American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
ISSN (Print): ISSN Pending ISSN (Online): ISSN Pending Website: Editor-in-chief: Dario Galante
Open Access
Journal Browser
American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2014, 2(1), 1-3
DOI: 10.12691/ajcdr-2-1-1
Open AccessArticle

Correction of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is it Effective to Improve Left Ventricular Functions and Reduce Its Mass?

Hamdy D. Elayouty1, , Magdy Ibrahim Wahdan1, Marwan Hassan Elkasas1, Hany Salman Fiesal1 and Eiman M. Altahawi2

1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

2Department of Cardiology, Ismailia General Hospital, Ismailia, Egypt

Pub. Date: January 12, 2014

Cite this paper:
Hamdy D. Elayouty, Magdy Ibrahim Wahdan, Marwan Hassan Elkasas, Hany Salman Fiesal and Eiman M. Altahawi. Correction of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is it Effective to Improve Left Ventricular Functions and Reduce Its Mass?. American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research. 2014; 2(1):1-3. doi: 10.12691/ajcdr-2-1-1


Background: Aortic valve stenosis causes gradual obstruction to left ventricular outflow tract. It is a common valvular disease that carries many life threatening complications. We hypothesized that the reduction or elimination of the pressure gradient across the aortic valve after correction of the stenotic lesion would lead to regression of left ventricular mass and improve left ventricular functions. Aim of the work is to assess the effectiveness of the correction and factors controlling these changes in left ventricular mass index and functions. Methods: preoperative and postoperative Electro-cardiography and echocardiography were performed for all patients. The corrective procedures included aortic valve replacement, balloon aortic valvuloplasty and open valve repair. Results: Sixty patients had correction of aortic valve stenosis (44 males, 16 females). ECG score preoperatively ranged between3 and 9 with a mean of 6 ± 1.63. Postoperatively, it ranged between 0 and 6 and mean of 3 ± 0.7. The mean LVED/BSA was reduced from 32.52 preoperatively to 30.41 postoperatively. The mean interventricular septal thickness index was reduced by 1.03. The mean left ventricular posterior wall thickness index was reduced by 0.99. Mean left ventricular mass index was reduced by 31.86 gm. The mean ejection fraction increased by 6.45. Mean trans-aortic peak gradient was reduced by 41.36 mmHg. Conclusions: Correction of aortic valve stenosis improves systolic and diastolic left ventricular function and a reduction in left ventricular mass index. Aortic root enlargement procedures can be safely avoided.

aortic stenosis correction of aortic stenosis left ventricular mass index ejection fraction

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit


[1]  Chambers J. Aortic stenosis. BMJ 2005, 330:801-2.
[2]  Connolly H M, Orszulak TA, Osborn SLand Roger Hodge DO: Aortic vave replacement for aortic stenosiswith severe left ventricular dysfunction; prognostic indicators. Circulation 1997, 95:395-400.
[3]  Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garacia-Acuna JM and Fernandez MV: Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass; implication for surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thoracic Cardiovascular Surg 1996, 112: 273-80.
[4]  Sim EK, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV: Influence of prosthesid size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994, 8: 293-7.
[5]  Penta de Peppo A, Zeitani J and Nardi P: small functional size after aortic valve replacement; no risk in young to middle-age patients. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2005, 79: 1915-20.
[6]  Dare AJ, Veinot JP, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD and Schaff HV: New observation on the etiology of aortic valve disease a surgical pathology study of 236 cases. Hum Pathol. 1993, 24:1330-8.
[7]  Misawa Y: left ventricular mass index in aortic valve surgery; a new index for early valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg, 24: 667-8.
[8]  Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Di Terlizzi M, Yacoub MH, Sheridan DJ and Pennell DJ:Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement- cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothoracic Sur.2003, 24:59-65.
[9]  Knez I, Maier R, Rehak P and Rigler B: left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to critical aortic stenosis, an approach to disqualify the myth of valve prosthesis- patient mismatch. Eur. J Cardiothoracic Surg. 2001, 19:797-805.