Biomass and Morphology Responses of Fritillaria unibracteata to Shading and Warming

Haixia Guo^{1, 2}, Fusun Shi², Cong Wu², Bo Xu², Yan Wu^2, and Ning Wu^2,

¹Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu, China

²Ecological Restoration and Biodiversity Conservation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China

Cite this paper:
Haixia Guo, Fusun Shi, Cong Wu, Bo Xu, Yan Wu and Ning Wu. Biomass and Morphology Responses of Fritillaria unibracteata to Shading and Warming. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2017; 5(1):19-23. doi: 10.12691/aees-5-1-3

Abstract

Fritillaria unibracteata Hsiao and Hsia (Liliaceae) (F. unibracteata) is a perennial and protected species distributed in the meadow or under the shrub at the eastern Tibetan Plateau. To understand how F. unibracteata response to changing environment, OTC (open top chamber) and PSN (Polypropylene shading nets) were used to simulate warming and shading effects. Two years later, dry biomass of each organ (leaf, stem, bulb and root), leaf length (LL), leaf area (LA) and special leaf area (SLA) were measured individually to determine F. unibracteata responses to environmental change. The results showed that: (1) total biomass (TB), leaf biomass (LB) and root biomass (RB) increased significantly under warming treatment (P<0.05), but no significant change under shading; (2) LB/RB was decreased under warming, while both LB/RB and AB/BeB showed no significant responses to shading; (3) leaf morphological characteristics responded significantly to warming and shading; leaf length (LL) significantly increased under both shading and warming treatments (P<0.05); leaf area (LA) increased significantly under warming treatment; special leaf area (SLA) increased significantly under shading treatment. Based on the results above, we get conclusions as below: (1) F. unibracteata responded to warming and shading effects differently; (2) For perennial alpine plants such as F. unibracteata, morphological traits may be more sensitive to environment variations than other traits.

Keywords:
Fritillaria unibracteata shading warming biomass allocation leaf morphology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Troughton, A., “Further studies on the relationship between shoot and root systems of grasses”, Grass and Forage Science, 15, 41-47. March, 1960.
[2]	Bloom, A. J., F. S. Chapin, and H. A. Mooney, “Resource Limitation in Plants - an Economic Analogy”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 363-392. November, 1985.
[3]	Tilman, D., Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1988.
[4]	Wright, S.D. and Mcconnaughay, K. D. M., “Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny”, Plant Species Biology, 17, 119-131. December, 2002.
[5]	Štěpán, J., Patáčová, E. And Klimešová J., “Effects of fertilization and competition on plant biomass allocation and internal resources: does plantago lanceolata follow the rules of economic theory?”, Folia Geobotanica, 49(1), 49-64. May, 2014.
[6]	Poorter, H., and Remkes, C., “Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate”, Oecologia, 83, 553-559. February, 1990.
[7]	Poorter, H., Niklas K. J., Reich P. B., Oleksyn J., Poot P., and Mommer L., “Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control”, New Phytologist, 193, 30-50. January, 2011.
[8]	Committee of Flora of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Science Press, Peking, 2004.
[9]	Xu, B., Wang, J., Guo, H., Shi, F., and Wu, N., “Morphological adaptation of wild Fritillaria unibracteata to alpine conditions in the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau”, Chin J Appl Envirorn Biol, 20(6), 955-961. May, 2014.
[10]	Xu, B., Wang, J. N., Shi, F. S., Gao, J., and Wu, N., “Adaptation of biomass allocation patterns of wild Fritillaria unibracteata to alpine environment in the eastern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau”., Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37(3), 187-196.January, 2013.
[11]	Loach, K., “Shade tolerance in tree seedlings. II. Growth analysis of plants raised under artificial shade”, New Phytologist, 69, 273-286. April, 1970.
[12]	Piper, F. I., “Patterns of carbon storage in relation to shade tolerance in southern South American species”, American Journal of Botany, 102(9), 1442-1452. September, 2015.
[13]	Lehto, T. and Grace, J., “Carbon balance of tropical tree seedlings:a comparison of two Species”, New Phytologist, 127, 455-463. June, 1994.
[14]	Sims, L., Pastor J., Lee T., and Dewey B., “Nitrogen, phosphorus and light effects on growth and allocation of biomass and nutrients in wild rice”, Oecologia, 170, 65-76. March, 2012.
[15]	Li, X. Dai, Y. and Chen, S., “Growth and physiological characteristics of Fritillaria cirrhosa in response to high irradiance and shade in age-related growth phases”, Environmental and Experimental Botany, 67, 77-83. November, 2009.
[16]	Larigauderie A., Ellis B. A., Mills J. N., and Kummerow J., “The Effect of Root and Shoot Temperatures on Growth of Ceanothus-Greggii Seedlings”, Annals of Botany, 67, 97-101. February, 1991.
[17]	Geng, Y. P., Pan X. Y., Xu C. Y., Zhang W. J., Li B., and Chen J. K., “Plasticity and ontogenetic drift of biomass allocation in response to above- and below-ground resource availabilities in perennial herbs: a case study of Alternanthera philoxeroides”, Ecological Research, 22, 255-260. July, 2007.
[18]	Mitchell, K. J., “Influence of Light and Temperature on the Growth of Ryegrass (Lolium spp.): I. Pattern of Vegetative Development”, Physiologia Plantarum, 6, 21-46. January, 1953.
[19]	Huante, P. and Rincon E., “Responses to light changes in tropical deciduous woody seedlings with contrasting growth rates”, Oecologia, 113, 53-66. December, 1997.
[20]	Markesteijn L. and Poorter L., “Seedling root morphology and biomass allocation of 62 tropical tree species in relation to drought- and shading-tolerance”, Journal of Ecology, 97, 311-325. March, 2009.
[21]	Toledo-Aceves T. and Swaine M. D., “Biomass allocation and photosynthetic responses of lianas and pioneer tree seedlings to light”, Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology, 34, 38-49. July-August, 2008.
[22]	Bing Y. and Wang J., “Effect of long-term warming on growth and biomass allocation of Abies faxoniana seedlings”, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30(21), 5994-6000. January, 2010.
[23]	Wang C. and Wang S., “A review of research on responses of leaf traits to climate Change”, Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39: 206-216. January, 2015.
[24]	Walters M. B. and Reich P. B., “Low-light carbon balance and shading tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ?”, New Phytologist, 143, 143-154. July, 1999.
[25]	Portsmuth A. and Niinemets U., “Interacting controls by light availability and nutrient supply on biomass allocation and growth of Betula pendula and B. pubescens seedlings”, Forest Ecology and Management, 227, 122-134. May, 2006.
[26]	Allred B. W., Fuhlendorf S. D., Monaco T. A., and Will R. E., “Morphological and physiological traits in the success of the invasive plant Lespedeza cuneata”, Biological Invasions, 12, 739-749. May, 2009.
[27]	Wright I. J. and Westoby M., “Understanding seedling growth relationships through specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration: generalisations across growth forms and growth irradiance”, Oecologia, 127, 21-29. March, 2001.
[28]	Shipley B. “Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate?”, A meta-analysis, Functional Ecology, 20, 565-574. June, 2006.