Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2328-3912 ISSN (Online): 2328-3920 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/aees Editor-in-chief: Alejandro González Medina
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2022, 10(2), 44-48
DOI: 10.12691/aees-10-2-2
Open AccessArticle

Diversity of Anurans in Temporary Breeding Grounds at Dharwad, Karnataka, India

Manjunath B. Hosamani1 and Girish G. Kadadevaru1,

1Breeding Behaviour and Bioacoustics Lab, Dept of Zoology, Karanatak University Dharwad, -580003, Karnataka, India

Pub. Date: February 07, 2022

Cite this paper:
Manjunath B. Hosamani and Girish G. Kadadevaru. Diversity of Anurans in Temporary Breeding Grounds at Dharwad, Karnataka, India. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2022; 10(2):44-48. doi: 10.12691/aees-10-2-2

Abstract

To record anuran diversity, a study was conducted at eight temporary breeding sites in and around Dharwad (15°26’N 74°58’E), Karnataka, India. For sampling, anuran population, we have used acoustics and visual encounter method. A total of 12 species belonging to four families and eight genera were recorded. The diversity, abundance and relative abundance was highest at site B5 and it was lowest at site B2. Mirohyla ornata was the most abundant species found in all the eight study sites. Hopalobatrachus crassus was the least abundant species. In the pair-wise comparison, beta diversity was highest between the sites B5 and B8 and it was least between the sites B2 and B8. The Jaccard's similarity index was highest between sites B1 and B3, and the minimum similarity was observed at site B8. The study provides a baseline data on anuran assemblage that can be used for evaluating the amphibian status and taking conservation measures to protect the habitat and the species.

Keywords:
beta diversity dominance relative abundance similarity index

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Figures

Figure of 2

References:

[1]  Cooke, A. S. & Ferguson, P. F. Changes in status of the frog (Rana temporaria) and the toad (Bufo bufo) on part of the East Anglian Fenland in Britain. Biol.Conserv. 9, 191-198. 1976.
 
[2]  Beebee. T.I.C. Habitat selection by amphibians across an agricultural Land-Heathland transect in Britain. Biol.Conser. 27, 111-124. 1983.
 
[3]  Zacharias, I., Dimitriou, E., Dekker A. & Dorsman, E. Overview of temporary ponds in the Mediterranean region: Threats, management and conservation issues. J. Envi Biol, 28(1): 1-9. 2007.
 
[4]  Jakob, C., Poizat, G., Veith, M., Seitz A., & Crivelli, A. J. Breeding phenology and larval distribution of amphibians in a Mediterranean pond network with unpredictable hydrology. Hydrobiologia, 499: 51-61. 2003.
 
[5]  Blaustein, A. R.,Wake, D. B. & Sousa, W. P. Amphibian declines: Judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conservation Biology 8: 60-71. 1994
 
[6]  Pearman, P. B. Correlates of amphibian diversity in an altered landscape of Amazonian Ecuador. Conservation Biology. 11: 1211-1225. 1997.
 
[7]  Young, B. E., Lips, K. R., Reaser, J. K., Ibañez, R., .Salas, A. W., Cedeno, J. R., Coloma, L. A., Ron, S., La Marca, E., Meyer, J. R., Muñoz, A., Bolaños, F., Chaves, G., & Romo, D. Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conservation Biology. 15: 1213-1223. 2001.
 
[8]  Heyer, W. R., Donnelly M. A., Mc Diarmid R.W., Hayek L-AC., Foster M.S. Measuring and Monitoring biological diversity Standard methods for amphibians. Biological diversity handbook series. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1994.
 
[9]  Bury, R. B., Campbell, H. W., & Scott, N. J. Role and importance of nongame wildlife. In: Proceedings of the N. Am.Wildlife Nat. Resour. Conference. (Eds N. Scott andW.W. Campbell). Portland Oregon, USA. 197-207. 1980.
 
[10]  Blaustein, A. R. & Wake, D. B. Declining Amphibian Populations: Global Phenomena? Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 203-204. 1990.
 
[11]  Vial, J. L. Declining Amphibian Population Task Force. Newsletter of the Species Survival Commission. IUCN no. 16, June 1991. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. 1991.
 
[12]  Olson, H. D. & Leornard, P. W. Amphibian inventory and monitoring: A standardized approach for the PNW. In: SamplingAmphibians in Lentic Habitats. (Eds H.D. Olson, P.W. Leonard & B.R. Bury). Society for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology, Olympia, Washington. 1997.
 
[13]  Vial, J. L. & Saylor, T. The Status of Amphibian Populations. A Compilation and Analysis. IUCN/SSC, Declining Amphibian Population Task Force, Working Document 1. 35. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. 1993.
 
[14]  Paromit Chatterjee & Krishnendu Mondal. Diversity of Anurans and their Habitat Preference in Temporary Water Pools of a Rock Mining Area at Steel City Durgapur, East India. Advances in Biological Research 10 (6): 374-381. 2016.
 
