Development of Ultra Low-Density Fibreboard from Wood Pulp Using Plant Root System as a Reinforcing Material

Vincent P¹, Elwin M^1, , Mithuna M¹, Ganesh Gopal T M¹ and Sreenivasan E²

¹Department of Wood Science and Technology, Mangattuparamba Campus, Kannur University, Kannur, Kerala, India

²R&D Division, The Western India Plywoods Ltd, Baliapatam, Kannur, Kerala, India

Cite this paper:
Vincent P, Elwin M, Mithuna M, Ganesh Gopal T M and Sreenivasan E. Development of Ultra Low-Density Fibreboard from Wood Pulp Using Plant Root System as a Reinforcing Material. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2022; 10(6):328-332. doi: 10.12691/aees-10-6-2

Abstract

The concept of Ultra Low-Density Fibreboard (ULDF) from natural fibres was originated and advanced during the past few decades due to the need for a light-weight, better insulating and buffering material that could replace the synthetic materials like Styrofoam. Recently developed mycelium-based composites were considered as excellent replacements for such synthetic materials. However, one of the drawbacks of mycelium composites were the need for providing optimum conditions for the fungal growth. The present research work explored for the first time, a more practical way of producing ultra-low-density fibreboard by reinforcing the wood fibres with plant roots. As the plant root system grows, it absorbs moisture and the water which pass through the roots by capillary action to the shoots and the water is removed from the leaves due to transpiration. This process also binds together fibrous substrate materials and a biofibre reinforced system is produced in situ, offering great opportunities for the capillary action to the shoots and the water is removed from the leaves due to transpiration. This process also binds together fibrous substrate materials and a biofibre reinforced system is produced in situ, offering great opportunities for the development of fibreboard, utilising almost zero energy for drying of the substrate. Along with that, the work also experimented on the possibilities of creating moulded products using the same method. The boards produced were of lightweight and the production process eliminated the need of hot pressing or drying, thus being highly energy efficient. Nevertheless, the time taken for drying stands out to be a drawback of the process. The study being in its infancy has lot more to improve, together with the need of detailed tests on the physical and mechanical properties of the ULDF products.

