Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences
ISSN (Print): 2328-3912 ISSN (Online): 2328-3920 Website: https://www.sciepub.com/journal/aees Editor-in-chief: Alejandro González Medina
Open Access
Journal Browser
Go
Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2021, 9(3), 368-379
DOI: 10.12691/aees-9-3-7
Open AccessArticle

Using Multi - Criteria, AHP and Influence Approaches for Agriculture Development: A Case Study of Upper Mula Basin in Maharashtra (India)

Ravindra D. Gaikwad1, and Vijay S. Bhagat2

1S.N. Arts, D.J. Malpani Commerce and B.N. Sarda Science College Sangamner, Department of Geograpy, Affiliated to SavitribaiPhule Pune University, Pune, India 422605

2Post-graduate Teaching and Research Center in Geography, Agasti Arts, Commerce and Dadasaheb Rupwate Science College, Affiliated to SavitribaiPhule Pune University, Pune, India.422601

Pub. Date: March 22, 2021

Cite this paper:
Ravindra D. Gaikwad and Vijay S. Bhagat. Using Multi - Criteria, AHP and Influence Approaches for Agriculture Development: A Case Study of Upper Mula Basin in Maharashtra (India). Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2021; 9(3):368-379. doi: 10.12691/aees-9-3-7

Abstract

Agricultural development is unique sign for development of agricultural base country. Multi-criteria, AHP and influence based analysis is suitable for agricultural development. Six criterions (Crops) sugarcane, vegetables, pulses, fruits, rice and grains were selected for development indicators of Upper Mula basin in Ahmednagar district, Maharashtra (India). Expert opinions for ranking the criterion selected for influence. Sugarcane, vegetables and fruits show higher influences on development of watershed arrangement in the study area. Further, crops grains and pluses were show significant influence in kharip season. Using AHP techniques for influences were calculated based on weights estimated. Normalized and distribution of specific crops using the values of influences within the sub-watersheds. Agriculture developments influence are classified into very low (< Mean-1STD), low (Mean-1STD to Mean), moderate (Mean to Mean + 1STD), high (Mean + 1STD to Mean + 2STD), and very high (Mean + 2STD<) and agricultural development are classified into high, moderate and low categories. The methodology is the effective tool for agricultural development of sub-watersheds.

Keywords:
AHP ranking multi-criteria influence weights

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References:

[1]  Tschirley, J.B., 1998. Land quality indicators and their use in sustainable agriculture and rural development. FAO Land and Water Bulletin, 5(0), 1-217.
 
[2]  Gumma Murali Krishna, Birhanu Birhanu Zemadim , Mohammed Irshad A., Tabo Ramadjita and Whitbread Anthony M.,2016. Prioritization ofWatersheds across Mali Using Remote Sensing Data and GIS Techniques for Agricultural Development Planning. Water, 1-17.
 
[3]  Gassman P. W., Reyes M. R., Green C. H., Arnold J. G., 2007. Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions. Transactions of the Asabe, 50(4), 1211-1250.
 
[4]  Daloglu Irem, Nassauer Joan Iverson, Riolo Rick L., Scavia Donald, 2014. Development of a farmer typology of agricultural conservation behavior in the American Corn Belt. Agricultural Systems, 29 (0), 93-102.
 
[5]  Panhalkar Sachin, 2011. Land Capability Classification for Integrated Watershed Development by Applying Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 6 (4), 46-55.
 
[6]  Boumaa Jetske A., Biggs Trent W., Bouwer Laurens M., 2011. The downstream externalities of harvesting rainwater in semi-arid watersheds: An Indian case study. Agricultural Water Management, 98 (7), 1162-1170.
 
[7]  Rai P. K., Mohan K., Mishra S., Ahmad A. and Mishra V. N., 2014. A GIS- based approach in drainage morphometric analysis of Kanhar River Basin, India. Appl.Water Sci., 7(1), 217-232.
 
[8]  Su Shiliang, Wang Yaping, Luo Fanghan, Mai Gengchen, Pu Jian, 2014. Peri-urban vegetated landscape pattern changes in relation to socioeconomic development. Ecological Indicators, 46, 477-486.
 
[9]  Zende, Abhijit M., Nagarajan, R., Atal, K. R., 2013. Prioritization of sub-watersheds in semi-arid region, Western Maharashtra, India using Geographical Information System. American Journal of Engineering Research, 2 (10), 128-135.
 
[10]  Driemeier Carlos, Ling Liu Yi, Sanches Guilherme M., Pontes Angelica O., Magalhaes Paulo S. Graziano, Ferreira Joao E. Ferreira, 2016. A computational environment to support research in sugarcane agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 130, 13-16.
 
