Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2328-3912 ISSN (Online): 2328-3920 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/aees Editor-in-chief: Alejandro González Medina
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2022, 10(10), 614-621
DOI: 10.12691/aees-10-10-3
Open AccessArticle

Morphometric Characters of Apis cerana indica Worker Bees under Urban, Rural and Wild Habitats

Vinutha R Bhatta1 and Naresh Kumar A2,

1Jyoti Nivas College Autonomous, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

2Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nādu, India

Pub. Date: October 10, 2022

Cite this paper:
Vinutha R Bhatta and Naresh Kumar A. Morphometric Characters of Apis cerana indica Worker Bees under Urban, Rural and Wild Habitats. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2022; 10(10):614-621. doi: 10.12691/aees-10-10-3

Abstract

Of the 30 morphological characters, 15 varied markedly among populations from three distinct habitats, namely urban (an urban green space), rural (rural horticultural area), and wild (a national park). Significant differences (n = 225; p< 0.05) were noticed in body length; length and width of the abdomen; length and width of forewings as well as angles 31, 32, and 34; width of hindwing and wing angles H1, H2, and H3; and length and width of the tibia of the hind leg and width of the metatarsus. Among the 15 characters, values of 12 were the highest among the urban bees and included body length, length and width of the abdomen, length of the forewing, width of metatarsus, and forewing venation angles 31, 32, and 34 and hind wing angles H1, H2, and H3. The rural bees were characterized by significantly wide forewing and tibia whereas the wild bees showed significantly long hind wings. Principal component analysis confirmed the association between habitat and morphological characters, with three independent morpho clusters explaining maximum variance in the length and width of hind wing, length of antenna and of proboscis, and forewing venation angle 31 and hind wing angle H2. Cluster analysis also showed that the populations of urban bees were morphologically related to rural bees and were distinct from the wild populations. The study thus highlights the positive influence of urban habitats on the social honey bee species Apis cerana indica and shows that green spaces in cities are not only aesthetically appealing but also confer ecological benefits.

Keywords:
Apis cerana morphometry urbanisation conservation

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Michener, C. D. (1974). The social behavior of the bees. Bilknap press of Harvard University, Cambridge (UK).
 
[2]  Velthius, H.H.W. (1992). Pollen digestion and the evolution of sociality in bees. Bee world, 73(2): 77-89.
 
[3]  Ruttner, F., Tassencourt, L., & Louveaux, J. (1978). Biometrical-statistical analysis of the geographic variability of Apis mellifera LI Material and methods. Apidologie, 9(4), 363-381.
 
[4]  Coulson, R. N., Pinto, M. A., Tchakerian, M. D., Baum, K. A., Rubink, W. L., & Johnston, J. S. (2005). Feral honey bees in pine forest landscapes of east Texas. Forest ecology and Management, 215(1-3), 91-102.
 
[5]  Minckley, R. L., Cane, J. H., Kervin, L., & Yanega, D. (2003). Biological impediments to measures of competition among introduced honey bees and desert bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 306-319.
 
[6]  Moroń, D., Szentgyörgyi, H., Wantuch, M., Celary, W., Westphal, C., Settele, J., & Woyciechowski, M. (2008). Diversity of wild bees in wet meadows: implications for conservation. Wetlands, 28(4), 975-983.
 
[7]  Bogusch, P., Heneberg, P., & Astapenková, A. (2020). Habitat requirements of wetland bees and wasps: several reed-associated species still rely on peaty meadows and other increasingly rare wetland habitats. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 28(6), 921-936.
 
[8]  Free, J. B. (1970). The flower constancy of bumblebees. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 395-402.
 
[9]  Rodionov, V. V., & Shabarshov, I. A. (1986). The fascinating world of bees. Imported Publication.
 
[10]  Spivak, M., Mader, E., Vaughan, M., & Euliss Jr, N. H. (2011). The plight of the bees. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 34-38.
 
[11]  Goulson, D., Hanley, M. E., Darvill, B., Ellis, J. S., & Knight, M. E. (2005). Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biological Conservation, 122(1), 1-8.
 
[12]  Gels, J. A., Held, D. W., & Potter, D. A. (2002). Hazards of insecticides to the bumble bees Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) foraging on flowering white clover in turf. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95(4), 722-728.
 
[13]  Thompson H. M. (2003) Behavioural effects of pesticides in bees-their potential for use in risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 12: 317-30.
 
[14]  Higes, M., Martín-Hernández, R., Botías, C., Bailón, E. G., González-Porto, A. V., Barrios, L., ... & Meana, A. (2008). How natural infection by Nosema ceranae causes honeybee colony collapse. Environmental Microbiology, 10(10), 2659-2669.
 