Keywords:
plant root system ultra-low density fibreboard wood fibres wood pulp

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Ramesh M, Palanikumar K and Reddy H.K.C (2017). Plant fibre based bio- composites sustainable and renewable green materials. Renewable and sustainable energy review. 79, 558-584.
[2]	Wilson JB (2010). Life cycle inventory of medium density fiberboard in terms of resources, emissions, energy and carbon. Wood and fiber science. 42(CORRIM Special edition): 107-124.
[3]	Li J and Pang S (2006) Modelling of energy demand in an mdf plant. Auckland, New Zealand: CHEMECA 2006, 17-20 Sep 2006. Conference Proceedings of CHEMECA 2006: Knowledge and Innovation, 6 pp. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org
[4]	Piekarshi CM, and Francisco AC (2012) Energy consumption in MDF production: overview of use of renewable and non- fossil energy sources in a Brazilian mill. ICIEOM- July 2012, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. p.1-8. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publications/256495247.
[5]	Xie Y, Tong Q, Chen Y, Liu J & Lin M (2011). Manufacture and properties of ultra-low density fibreboard from wood fibre. Bioresources. 6: 4055-4066.
[6]	Cai L, Zhuang B, Hang D, Wang W, Niu M, Xie Y, Chen T, and Wang X (2016). Ultra-low density fibreboard with improved fire retardance and thermal stability using a novel fire-resistant adhesive. BioRes. 11(2): 5215-5229.
[7]	Kawasaki T, Zhang M & Kawai S (1998) Manufacture and properties of ultra-low-density fiberboard. J Wood Sci. 44: 354-360.
[8]	Liu J, Chen T, Xie Y, Wei Q, Chen Y, Rao J, Niu M and Wang X (2016). Fire performance of ultralow-density fibreboard (ULDF) with complex fire retardants. Bioresources. 11(4): 10261-10272.
[9]	Nasir M, Khali D, Jawaid M, Tahir P, Siakeng R, Asim M and Khan T.A (2019). Recent development in binderless fiber-board fabrication from agricultural residues: A review. Construction and building materials. 211. 502-516.
[10]	Niu M, We Z, Lin X, Xie Y, Bhuiyan IU and Wang X (2018). Manufacturing and properties of ultra-low density fiberboards with an unsaturated polyester resin by a dry process. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 76: 853-859.
[11]	Victrone F, Ramos D, Ferrando F and Salvado J (2021). Binderless fiberboards for sustainable construction materials, production methods and applications. Journal of building engineering.44 (2021).
[12]	Xu J, Sugawara R, Widyorini R, Han G, Kawai S (2004). Manufacture and properties of low-density binderless particleboard from kenaf core. J Wood Sci 50: 62-67.
[13]	Chaitanya S and Singh I (2016) Novel Aloe vera fiber reinforced biodegradable composites -Development and characterization. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 35(19): 1411-1423.
[14]	Liu DT, Xia KF, Yang RD, Li J, Chen KF and Nazhad MM (2012). Manufacturing of a biocomposite with both thermal and acoustic properties. Journal of Composite Materials 46(9) 1011-1020.
[15]	Younguist J A, English BW and Rowell R (1993). Alternative uses of waste-paper in wood based composite products [online]. Recycling Symposium. 359-365. Available at: www.fpl.fs.fed.us.
[16]	Ramesh M, Deepa C, Kumar R.L, Sanjay M.R and Siengchen S (2020). Life cycle and environmental impact assessments on processing of plant fibres and it’s biocomposites: A critical review. Journal of Industrial textiles.
[17]	Girijappa Y.G.T, Rangappa S.M, Parameswaranpillai J and Siengchin S (2019). Natural fibers as sustainable and renewable resource for development of eco-friendly composites: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in materials. 6: 1-14.
[18]	Gurunathan T, Mohanty S and Nayak SK (2015). A review of the recent developments in biocomposites based on natural fibres and their application perspectives Composites Part A; Applied Science and Manufacturing. 77: 1-25.
[19]	Khoo S.C, Peng W.X, Yang Y, Ge S, Soon C.F, Sonne C and Ma N.L(2020). Development of formaldehyde – free bio- board produced from mushroom mycelium and substrate waste. Journal of hazardous materials. 400. 123296.
[20]	Udayanga D and Miriyagalla S.D (2021). Fungal – based Biocomposites: An emerging source of Renewable materials. Microbial technology for sustainable environment, springer, Singapore. 529-550.
[21]	Cerimi K, Akkaya K.C, Pohl C, Schmidt B and Neubauer P (2019). Fungi as a source for new bio-based materials: A patent review. Fungal biology and biotechnology. 6(1).
