]	Tripathi SM. Infertility and pregnancy outcome in female genital tuberculosis; Int J Gynecol Obstet 2002; 76(2): 159-63.
[8]	Namavar Jahromi B, Parsanezhad ME, Ghane-Shirazi R. Female genital tuberculosis and infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 75: 269-272.
[9]	Dam P, Shirazee HH, Goswami SK, Ghosh S, Ganesh A, Chaudhury K, Chakravarty B. Role of latent genital tuberculosis in repeated IVF failure in the Indian Clinical setting. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006; 61(4): 223-227.
[10]	Parikh FR, Naik N, Nadkarni SG, Soonawala SB, Kamat SA, Parikh RM. Genital tuberculosis – a major pelvic factor causing infertility in Indian women. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 497-500.
[11]	Chakrabarti AK, Sen S, Banerjee A, Roy K. Female genital tuberculosis- a retrospective study. Ind J Tub 1998; 45: 101-3.
[12]	Nawaz K. Frequency of endometrial tuberculosis: a histopathological study of endometrial specimens. J Postgrad Med Inst 2005; 19(1): 97-100.
[13]	Ismael Kassim, Ray CG (editors). Sherris Medical Microbiology (4th ed.) McGraw Hill. 2004.
[14]	Parrish NM, Dick JD, Bishai WR. Mechanisms of latency in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol 1998; 6: 107-12.
[15]	Ben Youssef LB, Chelli H, Belhadj A. Current anatomo-clinical aspects of genital tuberculosis in women. Apropos of 49 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1985; 14: 59-65.
[16]	Varma TR. Genital tuberculosis and subsequent fertility. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1991; 35: 1-11.
[17]	N Vijaya Bhanu, Urvashi B Singh, Milan Chakraborty, Naga Suresh, Jyoti Arora, Tanu Rana, D Takkar, Pradeep Seth. Improved diagnostic value of PCR in the diagnosis of female genital tuberculosis leading to infertility. J Med Microbiol 2005; 54: 927-931.
[18]	Thangappah RBP, Paramasivan CN, Narayanan S. Evaluating PCR, culture and histopathology in the diagnosis of female genital tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res 2011; 134: 40-46.
[19]	Raut VS, Mahashur AA, Sheth SS. The mantoux test in the diagnosis of genital tuberculosis in women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 2: 165-9.
[20]	Gogate S, Joshi S, Gogate A. Tubal factor in infertility –endoscopic and microbiological evaluation. J Obstet Gynecol India 1994; 44: 282-5.
[21]	Sweet RL, Mills J, Hadley KW, Blumenstock E, Schachter J, Robbie MO, et al. Use of laparoscopy to determine the microbiologic etiology of acute salpingitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 134: 68-74.
[22]	Kapoor N, Pawar S, Sirakova TD, Deb C, Warren WL, et al. Human granuloma in vitro model, for TB dormancy and resuscitation. PLoS One 2013; 8: e53657.
[23]	Falk V, Ludviksson K, Agren G. Genital tuberculosis in women: analysis of 187 newly diagnosed cases from 47 Swedish hospitals during the ten-year period 1968 to 1977. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 933.
[24]	Punnonen R, Kiilholma P, Meurman L. Female genital tuberculosis and consequent infertility. Int J Fertil 1983; 28(4): 235-8.
[25]	Abebe M, Lakew M, Kidane D, Lakew Z, Kiros K, et al. Female genital tuberculosis in Ethiopia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84: 241-246.
[26]	Simon HB, Weinstein AJ, Pasternak MS, et al. Genitourinary tuberculosis: clinical features in a general hospital population. Am J Med 1977; 63: 410.
[27]	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculosis. MMWR Morb Mortal Weekly Rep 1996; 45: 950-952.
[28]	Cole ST, R Brosch, J Parkhill, T Garnier, C Churcher, D Harris, SV Gordon, K Eiglmeier, S Gas, CE Barry, F Tekaia, K Badcock, D Basham, D Brown, T Chillingworth, R Connor, R Davies, K Devlin, T Feltwell, S Gentles, N Hamlin, S Holroyd, K Jagels, BC Barrel. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 1998; 393: 537-544.
[29]	Kusum Sharma, Vishali Gupta, Reema Bansal, Aman Sharma, Meera Sharma, Amod Gupta. Novel multi-targeted polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of presumed tubercular uveitis. J Ophthal Inflamm and Infect 2013; 3: 25.
[30]	Weigert K. Eine Kleine Verbesserung der haematoxylin-van Gieson-Methode. Z Wiss Mikr 1904; 2: 1-5.
[31]	Van Gieson I. Laboratory notes of technical methods for the nervous system. New York Med J 1889; 50: 57-60.
[32]	Sheehan D, Hrapchak B. Theory and practice of histotechnology, 2nd Ed, Battelle Press, Ohio. 1980; 235-237.
[33]	Crookham J, Dapson R. Hazardous chemicals in the histopathology laboratory, 2nd ED, 1991, Anatech..
[34]	Murray PR, EJ Baron, JH Jorgensen, MA Pfaller, RH Yolken (ed.) Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. 2003. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
[35]	Kent PT, GP Kubica. Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory. USDHHS, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta. 1985.