[15]  Benaets, K., Van Geystelen, A., Cardoen, D., De Smet, L., de Graaf, D. C., Schoofs, L., & Wenseleers, T. (2017). Covert deformed wing virus infections have long-term deleterious effects on honeybee foraging and survival. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1848), 20162149.
 
[16]  Czech, B., Krausman, P. R., & Devers, P. K. (2000). Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States: associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States reflect the integration of economic sectors, supporting the theory and evidence that economic growth proceeds at the competitive exclusion of nonhuman species in the aggregate. BioScience, 50(7), 593-601.
 
[17]  Matteson, K. C., Ascher, J. S., & Langellotto, G. A. (2008). Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101(1), 140-150.
 
[18]  Ahrne, K., Bengtsson, J., & Elmqvist, T. (2009). Bumble bees (Bombus spp) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. PloS one, 4(5), e5574.
 
[19]  Carre, G., Roche, P., Chifflet, R., Morison, N., Bommarco, R., Harrison-Cripps, J., & Vaissiere, B. E. (2009). Landscape context and habitat type as drivers of bee diversity in European annual crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(1-2), 40-47.
 
[20]  Sirohi, M. H., Jackson, J., Edwards, M., & Ollerton, J. (2015). Diversity and abundance of solitary and primitively eusocial bees in an urban centre: a case study from Northampton (England). Journal of Insect Conservation, 19(3), 487-500.
 
[21]  Bhatta, V. R., & Kumar, A. N. (2020). Native bee diversity and abundance in an urban green space in Bengaluru, India. Journal of Environmental Biology, 41(6), 1536-1541.
 
[22]  Buchholz, S., Gathof, A. K., Grossmann, A. J., Kowarik, I., & Fischer, L. K. (2020). Wild bees in urban grasslands: urbanisation, functional diversity and species traits. Landscape and Urban Planning, 196, 103731.
 
[23]  Hall, D. M., Camilo, G. R., Tonietto, R. K., Ollerton, J., Ahrné, K., Arduser, M., … Threlfall, C. G. (2017). The city as a refuge for insect pollinators. Conservation Biology, 31, 24-29.
 
[24]  Bates, A. J., Sadler, J. P., Fairbrass, A. J., Falk, S. J., Hale, J. D., & Matthews, T. J. (2011). Changing bee and hoverfly pollinator assemblages along an urban-rural gradient. PloS one, 6(8), e23459.
 
[25]  Ollerton, J., Winfree, R., & Tarrant, S. (2011). How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos, 120(3), 321-326.
 
[26]  Harrison, T., & Winfree, R. (2015). Urban drivers of plant-pollinator interactions. Functional Ecology, 29(7), 879-888.
 
[27]  Bhatta, V. R., & Kumar, A. N. (2021). Survey of bee friendly flowering plants and bee-plant interaction in an urban green space in Bengaluru, India. Journal of Environmental Biology, 42(5), 1330-1337.
 
[28]  Good, R. (2000). The value of gardening for wildlife-what contribution does it make to conservation? British Wildlife, 12(2), 77-84.
 
[29]  Meurk, C. D., Blaschke, P. M., & Simcock, R. (2013). Ecosystem services in New Zealand cities. Ecosystem services in New Zealand: conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, 254-273.
 
[30]  Thompson, K., Austin, K. C., Smith, R. M., Warren, P. H., Angold, P. G., & Gaston, K. J. (2003). Urban domestic gardens (I): Putting small-scale plant diversity in context. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14(1), 71-78.
 
[31]  Manning, A. D., Fischer, J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2006). Scattered trees are keystone structures-implications for conservation. Biological conservation, 132(3), 311-321.
 
[32]  Powell, A. H., & Powell, G. V. (1987). Population dynamics of male euglossine bees in Amazonian Forest fragments. Biotropica, 176-179.
 
[33]  Roulston, T. A. H., & Goodell, K. (2011). The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 293-312.
 
[34]  Biesmeijer, J. C., Roberts, S. P., Reemer, M., Ohlemüller, R., Edwards, M., Peeters, T., & Kunin, W. E. (2006). Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science, 313(5785), 351-354.
 
[35]  Davies, K. F., Margules, C. R., & Lawrence, J. F. (2000). Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology, 81(5), 1450-1461
 
[36]  Winfree, R., Aguilar, R., Vázquez, D. P., LeBuhn, G., & Aizen, M. A. (2009). A meta‐analysis of bees' responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology, 90(8), 2068-2076.
 
