1Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
2Consultant of acute care medicine, Soba University Hospital, Sudan
3Cardiology Department, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital, UK
4Internal Medicine Specialist, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan
American Journal of Educational Research.
2020,
Vol. 8 No. 9, 727-730
DOI: 10.12691/education-8-9-15
Copyright © 2020 Science and Education PublishingCite this paper: Ihab B. Abdalrahman, Shaima N Elgenaid, Galal Mohamedani, Mohammed Elfatih Ahmed Yousif. Impact of Empirical Antibiotic Choice on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICU with Sepsis and Septic Shock.
American Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 8(9):727-730. doi: 10.12691/education-8-9-15.
Correspondence to: Shaima N Elgenaid, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. Email:
shema2690@gmail.comAbstract
Introduction: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. Sepsis is associated with high mortality rate. Early recognition and administration of appropriate empirical antibiotics therapy is associated with better outcomes; lower mortality rate and reduced length of stay. Objective: To assess the impact and appropriateness of empirical antibiotic choice on the clinical outcomes of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care department. Methods: The study included 53 patients admitted to Intensive Care Units. The type of empirical antibiotic was compared with the sensitivity profile of culture results. The clinical outcome was assessed as mortality or ICU discharges. Results: In this study, 58% of the patients were females and 50.9% were above 65 years. The most common risk factor for sepsis was recent hospitalization (32%) followed by diabetes mellitus (15%). The most common site of infection was the chest (34%). The majority of patients (81.1%) received combination empirical antibiotics. Patients who received appropriate empirical antibiotics had higher ICU discharge rates (P=0.001). Mortality rate was 67.9%; more than half of deaths (58%) occurred among patients with septic shock (P= 0.001). Conclusion: The use of appropriate empirical antibiotics in the management of sepsis and septic shock would result in better patient outcomes.
Keywords