Threats of Land Use Changes on Wetland and Water Areas of Murang’a County, Kenya

Benson M. Mwangi^1,

¹Department of Physical and Biological Sciences, Murang’a University of Technology, P.O Box 75-10200, Murang’a Kenya

Cite this paper:
Benson M. Mwangi. Threats of Land Use Changes on Wetland and Water Areas of Murang’a County, Kenya. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2021; 9(6):585-590. doi: 10.12691/aees-9-6-2

Abstract

Globally, wetlands have declined in area by over 50% since 1900, due to changes in land-use patterns, converting them into farmlands, human settlements, urban centers, and infrastructure development. Land-use changes also impact negatively on the water area (streams, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and sea) of an area. In this study, the threats of land use changes on wetland and water areas in Murang’a County, Kenya, were assessed, in a bid to understand the main causes for the rapid decline in wetland and water areas in the County. Landsat images of 2001 and 2018 were analyzed using a supervised classification technique to produce Land-use maps in ArcGIS and detect associated changes. Between 2001 and 2018, the wetland area in Murang’a County declined by over 48% while the water area declined by over 25%. Bare-soil/built-up area posed the greatest threat to the conservation of wetlands in the County, taking up 161 ha of the wetland area during the period. The growth of woody shrubs posed the greatest threat to the loss of water areas taking up 152 ha of the water area during the period. Mean total threats facing wetlands differed significantly from mean total threats facing water areas in the County (t = 0.682; p<0.001). It is concluded that wetland and water areas are faced with similar human-induced land use threats but at varying magnitudes. It is therefore critical that specific regulatory legal and policy structures be urgently instituted to curtail further wetland and water area losses.

Keywords:
Hydrarch succession encroachment wetland vegetation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]	Daryadel, E. & Talaie, F., “Analytical-Study-on-Threats-to-Wetland-Ecosystems-and-their-Solutions-in-the-Framework-of-the-Ramsar-Convention”. 2018.
[2]	MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Ecosystems and human wellbeing. Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. 2005.
[3]	Keche, A., Ochieng, G., Lekapana, P., and Macharia, G. (2007). Status of Wetlands in Kenya and Implications for Sustainable Development. Environment and Sustainable Development.
[4]	Cowardin, L.M., Carter, V., Golet, F.C., and LaRoe, E.T, Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S Fish & Wildlife Service Publ. FWS/OBW-79/31. Washington, DC. 1979.
[5]	Ramsar Convention Bureau, Ramsar Handbooks for Wise Use of Wetlands. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, 2000.
[6]	Moser, M., Prentice, C. and Frazier, S., “A Global Overview of Wetland Loss and Degradation, Proceedings of Ramsar COP6” Brisbane, 1996, Vol. 10/12, Technical Session B at p. 21.
[7]	Jeelani, N., Yang, W., Xia, L., Zhu, H. L., &An, S., “Ecosystem threats and management strategies for wetlands in China”. Marine and Freshwater Research, 71, 1557-1563, 2020.
[8]	Juliano, K. & Simonovic, S.P., “The Impact of Wetlands on Flood Control in the Red River Valley of Manitoba”, Final Report to International Joint Commission, Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1999, pp.8.
[9]	Oduor, F.O., Raburu, P.O., &Mwakubo, S., “To Conserve or convert wetlands: evidence from Nyando Wetlands, Kenya”. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 7(2): 48-54, 2015.
[10]	Nunow, A. A., The Dynamics of Land Deals in the Tana Delta, Kenya. LDPI: 2017, 1-27.
[11]	Morrison, E.H.J., Upton, C., Odhiambo-K’Oyooh, K. and Harper, D.M., Managing the Natural Capital of Papyrus within Riparian Zones of Lake Victoria, Kenya”. Hydrobiologia, 692, 5-17.
[12]	Twesigye, C.K., Onywere, S.M., Getenga, Z.M., Mwakalila, S., & Nakiranda, J.K., “The impact of land use activities on vegetation cover and water quality in the Lake Victoria watershed”. The Open Environmental Engineering Journal. 4, 66-77, 2011.
[13]	Muema, J.M., Kaluli, J.W., Gathenya, J. M. and Mwangi, B.M., “Evaluation of Wetland Loss in Maragua Watershed, Murang’a County, Kenya”. Journal of Sustainable Research on Engineering 4 (4), 160-170, 2019.
[14]	Murang’a County Integrated Development Plan, 2018. https://cog.go.ke/media-multimedia/reportss/category/106-county-integrated-development-plans-2018-2022?download=311:murang-a-county-integrated-development-plan-2018-2022. Retrieved March 18, 2020.
[15]	FAO. (2000). Land cover classification system: Classification concepts and user manual. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/x0596e/x0596e00.htm. Retrieved February 10, 2020.
[16]	Sun, X., Lu, M., and Ren, Z., “Dynamic changes and sensistivity of water Area of Huixiankarst wetland” earth and environmental science 512, 2020. 012033.
[17]	Zhang, Y., & Wang, D.Y., “Land use Types Dynamic Changing analysis based on remote sensing data in Xianlin district of Nanjing”. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 17, 79-85, 2017.
[18]	Ehrenfeld, J.G.& Schneider, J.P,. “Chamaecyparisthyoides Wetlands and Suburbanization: Effects on Hydrology, Water Quality and Plant Community Composition.” J. Applied Ecology, 28, 467-490, 1991
[19]	Forman, R.T., & Deblinger, R.D., “The Ecological Road-Effect Zone of a Massachusetts (U.S.A.) Suburban Highway”. Conservation Biology, 14(1), 36-46, 2000.
[20]	Fantin-Cruz, I., Pedrollo, O., Girard, P., Girard, P., Zeilhofer, P., & Hamilton, S.K., “Changes in river water quality caused by a diversion hydropower dam bordering the Pantanal floodplain”. Hydrobiologia 768, 223-238, 2015.
[21]	Mitsch, W.J., Gosselink, J.G., Wetlands. 3rd ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. 2000.
[22]	Gaudet, C.L. &Keddy, P.A., “Competitive performance and species distribution in shoreline plant communities: a comparative approach”. Ecology, 76, 280-291, 1995.
[23]	Huddle, J., Awada, T., Martin, D., Zhou, X., Pegg, S., & Josiah, S., “DO INVASIVE RIPARIAN WOODY PLANTS AFFECT HYDROLOGY AND ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES?”. Great Plains Research, 21(1), 49-71, 2011. Retrieved March 10, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23779968.
[24]	Scott, R.L., Huxman, T.E. Williams, D.G. & Goodrich, D.C., “Ecohydrological impacts of woody plant encroachment: seasonal patterns of water and carbon dioxide exchange within a semiarid riparian environment”. Global Change Biology, 12, 311-24, 2006.
[25]	Macharia, J., Thenya, T., and Ndiritu, G., “Management of highland wetlands in central Kenya: The importance of community education, awareness and eco-tourism in biodiversity conservation”. Biodiversity, 11, 8590, 2010.
[26]	Kithiia, S.M., “Land use changes and their effects on sediment transport and soil erosion within the Athi river drainage basin, Kenya”. In: Human Impact on Erosion and Sedimentation (proceedings of Rabat Symposium S6, April 1997. IAHS Publ. No. 245, 1997. 145-150.
[27]	Šantrůčková, M., Demková, K., Weber, M., Lipský, Z., and Dostálek, J., “Long term changes in water areas and wetlands in an intensively farmed landscape: A case study from the Czech Republic”. European Countryside. 9. 132-144, 2017.