[37]  Henle, K., Davies, K. F., Kleyer, M., Margules, C., & Settele, J. (2004). Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiversity & Conservation, 13(1), 207-251.
 
[38]  Cane, J. H., Minckley, R. L., Kervin, L. J., Roulston, T. A. H., & Williams, N. M. (2006). Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecological Applications, 16(2), 632-644.
 
[39]  Jauker, F., Diekoetter, T., Schwarzbach, F., & Wolters, V. (2009). Pollinator dispersal in an agricultural matrix: opposing responses of wild bees and hoverflies to landscape structure and distance from main habitat. Landscape Ecology, 24(4), 547-555.
 
[40]  Fisteag, J. N. (1937). Cercetări Biometrice la Albinele Româneşti (Doctoral dissertation, University of Bucharest).
 
[41]  Milne Jr, C. P., Hellmich, R. L., & Pries, K. J. (1986). Corbicular size in workers from honeybee lines selected for high or low pollen hoarding. Journal of Apicultural Research, 25(1), 50-52.
 
[42]  Winston, M. L. (1991). The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press.
 
[43]  Maebe, K., Hart, A. F., Marshall, L., Vandamme, P., Vereecken, N. J., Michez, D., & Smagghe, G. (2021). Bumblebee resilience to climate change, through plastic and adaptive responses. Global change biology, 27(18), 4223-4237.
 
[44]  Williams, N. M., Crone, E. E., T’ai, H. R., Minckley, R. L., Packer, L., & Potts, S. G. (2010). Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biological Conservation, 143(10), 2280-2291.
 
[45]  Potts, S. G., Vulliamy, B., Roberts, S., O'Toole, C., Dafni, A., Ne'eman, G., & Willmer, P. (2005). Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecological Entomology, 30(1), 78-85.
 
[46]  Mattu, V. K., & Verma, L. R. (1984). Morphometric studies on the Indian honeybee, Apis cerana indica F. Effect of seasonal variations. Apidologie, 15(1), 63-74.
 
[47]  Abou-Shaara, H. F., Draz, K. A., Al-Aw, M., & Eid, K. (2011, September). Simple method in measuring honey bee morphological characters. In Proceedings of 42nd International Apicultural Congress–APIMONDIA in Buenos Aries (Argentina), 21th (p. 222).
 
[48]  Raina, S. K., & Kimbu, D. M. (2005). Variations in races of the honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Kenya. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 25(4), 281-291.
 
[49]  Francoy, T. M., Prado, P. R. R., Gonçalves, L. S., da Fontoura Costa, L., & De Jong, D. (2006). Morphometric differences in a single wing cell can discriminate Apis mellifera racial types. Apidologie, 37(1), 91-97.
 
[50]  Shaibi, T., Fuchs, S., & Moritz, R. F. (2009). Morphological study of Honeybees (Apis mellifera) from Libya. Apidologie, 40(2), 97-105.
 
[51]  Rattanawannee, A., Chanchao, C., & Wongsiri, S. (2010). Gender and species identification of four native honey bees (Apidae: Apis) in Thailand based on wing morphometic analysis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 103(6), 965-970.
 
[52]  Mostajeran, M. A., Edriss, M. A., & Basiri, M. R. (2006). Analysis of colony and morphological characters in honey bees (Apis mellifera meda). Pak. J. Biol. Sci, 9(14), 2685-2688.
 
[53]  Narayanan, E. S., Sharma, P. L., & Phadke, K. G. (1961). Studies on biometry of the Indian bees. III. Tongue length and number of hooks on the hind wings of Apis indica F collected from Madras State. Indian Bee Journal, 23, 1-3.
 
[54]  Sylvester, H. A., Limbipichai, K., Wongsiri, S., Rinderer, T. E., & Mardan, M. (1998). Morphometric studies of Apis cerana in Thailand and the Malaysian peninsula. Journal of apicultural research, 37(3), 137-145.
 
[55]  Tilde, A. C., Fuchs, S., Koeniger, N., & Cervancia, C. R. (2000). Morphometric diversity of Apis cerana Fabr. within the Philippines. Apidologie, 31(2), 249-263.
 
[56]  Ken, T., Fuchs, S., Koeniger, N., & Ruiguang, Z. (2003). Morphological characterization of Apis cerana in the Yunnan Province of China. Apidologie, 34(6), 553-561.
 
[57]  Hepburn, H. R., Radloff, S. E., Verma, S., & Verma, L. R. (2001). Morphometric analysis of Apis cerana populations in the southern Himalayan region. Apidologie, 32(5), 435-447.
 
