Frequency Domain Comparison of Multi-lump and Distributed Parameter Models for Pressurized Water Reactor Cores

Taipeng Zhang^1, and Keith E. Holbert¹

¹School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA

Cite this paper:
Taipeng Zhang and Keith E. Holbert. Frequency Domain Comparison of Multi-lump and Distributed Parameter Models for Pressurized Water Reactor Cores. American Journal of Energy Research. 2013; 1(1):17-24. doi: 10.12691/ajer-1-1-3

Abstract

Multi-lump and distributed parameter models are used to analyze the frequency behavior of a pressurized water reactor (PWR). The distributed parameter model is built upon the partial differential equations describing heat transfer and fluid flow in the reactor core. For comparison, a lumped parameter reactor core model with multiple fuel and coolant lumps is employed. The features of the transfer functions for both models are evaluated. The distributed parameter model has the ability to offer an accurate transfer function at any location throughout the reactor core. In contrast, the multi-lump parameter model only provides an average value in a given region (lump). Comparisons show that the multi-lump model results are only most favorable for frequencies less than ~0.1 Hz.

Keywords:
nuclear power reactor

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

References:

[1]	T. W. Kerlin, “Dynamic analysis and control of pressurized water reactors,” Control and Dynamic Systems, Advances in Theory and Applications, edited by C.T. Leondes, Academic Press, vol. 14, pp. 103-212, 1978.
[2]	T. W. Kerlin, E. M. Katz, J. G. Thakkar, and J. E. Strange, “Theoretical and experimental dynamic analysis of the H. B. Robinson nuclear plant,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 30, pp. 299-316, Sept. 1976.
[3]	E. P. Gyftopoulos and H. B. Smets, “Transfer functions of distributed parameter nuclear reactor systems,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 405-414, 1959.
[4]	W. Ciechanowicz, “Simulation of the thermal processes in the reactor core based on an exact solution of the thermal diffusion and heat flow equations,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 75-79, 1962.
[5]	W. Ciechanowicz, “A comparison of the transfer function of the internal reactor loop for the cases of both distributed and lumped parameters,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 16, pp. 456-459, 1963.
[6]	W. Ciechanowicz, On The Simulation of Transfer Functions For a Distributed Parameter System, Kjeller Report KR-59, Institutt for Atomenergi, Kjeller, Norway, 1963.
[7]	J. A. Thie, Power Reactor Noise, American Nuclear Society, 1981.
[8]	K. E. Holbert, N. Venkatesh, “Valid ranges for using the cross-power spectral density phase angle for moderator temperature coefficient sign determination,” Nuclear Science and Engineering, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 203-211, 1995.