[22]	Elsacker E, Vandelook S, Brancart J, Peeters E and De Laet L (2019) Mechanical, physical and chemical characterisation of mycelium-based composites with different types of ligno-cellulosic substrates. PLoS ONE 14(7): e0213954.
[23]	Girometta C, Picco AM, Baiguera RM, Dondi D, Babbini S, Cartabia M, Pellegrini M and Savino E (2019). Physico-Mechanical and Thermodynamic Properties of Mycelium-Based Biocomposites: A Review Sustainability 2019, 11, 281.
[24]	Haneef M, Ceseracciu L, Canale C, Bayer IS, Heredia-Guerreo JA and Athanassiou A (2017). Advanced materials from fungal mycelium: Fabrication and tuning of physical properties. Sci Rep 7, 41292.
[25]	Jones M, Huynh T, Dekiwadia C, Daver F and John S (2017) Mycelium composites: a review of engineering characteristics and growth kinetics Journal of Bionanoscience, 11 (4): 241-257.
[26]	Jones M, Mautner A, Luenco S, Bismarck A and John S (2020). Engineered mycelium composite construction materials from fungal biorefineries: A critical review. Materials & design .187(2020).
[27]	Bengough AG, Bransby MF, Hans J, McKenna SJ, Roberts TJ and Valentine TA (2006). Root responses to soil physical conditions; growth dynamics from field to cell. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57(2): 437-447.
[28]	Ravindran G, Ganapathy G.P and Akinwumi I.I (2020). Stabilisation of natural slopes using natural plant root as reinforcing agent. Material today: Proceedings. 39(2).
[29]	Sinha SK, Rani M, Kumar A, Kumar S, Venkatesh K and Mandal PK (2018). Natural variation in root system architecture in diverse wheat genotypes grown under different nitrate conditions and root growth media. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 30, 223-234.
[30]	Cazzuffi D, Cardile G & Gioffrè D (2014) Geosynthetic Engineering and Vegetation Growth in Soil Reinforcement Applications. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotech. 1, 262-300.
[31]	Gadi V, Singh S, Sanghariya M, Garg A, Sreedeep S and Ravi K (2019). Modeling soil-plant-water interaction: Effects of canopy and root parameters on soil suction and stability of green infrastructure. International journal for computer aided engineering and software. 35(3): 1543-1566.
[32]	Guo P, Xia Z, Liu Q, Xiao H, Gao F, Zhang L, Li M, Yang Y, Xu W 2020. The mechanism of the plant roots’ soil reinforcement based on generalized equivalent confining pressure. PeerJ 8:e10064.
[33]	Jin, H., Shi, D., Zeng, X, Wang S, Duan T and Lou Y (2019) Mechanisms of root-soil reinforcement in bio-embankments of sloping farmland in the purple hilly area, China. J. Mt. Sci. 16, 2285-2298.
[34]	Zhang L, Xia Z, Zhou Z, Liu D, Xu W, Li M, Li T and Zhao B (2018) Experimental Study on Tensile Properties and Reinforcement Ability of Plant Roots. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology.17(3), 729-738.
[35]	Gruda N & Schnitzler W (1999) Influence of wood fiber substrates and N application rates on the growth of tomato transplants. Advances in Horticultural Science, 13(1), 20-24. Retrieved November 11, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42881976.
[36]	Harris C.N, Dickson R.W, Fisher P.R, Jackson B.E and Poleatewich A.M (2019). Evaluating peat substrates amended with pine wood fiber for nitrogen immobilization and effects on plant performance with container- grown petunia. American society for horticultural science. 30(1).
[37]	Muro J, Irigoyen I, Samitier P, Mazuela P, Salas MC, Soler J and Urrestarazu M (2005) Wood fiber as growing me dium in hydroponic crop. Acta Hortic.697, 179-185.
[38]	Sreenivasan E (2018) Softboard as a Novel Wood Fibre-Based Substrate for Hydroponic Systems - A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 5(8): 129-131.
[39]	Godara AK and Sharma VK (2016) Influence of Substrate Composition on Roots and their Categories of Strawberry Plants Grown in Different Containers. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7(2): 330-335
[40]	Aziz A.A, Lim K.B, Rahman E.K.A, Nurmawati M.H and Zuruzi A.S (2020). Agar with embedded channels to study root growth. Sci Rep. 10, 14231.
[41]	Gallegos J, Alvaro J.E and Urrestarazu M (2020). Container design affects shoot and root growth of vegetable plant. HortScience. 55. 1-8.
[42]	Haber E.S (2017). The effect of various containers on the growth of vegetable plants. Bulletin. 24(279). Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/bulletin/vol24/iss279/1.
[43]	Zakaria N.I, Ismail M.R, Awang Y, Wahab P.E.M and Berahim Z (2020). Effect of root restriction on the growth, photosynthesis rate and source and sink relationship of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) grown in soilless culture.