[58]  Radloff, S. E., Hepburn, R., & Fuchs, S. (2005). The morphometric affinities of Apis cerana of the Hindu Kush and Himalayan regions of western Asia. Apidologie, 36(1), 25-30.
 
[59]  Baskaran, M. (2016). Variation in the morphological characters of the Indian honey bee Apis cerana indica (Fabr.) from northern to southern India. Journal of Apicultural Research, 55(3), 221-227.
 
[60]  Rajkumari, P., Rahman, A., & Bathari, M. (2020). Morphometric and molecular characterization of Eastern honey bee, Apis cerana F. populations in the Northeast Himalayas. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8(1), 1273-1280.
 
[61]  Baskaran, M., & Thiyagesan, K. (2013). Biometric studies of the Indian honey bee Apis cerana indica (Fabr.) in the Nagapattinam District, Tamil Nadu, Southern India. Journal of Apicultural Research, 52(2), 15-23.
 
[62]  Tofilski, A. (2004). DrawWing, a program for numerical description of insect wings. Journal of Insect Science, 4(1).
 
[63]  Bosch, J., & Vicens, N. (2002). Body size as an estimator of production costs in a solitary bee. Ecological Entomology, 27(2), 129-137.
 
[64]  T'ai, H. R., & Cane, J. H. (2002). The effect of pollen protein concentration on body size in the sweat bee Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Apiformes). Evolutionary Ecology, 16(1), 49-65.
 
[65]  Pyke, G. H. (1978). Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants. Oecologia, 36(3), 281-293.
 
[66]  Pignata, M. I. B., & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. (1996). Phylogenetic autocorrelation and evolutionary constraints in worker body size of some neotropical stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Heredity, 76(3), 222-228.
 
[67]  Araújo, E. D., Costa, M., Chaud-Netto, J., & Fowler, H. G. (2004). Body size and flight distance in stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini): inference of flight range and possible ecological implications. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 64, 563-568.
 
[68]  Kshirasagar, K. K. (1976). Studies on Indian apidae with special reference to the Indian hive bee apis cerana indica F.
 
[69]  Banaszak-Cibicka, W., Fliszkiewicz, M., Langowska, A., & Żmihorski, M. (2018). Body size and wing asymmetry in bees along an urbanization gradient. Apidologie, 49(3), 297-306.
 
[70]  El-Aw, M. A. M., Draz, K. A. A., Eid, K. S., & Abou-Shaara, H. F. I. (2012). Measuring the morphological characters of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) using a simple semi-automatic technique. Journal of American science, 8(3), 558-564.
 
[71]  Crespi, B. J., & Yanega, D. (1995). The definition of eusociality. Behavioral Ecology, 6(1), 109-115.
 
[72]  Dar, S. A., & Ahmad, S. B. (2017). Morphometric variations and expression of body colour pattern of honeybee, Apis cerana F. in Kashmir. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5(4), 364-371.
 
[73]  Akahira, Y., & Sakagami, S. F. (1959). A Biometrical Study on the Japanese Honey Bee, Observations upon Some Populations of Kyushu (Studies on the Japanese Honey Bee, Apis cerana Fabr. IX). Journal of Hokkaido University, 10, 353.
 
[74]  Kumar, N. R., & Sharma, R. (2016). Biodiversity in honey bees: Scanning electron microscopic analysis of antenna of plain and hill populations of Apis cerana F.(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies ,4(5), 05-09.
 
[75]  Antontseva, P. V. (1975). Seasonal changes in external characters of local bees of the Dzhungarskii Alatau (mountains). Temat. Sborn. Nauch. Trud. Alma-Atin I Semipal, Zoovet, Institov, 36, 31-32.
 
[76]  Carneiro, L., Aguiar, C. M. L., Aguiar, W. M., Aniceto, E. S., Nunes, L. A., & Ferreira, V. S. (2019). Morphometric variability among populations of Euglossa cordata (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) from different phytophysiognomies. Sociobiology, 66(4), 575-581.
 
[77]  Tan, K., Bock, F., Fuchs, S., Streit, S., Brockmann, A., & Tautz, J. (2005). Effects of brood temperature on honey bee Apis mellifera wing morphology. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 51(4), 768-771.
 
[78]  Gorb, S. N., & Goodwyn, P. P. (2003). Wing-locking mechanisms in aquatic Heteroptera. Journal of Morphology, 257(2), 127-146.
 
[79]  Buchwald, R., & Dudley, R. (2010). Limits to vertical force and power production in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus impatiens). Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(3), 426-432.
 
[80]  Goodman, L. (2003). Form and function in the honey bee. International bee research association.