[15]  Dinesh, K. P., Radhakrishnan, C., Channakeshavamurthy, B. H., Deepak, P. and Kulkarni, N. U., A Checklist of Amphibians of India with IUCN Conservation Status.Version 3.0. updated till April 2020. available at http://zsi.gov.in (online only). 2020.
 
[16]  Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper & P. D. Ryan. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1): 9pp. 2001.
 
[17]  Snodgrass, J. W., Komoroski, M. J., Bryan Jr A. L. & Burger, J. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydro period and amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology, 14: 414-419. 2000.
 
[18]  Pechmann, J. H .K, Scott, D. E. Gibbons, J. W. & Semlitsch R. D. Influence of wetland hydroperiod on diversity and abundance of metamorphosing juvenile amphibians. Wetlands Ecol and Manag 1: 3-11. 1989.
 
[19]  Snodgrass, J. W., Komoroski, M. J. Bryan, Jr. A. L. & Burger. J. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: Implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14: 414-419. 1999.
 
[20]  Babbitt, K. J., Baber, M. J. & Tarr, T. L. Patterns of larval amphibian distribution along a wetland hydroperiod gradient. Canadian Journal Zoology. 81: 1539-1552. 2003.
 
[21]  Andre P. Couto, Eduardo Ferreira, Rita T. Torres, &Carlos Fonseca. Local and Landscape Drivers of Pond-Breeding Amphibian Diversity at the Northern Edge ofthe Mediterranean. Herpetologica, 73(1). 2016.
 
[22]  Tejedo, M., & Reques, R. Effects of egg size and density on metamorphic traits in tadpoles of the Natterjack Toad (Bufo calamita). J of Herp. 26: 146-152. 1992.
 
[23]  Pleguezuelos, J. M., Ma´rquez, R. & Lizana M. (eds.). Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Anfibios y Reptiles de Espana. Direcci ˜ on General de ´ Conservacion de la Naturaleza, Spain. 2002.
 
[24]  Semlitsch R. D, Peterman W. E, Anderson T. L, Drake D. L, Ousterhout B. H. Intermediate Pond Sizes Contain the Highest Density, Richness, and Diversity of Pond-Breeding Amphibians. PLoS ONE 10(4) 2015.
 
[25]  Cardoso, A. J. Andrade G. V. & Haddad, C. F. B. Distribuição espacial em comunidade de anfíbios (Anura) no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 49 (1): 241-249. 1989.
 
[26]  Gascon, C. Population and community – level analyses of species occurrences of central Amazonian rain forest tadpoles. Ecology 72 (5): 1731-1746. 1991.
 
[27]  Huston, M. A. Biological Diversity, The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, 681p. 1994.
 
[28]  Pombal Jr, J. P. Distribuição espacial e temporal de anuros (Amphibia) em uma poça permanente na Serra de Paranapiacaba, sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 57 (4): 583-594. 1997.
 
[29]  Brandão, R. A. & Araújo. A. F. B. A herpetofauna da Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas, p. 9-21. In: J. Marinho-Filho. Rodrigues F.M. & Guimarães M.M. (Eds). Vertebrados da Estação Ecológica de Águas Emendadas. História Natural e Ecologia em um Fragmento de Cerrado do Brasil Central. Brasília, Ibama. 1998.
 
[30]  Eterovick, P. C. Distribution of anuran species among montane streams in south-eastern Brazil. J. of Trop Ecol. 19: 219-228. 2003.
 
[31]  Vasconcelos, T. S. & D. C. Rossa-Feres. Habitat heterogeneity and use of physical and acoustic space in anuran communities in southeastern Brazil. Phyllomedusa. 7 (2): 127-142. 2008.
 
[32]  Vasconcelos, T. S. Santos T. G. Rossa-Feres D. C. & Haddad C. F. B. Influence of the environmental heterogeneity of breeding ponds on anuran assemblages from southeastern Brazil. Canadian Journal Zoology. 87: 699-707. 2009.
 
[33]  Arzabe, C., Carvalho C. X. & Costa. M. A. G. Anuran Assemblages in Crasto Forest Ponds (Sergipe State, Brazil): Comparative Structure and Calling Activity Patterns. Herpetological Journal. 8: 111-113. 1998.
 
[34]  Arzabe, C. Reproductive activity patterns of anurans in two different altitudinal sites within the Brazilian Caatinga. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 16 (3):851-864. 1999.
 
[35]  Bernarde, P. S. & Kokubum, M. N. C. Anurofauna do Município de Guararapes, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura). Acta Biológica Leopoldensia 21 (1): 89-97. 1999.
 
[36]  Talbot, J. J. Habitat selection in two tropical anoline lizards. Herpetologica 33, 114-123. 1977.
 
[37]  Stewart, M. Amphibians of Malawi. State University of New York, New York-.pp163. 1967.