[36]	National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Approved guideline protection of laboratory workers from occupationally acquired infections, 2nd ed. NCCLS, Wayne, Pa. 2001; M29-A2.
[37]	Mustafa AS, Ahmed A, Abal AT, Chugh TD. Establishment and evaluation of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of mycobacteria and specific identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Tuber Lung Dis 1995; 76(4): 336-43.
[38]	Helen A Fletcher, Helen D Donoghue, G Michael Taylor, Adri GM van der Zanden, Mark Spigelman. Molecular analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from a family of 18th century Hungarians. Microbiol 2003; 149: 143-151.
[39]	Sujatha N, Vijayalakshmi P, Narayannan PR, Venkatesan P, Girish C, et al. Evaluation of PCR using TRC4 and IS6110 primers in detection of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 2006-2008.
[40]	Parandaman V, Narayanan S, Narayanan P. Utility of polymerase chain reaction using two probes for rapid diagnosis of tubercular pleuritis in comparison to conventional methods. Indian J Med Res 2000; 112: 47-51.
[41]	Dil-Afroze, Abdul Waheed Mir, Altaf Kirmani, Shakeel-ul-Rehman, Rafiqa Eachkoti, et al. Improved diagnosis of central nervous system tuberculosis by MPB64-target PCR. Brazil J Microbiol 2008; 39: 209-213.
[42]	Abdulmonam Saied Barouni, Halha Ostrensky Saridakis, Marilda Carlos Vidotto. Detection of mycobacterium in clinical samples by multi primer polymerase chain reaction. Brazil J Microbiol 2004; 35: 29-32.
[43]	Kidane D, Olobo JO, Habte A, Negesse Y, Aseffa A. Identification of the causative organism of tuberculous lympadenitis in Ethiopia by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 11(40): 4230-4234.
[44]	Del Portillo P, MC Thomas, E Martinez, C Maranon, B Valladares, et al. Multi-primer PCR system for differential identification of mycobacteria in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 324-328.
[45]	Telenti A, F Marchesi, M Balz, F Bally, EC Bo¨ttger, T Bodmer. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 175-178.
[46]	Michael Ka¨ser, Julia Hauser, Pamela Small, Gerd Pluschke. Large sequence polymorphisms unveil the phylogenetic relationship of environmental and pathogenic mycobacteria related to Mycobacterium ulcerans. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75(17): 5667.
[47]	William E Grizzle, Walter C Bell, Katherine C Sexton. Issues in collecting, processing and storing human tissues and associated information to support biomedical research. Cancer Biomark 2010; 9(1-6): 531-549.
[48]	Robert M Vodegel, Marcelus CJM de Jong, Hillegonda J Meijer, Marijn B Weytingh, Hendri H Pas, et al. Enhanced diagnostic immunofluorescence using biopsies transported in saline. BMC Dermatol 2004; 4(10): 1-7. (Saline).
[49]	T Krenacs, E Bagdi, E Stelkovics, L Bereczki, L Krenacs. How we process trephine biopsy specimens: epoxy resin embedded bone marrow biopsies. J Clin Pathol 2005; 58: 897-903. (TBS).
[50]	Soumitesh Chakravorty, Jaya Sivaswami Tyagi. Novel multipurpose methodology for detection of mycobacteria in pulmonary and extrapulmonary specimens by smear microscopy, culture and PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43(6): 2697-2702.
[51]	Ganoza CA, Ricaldi JN, Chauca J, Rojas G, Munayco C, et al. Novel hypertonic saline-sodium hydroxide (HS-SH) method for decontamination and concentration of sputum samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis microscopy and culture. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57(Pt 9): 1094-8.
[52]	Syun-Ichi T, Okuzumi K, Ishiko H, Ken-ichi N, Ohkubo A, Nagai R. Genus specific polymerase chain reaction for the mycobacterial dnaj gene and species-specific oligonucleotide probes. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 446-450.
[53]	Ramya Barani, Gopalsamy Sarangan, Tessa Antony, Soundararajan Periyasamy, Anupma Jyoti Kindo, et al. Improved detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using two independent PCR targets in a tertiary care centre in South India. J Infect Dev Ctries 2012; 6(1): 46-52.
[54]	S. Lantheaume, S. Soler, B. Issartel, et al. “Peritoneal tuberculosis simulating advanced ovarian carcinoma: a case report,” Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite 2003; 31(7-8): 624-626.
[55]	Clarridge JE, RM Shawar, TM Shinik, BB Plikaytis. Large-scale use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in routine mycobacteriology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 2049-2056.
[56]	Fauville-Dufaux M, B Vanfleteren, L De Witt, JP Vincke, JP Van Vooren, MD Yates, E Serruys, J Content. Rapid detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a 162 bp DNA fragment from antigen 85. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992; 11: 797-803.
[57]	Kazue Hirano, Akio Aono, Mitsuyoshi Takahashi, Chiyoji Abe. Mutations including IS6110 insertion in the gene encoding the MPB64 protein of capilia TB-negative Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42(1): 390-392.
[58]	Blanca I. Restrepo. Convergence of the tuberculosis and diabetes epidemics: renewal of old acquaintances. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45(4): 436-438.
[59]	Lawn SD, Zumla AI. Tuberculosis. Lancet 2011; 378(9785): 57-72.