[11]  ChandraVineet V., Hemstock Sarah L., Mwabonje Onesmus N., N’Yeurt Antoine De Ramon, Woods Jeremy, 2018. Life Cycle Assessment of Sugarcane Growing Process in Fiji. e.Proofing. springer.com/journals_v2. 1-17.
 
[12]  Hess T. M., Sumberg J., Biggs T., Georgescu M., Haro-monteagudo D., Jewitt G., Knox J. W. (2016). A sweet deal ? Sugarcane , water and agricultural transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Environmental Change, 39, 181–194.
 
[13]  Kulkarni Aboli S., Subramanian K.A.,2014. Habitat and seasonal distribution of Odonata (Insecta) of Mula and Mutha river basins, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 5(7), 4084-4095.
 
[14]  Perez Carlos, Tschinkel Henry, 2003. Improving watershed management in developing countries: A framework for prioritising sites and practices. Agricultural Research & Extension Network, 129(129), 1-14.
 
[15]  Bhagat, Vijay S., (2012). Use of Remote Sensing Techniques for Robust Digital Change Detection of Land: A Review, Recent Patents on Space Technology, 2(2), 123-144.
 
[16]  Zolekar, R. B. and Bhagat, V. S., 2015. Multi-criteria land suitability analysis for agriculture in hilly zone: Remote Sensing and GIS approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 118, 300-321.
 
[17]  Ranjan, R., 2013. Saaty’s Analytical Hierarchical Process based prioritization of sub-watersheds of Bina River Basin using Remote Sensing and GIS. Thesis submitted to the Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur, 3, 36-55.
 
[18]  Farhan Yahya, Anaba Omar, 2016. A Remote Sensing and GIS Approach for Prioritization of Wadi Shueib Mini-Watersheds (Central Jordan) Based on Morphometric and Soil Erosion Susceptibility Analysis. ournal of geographic information system, 8 (14), 1-19.
 
[19]  Argyriou Athanasios V., Teeuw Richard M., Rust Derek, Sarris Apostolos, (2016). GIS multi-criteria decision analysis for assessment and mapping of neotectonic landscape deformation: A case study from Crete. Geomorphology, 253 (10), 262-274.
 
[20]  Gaikwad R.D.,Bhagat V.S.,2019, Multi -Criteria Prioritization for Medium Watersheds using AHP and Influence Approaches: A Case Study of Mula Basin in Maharashtra (India). Hydrospatial Analysis, 2(1), 61-82.
 
[21]  Ghanbarpour M. Reza and Hipe Keith W., 2011. Multi-criteria planning approach for ranking of land management alternatives at different spatial scales. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 3 (2), 167-176.
 
[22]  Sepehr, A., Abdollahi, A., Mohammadian, A. and Nejad, M. P., 2017. Prioritization of Kashafrud sub-basins in terms of flooding sensitivity based on ELECTRE-TRI Algorithm. Universal Journal of Geoscience, 5(4), 8390.
 
[23]  Rekha, V. B., George, A. V. and Rita, M., 2011. Morphometric analysis and micro-watershed prioritization of peruvanthanam sub-watershed, the Manimala River Basin, Kerala, South India. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 3(57), 6-14.
 
[24]  Feizizadeh Bakhtiar, Shadman Roodposhti Majid, Jankowski Piotr, Blaschke Thomas, (2014). A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 73, 208-221.
 
[25]  Emamgholi Marouf, Shahedi Kaka, Solimani Karim Khaledian Valid, (2007). Suitable Site Selection for Gabion Check Dams Construction Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Decision Making Methods. Journal of Soil Environment, 2 (4), 170-179.
 
[26]  Maddahi Z., Jalalian A., Kheirkhah Zarkesh M.M., Honarjo N., (2017). Land suitability analysis for rice cultivation using a GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach: central part of Amol District, Iran. Soil and Water Research, 12(1), 29-38.
 
[27]  Gaikwad R.D.,Bhagat V.S.,2018, Multi -Criteria Watershed Prioritization of Kas Basin in Maharashtra (India): AHP and Influence Approaches. Hydrospatial Analysis, 1(1), 41-61.
 
[28]  Silva Richarde Marques da, Santos Celso A.G., Silva Leonardo Pereira E. and Silva Jorge Flavio C. B. da Costa, (2007). Evaluation of Soil Loss in Guaraíra Basin By Gis and Remote Sensing Based Model. ournal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 1(2), 44-52.
 
[29]  Aher, P. D., Adinarayana, J. and Gorantiwar, S. D., 2014. Quantification of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of India: A Remote Sensing and GIS approach. Journal of Hydrology, 511, 850-860.